Register now to get rid of these ads!

explain this quarter elliptical set up?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by The_Forgotten, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. The_Forgotten
    Joined: May 6, 2009
    Posts: 83

    The_Forgotten
    Member
    from WNY

    Hey there,

    I was just wondering if anyone on here would comment on what makes this STOCK quarter elliptical setup "work" and not allow the axle to shift side to side.
    [​IMG]

    I love the clean, simple look, especially if I replicated the idea (not my truck in the pic) without the overload springs on top.

    Thoughts? Diagrams? Examples of the same setup on your project? All is welcome.

    Thanks!
     
  2. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    I'm sure the shackles are keeping it centered. Hard to tell from the pic, but there must be something to keep the pinion angle where it needs to stay.
     
  3. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    I'm thinking the pic doesn't show it but the lower spring is a full spring to which the axle is affixed in the conventional way. The 1/4 elliptics on top are auxilary (overload) springs and have nothing to do with axle housing control.



    Ray
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2010
  4. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,430

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    What Hnstray said in his first 3 lines is what I think is up also.
     
  5. scottybaccus
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,109

    scottybaccus
    Member

    That's just an overload spring. This ch***is is riding on the semi-elipticals below.
     
  6. The_Forgotten
    Joined: May 6, 2009
    Posts: 83

    The_Forgotten
    Member
    from WNY

    Hmmm, I hadn't thought that the bottom springs might have been full leaves. That would make sense! I know the top springs are just overloads, scotty, I was referring to what I thought were quarter ellipticals attached to the axle with the arch facing groundwards.

    So, allow me to shift the question slightly, then. Would a quarter ellip set up (such as what appears to be presented in the pic) be possible with the addition of a panhard to keep the pinion correct as Wicked 50 said? Look at my attached thumbnail below for an idea of what I'm trying to do.

    Would a panhard from the rear pumpkin to a cross member keep the pinion angle right?
     

    Attached Files:

  7. scottybaccus
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,109

    scottybaccus
    Member

    Attaching the axle to the spring enslaves the pinion angle to the spring wrap or unwrap. While it may be minimal, it's not really a good thing. Can it be done? Sure.
    Generally speaking, panhard bars and leaf springs don't get along. If you consider the amount of lateral sway in a typical leaf spring rear, the axle is allowed to move a good deal side to side by the collective slack in 3 bushings and a shackle. If you dangle a shackle below the axle, connect the ends of your Q-E spring to that, and then rigidly mount the front of the spring to the ch***is, you have less slack than a standard semi-E leaf setup. Now all you need to do is control pinion angle. This can be done with a torque arm, single upper link or triangulated twin links.

    There are a lot of ways to do this. Search the HAMB a lot for this subject and you'll find magazine articles, home builts and theory out the wazoo. Even better, google some very early Bugattis, and other Euro makes. They used Q-E systems to the highest degree.
     
  8. Ruiner
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 4,141

    Ruiner
    Member

    A panhard wouldn't keep your pinion angle in place...the simplest quarter elliptical setup is a truck arm system with a shackled 1/4 elliptical spring...the angle of the truck arms keep pinion and sway in check and the 1/4 ellipticals only need to do spring duties...
     
  9. pdq67
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 787

    pdq67
    Member

    Just asking??

    What 2-speed rearend is it?

    pdq67
     
  10. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL


    I don't agree with your statement that truck arms keep the axle in place laterally. In OEM applications they were used with a panhard bar and in all hot rod apps I have seen. There isn't enough rigidity in the truck arm bushings, especially with the length of the truck arms (leverage) to control the sideward movement of the axle housing.

    Ray
     
  11. Francisco Plumbero
    Joined: May 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,533

    Francisco Plumbero
    Member
    from il.

    By the time you get done making everything rigid you might be close to a 4 link style setup, by that time the uniqueness of the setup may be lost in the added hardware. Don't you think so?
     
  12. ems customer service
    Joined: Nov 15, 2006
    Posts: 2,654

    ems customer service
    Member

    the pics need to show more, can you post them??
     
  13. Ruiner
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 4,141

    Ruiner
    Member

    I agree, a truck arm system does need a panhard bar, but a dual angle truck arm does minimize sway quite a bit, especially with urethane bushings...but using a panhard does help immensely...
     
  14. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,554

    The37Kid
    Member

    Best way to explain this it to Google Bugatti rear, something should pop up and show how they used this system from around 1912 to 1948. :)
     
  15. onlychevrolets
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 2,307

    onlychevrolets
    Member


    you are correct. the lower spring has only a through bolt in the eye. If it where quarter elliptic it would pivot on the bolt and the axle would hit the frame.
     
  16. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    Looks like a axle out of a IHC 6 Speed Special late 20s. Ratios slow and slower 6 to 1 and 12 to 1 . Had one years ago.
     
  17. "and not allow the axle to shift side"
    As someone who has three race cars with 1/4 eliphtic springs I would like to know or have someone explain how in the world can the axle move from side to side unless the springs break.When we made the jeep I even tried to get side to side movement shaking it and prying it . Tis not possible. The blue rail has only a single 1/4 eliphtic in the centre. It runs like it is on tracks. See "Sr Dragsters Third Wheelie" on Youtube if you have any doubts. The jeep has a pair of 1/4s as does the longer rail under construction. The spring is fastened solid at one end. More solid then a 1/2 eliphtic (most rear leaf spring cars like 55 chev, 55 Ford, 63 Dodge , 67 Camaro etc) would be as they pivot at both ends. .The other end is in a snug fitting shackle welded to the axle in most cases or a convention underslung shackle if double radius rods are used. It simply cannot move sideways. It is not possible unless something breaks or falls off loose. No panhard bar , zip nada. It works beautiful.
    Don
     

    Attached Files:

  18. The_Forgotten
    Joined: May 6, 2009
    Posts: 83

    The_Forgotten
    Member
    from WNY

    Thanks for all the brain medicine, guys.

    Sadly, that pic I posted of the old IH is one I pulled of the internet advertising it being a QE set up.

    I did look up Bugattis a little bit last night and found some fodder to ponder, so that was a great suggestion and I will research it more before I decide exactly how to actually fab. my rear.

    Ruiner: Is there any way you could post a pic or refer me to a post where the setup your talking about (that, at least minimizes sway) is shown?

    Dolmetsch: I'd love to see the single quarter set up you have in that dragster! The last pic. you posted is close to what i"m imagining. I'm going to have to shop around for a decent, virus free CAD program so I can draw my thoughts up in 3d space for me and everyone else to see.

    Thanks all!
     
  19. 63dan63
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 395

    63dan63
    Member

    Here's 10 pounds of **** in a 5 pound sack.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    .
     
  20. sidera208
    Joined: Jun 16, 2009
    Posts: 18

    sidera208
    Member

    that is a great pic of what simple can be. you dont even need the arms if the app is for just a stock motor and no performace.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.