Register now to get rid of these ads!

Artsy pics???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by DualQuad55, Oct 27, 2011.

  1. roddinron
    Joined: May 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,676

    roddinron
    Member

    Yeah, that Ansel Adams was a fuckin' hack!:D
     
  2. Church
    Joined: Nov 15, 2002
    Posts: 2,844

    Church
    Member
    from South Bay

    The "ARTSY" pics PDQ posted are the best shots on this thread. Well thought out, nicely composed etc etc.
     
  3. [​IMG]
    I dont know if this is considered Artsy by everyone but I think this is a great picture,it shows cool lighting and its kind of an overall shot. "Slick Willys pic"
     
  4. screwshiney
    Joined: Jan 2, 2009
    Posts: 96

    screwshiney
    Member

    Zero time in photoshop...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Von Hartmann
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 988

    Von Hartmann
    Member

    Looks like he probably removed the sponsors from the barricade and probably removed some garbage from around the fence. Good guess?

    Sponsors are a common problem in drag strip photos. Mostly when trying to capture a vintage shot... none of the sponsors look remotely vintage and tracks these days are littered with them
     
  6. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 20,124

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

     
  7. The thing is, not everybody looks at the same things in photos. To me the details and sometimes craftsmanship are what makes a lot of this beautiful. I just went to Hot Rod Reunion and there were hundreds of people walking around taking photos of what they wanted to see. I saw beauty in the details. I make pictures that talk to me and make me feel like I did when I was there. Cars, like women, can be sexy. The perspective, lighting and exposure all add up to how I see things. Everyone has their perspective. If you don't care for mine you don't have to look at them. I'm not selling you anything but I'm sharing my time, effort and perspective for free. Enjoy it, or don't.

    I posted a few what you might call "artsy" photos on Flickr here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/themdidit/sets/72157627848677367/

    I also shot rolls of 120 film on a 1951 twin lens reflex camera that is slow, cumbersome and soft that I may post someday. But they may be too "artsy". But I shoot for me anyway...
     
  8. I probably would have taken time to crop mosly everything but the sky out of those. :rolleyes:

     
  9. cuznbrucie
    Joined: May 1, 2005
    Posts: 2,567

    cuznbrucie
    Member

    "I also shot rolls of 120 film on a 1951 twin lens reflex camera that is slow, cumbersome and soft that I may post someday. But they may be too "artsy". But I shoot for me anyway..."

    McGee......old 120 film, twin lens reflex Rollei's and Yashica's are *traditional*.......

    CB
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2011
  10. Speed King
    Joined: Jul 17, 2007
    Posts: 217

    Speed King
    Member
    from Omaha

  11.  
  12. brad chevy
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 2,627

    brad chevy
    Member

    Artsey enough. :cool:
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Actually shot with a Zeiss Ikoflex. Left the Yashica at home. Next year I'm thinking 4x5 Graflex Speed Graphic from 1948. That should definitely be "traditional". :D
     
  14. PDQ36
    Joined: Jun 6, 2006
    Posts: 72

    PDQ36
    Member

    "This is exactly what we are talking about. I think it is nice and maybe something you would like to hang on the wall but no one can tell squat about your roadster or even that it is a roadster from those shots."

    Do they need to know the model if they like the picture? If it wasn't my own car I'd hang it on the wall.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.