Register now to get rid of these ads!

235 To Hot Rod Out....

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by NAVYDAVE, Oct 23, 2007.

  1. NAVYDAVE
    Joined: Jun 26, 2007
    Posts: 43

    NAVYDAVE
    BANNED
    from CA

    Looking for a 235 to turn into a tire eater, bored out, cam...... I have a 235 out of a 53, but heard the 55' 235 is better due to higher compression. This will be a daily driver as well. let me know what you think.
    thanks
     
  2. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,027

    belair
    Member

    I would look for the latest year model I could find. Best chance for bigger valves, compression, etc. I have a '61 235 waiting it's turn. Good luck.
     
  3. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,442

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    53 would be the old babbit rod engine. 54 is the first year of full pressure insert rod bearings, also the last year of the short water pump design block.

    But you still really need a 261, they came in big trucks (not pickups) and are a good starting point for a performance stovebolt.
     
  4. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    a 54 235 will work with the same motor mounts as the 53, while later models are different, slightly. 60-62 blocks look like they are the same side engine mount, but are also slightly different. and 55-up use a differnet flywheel, starter, bellhousing than the previous 6 volt versions, but they are easily swapped as long as you use the right generation of parts.
     
  5. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,279

    F&J
    Member

    I am not up on the mounting differences like 53sled posted, but thought I'd add that GMC had a 270 that looks just like a 235. Mine was a 59 1 ton.
     
  6. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,911

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    If you find either a '53 Powerglide engine, or any '54 engine, it's a 100 percent bolt-in and will have full pressure oiling, insert rod bearings, and aluminum pistons. The only difference between the two engines is that the '53 block used the smaller journal '37-'53 cam, and the '54 uses the larger '54-'62 style cam.
     
  7. Revhead
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 3,027

    Revhead
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    There's a guy near me that has been doing machine work for a long time. The other day he was telling me about his friend who ran a car with a 261. he said they would always use 261s and put 283 pistons in them if I remember right.
     
  8. not so hotrod
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 87

    not so hotrod
    Member
    from MA

    I have a 54 half ton pickup with the stock 235 as well.

    Can you bore your 235 cylinders out and put 261 pistons in or is the center distance between cylinders different?

    I thought I heard that the 2 motors used the same crank but with different (beefier) connecting rods and maybe a different head? But I am not too sure.
     
  9. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,739

    Hellfish
    Member

    I would:

    1. Be polite and introduce yourself

    2. Use the search function. A "How do I hop up a 235?" post comes up just about once a month

    3. Check out inliners.org for lots of great info, too
     
  10. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    58-62 engines are the better ones to get. Better bearings, oiling, mounting options, compression ratio. The larger journaled camshafts are cheaper and easier to get in a high perf. version.

    The 53-54 car and 54-55 1st series truck engines are going to be the easiest to install into a 52-54 car because of the motor mounts nad water pump, but when you factor in the differences between those engines and the later versions, especially when considering a performance build, the little extra work it takes to install the later engines is worth it, in my opinion.

    261's have heavier rods and larger piston pins. If you bore out a 235 to a 261, you would need to find a set of 261 rods in order to use 261 pistons, or you could have custom pistons made. Personnally, I wouldn't go over 0.80" on a 235. If you do go more than that, be sure to get a 261 head gasket as well.

    Only the manual tranny car, and the trucks still had the poured babbit rods in '53.

    V8 pistons can be used on the later 230 or 250 engines, not the earlier stovebolts.

    GMC's are about 2" longer than a 235. Oil pan may need to be modified as well. Have to use the GMC flywheel also, but the Chevy bellhousing will bolt up to the block. It will cost about 4 times as much to build a GMC, but you will get much better performance results.

    The Chevy stovebolt bellhousing doesn't care about 6 or 12 volts. The starter and flywheel need to be the same because the tooth count is different between 6 and 12 volts.
    I run a '53 truck bellhousing with a '56 clutch, flywheel and starter, and a '60 261 engine in my '53 truck, for example.
     
  11. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,911

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY


    If the gods find you in favor, you can sucessfully bore a 235 out to 3 11/16 for 252 cubes, but trying to take it out to 3 3/4 will give you an expensive piece of scrap iron. If you find a 261 block and set of rods, you can fake the rest with 235 parts, assuming that you'd be buying new pistons anyway.
     
  12. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,597

    Stovebolt
    Member

    I'm building a different 235 at the moment.

    i've just got a set of 292 rods (via a HAMB relay) and a set of N..O.S. 235 + 0.030" pop-ups. I need to have the small end of the rods bushed to suit the smaller 235 pin, but after stroking the crank to 4.125", i'll have 250 C.I. that should give me heaps of torque, some compression, and as much tire frying as I can handle.

    Sure I've got a couple of 261's but one is for Jimmy rods, buick pistons, and a Wade blower, the other for another set of pop-ups, and 292 rods - for a total of 302 C.I.

    i'm doing the 235 first to make sure the combo works before I use one of my 261's.
     
  13. NAVYDAVE
    Joined: Jun 26, 2007
    Posts: 43

    NAVYDAVE
    BANNED
    from CA

    Thanks for all the info..
    David
     
  14. Reverend Tex
    Joined: Jul 6, 2007
    Posts: 7

    Reverend Tex
    Member
    from Oregon

    Been wanting to do the same thing. I'm still running a 216 ('51) that's been updated as much as possible. I'd like to hear your progress and any tips that might be helpful. I'm probably a year away at least.
     
  15. Lil' Billy
    Joined: Dec 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,088

    Lil' Billy
    Member
    from Georgia

    do an intro...can't you read???
     
  16. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,597

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Hey, I'm considering selling my Jahns pop-ups if you're interested 235 + 0.030" N.O.S pistons and pins.

    I've found something I want even more than these slugs;)
     
  17. NAVYDAVE
    Joined: Jun 26, 2007
    Posts: 43

    NAVYDAVE
    BANNED
    from CA

    that's some big talk
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2011
  18. jcmarz
    Joined: Jan 10, 2010
    Posts: 4,631

    jcmarz
    Member
    from Chino, Ca

    I'm a chevy guy but why? There is no point to it now days. Find yourself a nice 265, 283, or 327.
     
  19. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,911

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.