Register now to get rid of these ads!

Rear End Question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lunchboxlbc, Oct 6, 2011.

  1. Lunchboxlbc
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 176

    Lunchboxlbc

    I am changing out the rear end in my 53 chevy 210.

    Right now I have a 350/turbo350 with a 82 camaro rear end. Problem is it's just too wide.

    I have a line on a 4x4 Bravada Rear. It's the perfect width. The question I have; the code is a GT4 which makes it a 3.73 gear ratio, is that a too high gear ratio for highway speeds? I don't want to be wound out at 3500rpm in 3rd gear going down the highway.

    Thanks for the help guys, I appreciate it.
     
  2. dirt t
    Joined: Mar 20, 2007
    Posts: 5,395

    dirt t
    Member

    How does that compare to what is in your car now?
     
  3. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,993

    squirrel
    Member

    It's pretty steep for going 75 mph, I'd look into changing the gears in it or finding a different rearend or using an overdrive transmission.
     
  4. Lunchboxlbc
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 176

    Lunchboxlbc

    Dirt T:
    I don't know the gear ratio of what is in the car now. I do know it will run down the highway at 70 mph pretty easy and it's not wound out.

    Squirrel:
    Thanks for the heads up. Should I be looking at 3.08 gears or lower more like 2.73 for a highway cruiser?
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,993

    squirrel
    Member

    3.08 would be fine, 2.73 would be even more highway friendly, but you lose acceleration with that mild of a gear. Kind of depends what you're comfortable with, etc.
     
  6. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,084

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    do search here for links to charts that give common rearend widths. also, search on line for project33.com and click on calculators to help with gear ratio
     
  7. Just to help you sir with the wording, you have a " low gear ", that is higher " numerically ". You actually want a " higher gear " that is lower " numerically ". If you had a O.D. auto trans or a 5 speed stick, the 3.55:1 is excellent all around cruise and great performance. Your T350 has a 1:1 top gear, and you should be happier with a 3.23:1 or something slightly " higher ". That will be lower numerically, say 3.08:1. The Outside diameter of the rear sneakers will have a small effect on the overall final ratio. Your tire manufacturer should be able to give you a spec- Revolutions per mile. There are many good calculators out there to help fiqure final drive ratio. Best of luck, TR
     
  8. Lunchboxlbc
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 176

    Lunchboxlbc

    Many Thanks Traditions, That explanation is a huge help!
     
  9. Your very welcome sir, TR
     
  10. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,076

    chaddilac
    Member

    Should be much easier to find a rear with the right gearing, than to just grab one and start changing gears. Plus cheaper too!
     
  11. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,793

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Bravada is basically a dressed up full time AWD version of S-10 Blazer. Just look for a S-10 Blazer with a better (lower numerically) gear ratio for your replacement.
     
  12. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,076

    chaddilac
    Member

    That's what I was thinking also!
     
  13. Lobucrod
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 4,121

    Lobucrod
    Alliance Vendor
    from Texas

    There are still lots of second gen camaro rears around and they are a bolt in. Most have 2.54 or 2.73 gears.
     
  14. Rich Rogers
    Joined: Apr 8, 2006
    Posts: 2,018

    Rich Rogers
    Member

    firebird rears were also geared fairly tall to keep the rpms of the Pontiac engines down alittle at highway speed. I would think a 3:23 or maybe even a 3:42 could be a decent highway gear and still give you some performance value.
     
  15. junkman8888
    Joined: Jan 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,072

    junkman8888
    Member

    Greetings! The rear axle from a G-body GM car ('79-84 Monti's, Regals, Olds, ect) is the same width as the S-10 4x4, you'll have to torch off a bunch of brackets and buy some axle saddles to make it work but most of those cars ran the type of gear ratios you are looking for, Good Luck and happy hunting, Mike.
     
  16. melsfine39
    Joined: Apr 24, 2009
    Posts: 235

    melsfine39
    Member

    Ok! Here's what I have going on! I bought a 95 Bravada rear axle(3.73) for the 48 GMC truck I'm building. I'm using the 235 six with a 200 4r trans. The problem I had was the axle tubes are 2 5/8" NOT 3" like most rear axles. I found this out after I got the axle and a 3" mounting kit. Heres what I did...I found a place speedymetals.com They will sell you any metal any length that you need. I bought a piece of DOM tubing 2 5/8" ID 3 1/16' wall and 3" od Cut it in half,wrap the axle. The axle I got was a 7.5 with the 2 5/8 tubes be sure of what your buying! Mel:D
     

    Attached Files:

  17. I am currently changing to a 3.08 gear in my s-10 rear under 54 chevy car. check splines because they come in 26 and 28 spline. my new gear/carrier is 28 spline. have not torn down current rear to see if I will need other axles. gear came out of a 2wd rear. Kenny
     
  18. gsport
    Joined: Jul 16, 2009
    Posts: 677

    gsport
    Member

    here's a ton of information....
    The first gen camaro is slightly narrower than the second gen (70 - 82). First gen is 60 on the rear and approx. 60 1/2 on the front, which is almost exactly the same as your 50. This measurement is mounting surface to mounting surface (outside hub). The second gen is 61 1/2 on the front and 60 1/2 on the rear, mounting surface to mounting surface. Scroll down near the bottom of the info below and you'll find some clip measurements.

    Original Vehicles
    Rear Suspension Width (Flange to Flange)

    Year
    Cl***ic Vehicles
    Width

    26-39
    Plymouth-Dodge car/pick up
    56-58"

    40-52
    Plymouth-Dodge car
    60-62"

    26-39
    Chrysler/DeSoto Car
    60"

    Most Early
    Mopar's
    56-62"

    25-39
    Chevy Car
    56-58"

    26-46
    Chevy Truck
    56-58"

    40-48
    Chevy Car
    58-60"

    49-54
    Chevy Car
    58-60"

    47-54 & 55 1st Series
    Chevy Truck
    60-62"

    Most Early
    Buick,Olds, Pontiac
    58-61"

    28-31
    Ford Car/Pickup
    57 1/2"

    32 & 33-34
    Ford Car/Pickup
    56 1/2"

    35-48
    Ford Car
    57-60"

    35-41
    Ford Pickup
    56-60"

    49-58
    Ford Car
    57-58"

    49-56
    Mercury
    57-58"

    49-51
    Mercury
    61"

    64
    Falcon
    58"

    67
    Cougar
    60"

    55-59
    Chevy Pickup
    62"





    Donor Vehicles Front and Rear
    Suspension Width (Flange to Flange)

    Year
    Cl***ic Vehicles
    Width Front
    Width Rear

    74-79
    Ford Mustang II/Pinto & Mercury Capri/Bobcat
    55 ½"
    55 ½"

    71-77
    Ford Maverick with 8" axle
    56 ½"


    75-80
    Ford Granada with 8" axle
    57 ½"


    64-66
    Mustang
    57"


    67-71
    Mustang
    59"


    72-73
    Mustang
    60"


    67-69 , & 60"
    Camaro
    60"


    64-67
    Chevelle
    60"


    55-64
    Chevy car
    60"


    65-67
    Nova
    58"


    68-72
    Nova
    60"
    60"

    78 & up
    Monte Carlo, Regal, etc. with 10 bolt axle
    58"
    58"

    68-72
    Chevelle with 10 bolt axle
    61 ½"


    89
    Trans AM (Disc brake)
    62"


    76-80
    Camaro/Firebird
    61 ½"
    60 ½"

    68-83
    Corvette
    58 ½"
    59 ½"

    84-95
    Corvette
    59 ½"
    60 ½"

    Early 70's
    "A" body (Dart/Duster) with V8&3/4 axle
    58"



    "E" Body (Cuda) with V8&3/4 axle
    58"



    Dodge Dart
    59"
    55 ½"


    Plymouth Volare & Dodge Aspen
    61"
    60 ½"

    71
    Blazer (6 lug)
    63 ¾"


    75-78
    Granada 9"
    (43" perch to perch)
    52 ¼"

    75-78
    Maverick 9"
    (43" perch to perch)
    56 ¼"

    81-87
    Olds Cutl***
    58 ½"




    FRONT SUSPENSION INFORMATION



    Track Width of Popular Donor Car Clips

    Manufacture
    Model
    Years
    Track Front/Rear
    Curb Weight

    Chevrolet
    Nova
    68-74
    59.8-59.6
    3,770

    Buick
    Apollo
    68-74
    59.1-58.8
    3760

    Pontiac
    GTO
    68-74
    59.9-59.6
    3880

    Chevrolet
    Corvette
    68-83
    58.7-59.5
    3655



    84-95
    59.6-60.4
    3890

    Chevrolet
    Camaro (Z28)
    76-80
    61.3-60.5
    3820

    Pontiac
    Firebird (TA)
    76-80
    61.3-60.5
    3900

    Ford
    Mustang II
    74-79
    55.6-55.8
    3305


    Pinto
    74-79
    55.6-55.8
    3305

    Mercury
    Capri
    74-79
    55.6-55.8
    3305


    Bobcat
    74-79
    55.6-55.8
    3305

    Chevrolet
    Monte Carlo
    78-86
    58.5-58.8
    3235

    Buick
    Century
    78-86
    59.0-58.8
    3700

    Pontiac
    Grand Prix
    78-86
    58.9-59.0
    3735

    Plymouth
    Volare
    75-79
    61.0-60.5
    3395

    Dodge
    Aspen
    75-79
    61.0-60.5
    3395

    Dodge
    Dart
    76
    59.2-55.6
    3600
     
  19. Lunchboxlbc
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 176

    Lunchboxlbc

  20. Keep the 3.73 and put a 700R4 in there and you should get the best of both worlds.


    My '50 has a '75 Camaro rearend in it now and it fit fine. Of course I no sooner finish this than I score a Trans Am posi, so I may swap it again.
     
  21. fiftyv8
    Joined: Mar 11, 2007
    Posts: 5,401

    fiftyv8
    Member
    from CO & WA


    I 2nd that 700R4 idea.
     
  22. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    In this day and age I wouldn't do anything but as already suggested and put an overdrive trans in your car. It makes the car so much more versital and you can pull it down into straight drive when the occasion arrisses to need higher revs in top gear.

    Frank
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.