Register now to get rid of these ads!

Weld in crossmember or bolt in?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ROAD AGENT, Dec 5, 2011.

  1. 48 Chubby
    Joined: Apr 29, 2008
    Posts: 1,014

    48 Chubby
    Member Emeritus

    I have installed 7 M II crossmember type suspensions in 42-54 Chevys.
    I hold or have held 11 different welding certificates in pipe, structural, and crane jib welding. (now retired)
    None of this makes me an expert.
    But, my experience has taught me a few things.
    1- A company that makes a fine unit for a Ford or even a Chevy p/u truck ain't all ways the best supplier for one going under a Chevy car.
    2- These frames were never designed to be welded on. I don't know of any of my personal installs that have cracked, but I have seen two of these frames that cracked about 1/2 inch off of the welds.
    3- The 5 cars that I put Ch***is Engineering kits under have had zero problems, one of these has over 50,000 miles on it.
    4- The frames under Kenworth and Peterbilt heavy trucks are bolted together, and have an excellent reputation for durability and toughness in an extreme environment.
    5- Not all of the information you see on the internet is accurate.
    The C/E units also fit well compared others that I've dealt with.
     
  2. mrconcdid
    Joined: Aug 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,156

    mrconcdid
    Member
    from Florida

    Peace of mind, bolt it in heres why.

    bolting it in will help insure it is in the right place and square with the frame.

    You can do it yourself.

    You can take it as a roller to a certified welder if you choose to have it welded in.

    The factory front end was bolted in so strenght, weld vs bolt isnt a concern.

    MrC.
     
  3. terryble
    Joined: Sep 25, 2008
    Posts: 541

    terryble
    Member
    from canada

    I really don't want to start a ******* contest here but a 46 Ford frame is made to be more flexable than the corresponding Chevy frame just because of the suspension design. The transvers spring design put a lot more flex to the frame than the independant front in a GM or Mopar car of the era. All that being said I think if all of us did a little honest reflection here we have seen more cracked/broken frames on all old cars with welded front ends than Chevy boltins. I have never seen a Chevy frame (40s-54) broken out around the steering box but I have seen Fords, Mopars and other GMs do it
     
  4. Quite the debate going on here.
    If you decide to bolt it in road, let me know and ill come hold the light, or hand you tools ill
    bring my own tequila.
     
  5. _ogre
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 127

    _ogre
    Member
    from Motown

    a 110 welder? i agree with blue one, i welded my mustII, trans x-member and boxed the frame all with a 110 flux core welder. i too use to weld for a living, a good weld is a good weld. you are no better off with a poorly done 220 weld than a poorly done 110 weld.

    using the 220 is better than 110 argument, anyone could argue that a 440, 3 phase welder is the only proper welder to use. most bad welds are caused by poor penetration or too much heat. with poor penetration the weld just lets loose, a cracked weld is usually too much heat. you can have both with a 440, 3 phase machine, just as you can have a good weld with a 110 machine.

    i personally like my 110 lincoln weldpac 100. i have never run out of gas. most mustII x-members are 10 ga or 3/16'' steel. a 110 welder will handle either just fine.
     
  6. ROAD AGENT
    Joined: Jan 16, 2011
    Posts: 18

    ROAD AGENT
    Member

    Thanks for the input everyone, definitely helped me out and bolt in it is. Ordered it from CE now just have to wait 6 weeks to get it. And, vicky with the hemi i'll let you know when me n my buddys will be wrenching in the garage
     
  7. 48FordFanatic
    Joined: Feb 26, 2011
    Posts: 1,334

    48FordFanatic
    Member
    from Maine

    I agree Blue One. I have a Lincoln 135 and I wouldn't hesitate provided you know how to weld. The 115 Volt welders are rated to weld at least 1/4 inch thick steel which is much thicker than any frame material you will encounter in these cars . And even if the cross member material thickness is greater , penetration of more than the frame thickness is wasted. If you are a decent weldeer , can run good bead in any position with good penetration , then go for it.
     
  8. bbr
    Joined: Feb 26, 2009
    Posts: 150

    bbr
    Member
    from Missouri

    clean surface, good wire, and good penetration is the key. the 115v welders handle the job fine.
     
  9. carlos
    Joined: May 2, 2005
    Posts: 1,388

    carlos
    Member
    from ohio

    A MII front designed by ford motor was one solid piece after market pieces are just that the spring hats are separate that is why I say weld it.:D
     
  10. the metalsurgeon
    Joined: Apr 19, 2009
    Posts: 1,237

    the metalsurgeon
    Member
    from Denver


    220 MIG or TIG . 115v will not provide sufficient penetration.


    my metal work blog www.themetalsurgeon.com
     
  11. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,511

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    :rolleyes: Wrong and you don't even know it. Did you even bother reading all the other responses ?
     
  12. henry's57bbwagon
    Joined: Sep 12, 2008
    Posts: 680

    henry's57bbwagon
    Member

    I cannot tell you weather to weld the front end on or not. I built all the crossmembers and welded spring and air bag perches on my wagon all with a 110 mig, plus other projects. As long as you do all the prep work right and set up the machine correctly you will get the proper penetration. Most of the pieces on cars are 1/8" or less, which is withing range on 110 machines. Of course practise a lot berore you weld on the frame.
     
  13. _ogre
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 127

    _ogre
    Member
    from Motown

    that 1/8'' metal is tough stuff
    only a 440v 3 phase welder will do :D
     
  14. davidbistolas
    Joined: May 21, 2010
    Posts: 960

    davidbistolas
    Member

    Totally correct- you can do it with the front bodywork still attached, as long as the motor is out.

    You WILL have to trim the inner fenders a bit though.

    The test fit:

    [​IMG]

    Everything squared up and ready to bolt in:

    [​IMG]

    Bolted in, painted and ***embled:

    [​IMG]

    This took me a total of one weekend, accounting for beer.

    Awesome... check my blog or PM me if you get stuck on something :)

    Agree- which is why I went with a bolt in... in fact, the HARDEST part of this build was getting the old crossmember out, and that was pretty easy all things considered.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.