Register now to get rid of these ads!

To box or not to box?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 351cmach, Dec 21, 2011.

  1. 351cmach
    Joined: Feb 2, 2010
    Posts: 83

    351cmach
    Member
    from Ma

    should I box my 38 Ford frame? Front i-beam suspension, rear parallel leafs (with the rear crossmember still in place), mild small block Ford (351 w/c4)(maybe 300 hp). So Should I box it or leave it alone. If I was to box it would I do the front and rear ,the whole frame, or any combination of? :confused:
     
  2. woodypecker
    Joined: Jan 23, 2011
    Posts: 300

    woodypecker
    Member

    I would do the front (but it will work either way) and make sure the frame is in very good shape or reinforced around the mounting points for the parallel leaf springs.
     
  3. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 19,453

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    what did you do to your X member?
     
  4. Ghost of ElMirage
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 757

    Ghost of ElMirage
    Member

    I believe its a waste not only of money but wieght wise as well. My buddy has as a daily driver a 32 five window that he uses 7 days a week 365 days a year. It has been his daily driver since 1952 first with a flattie and then in the 1970s he went to BOSS 302 with a four speed and a 9 inch Ford and the original frame has never been boxed and it still is fine after all these years. Proof to me that unless you're gonna do some serious racing you don't need to box rails.
     
  5. havi
    Joined: Dec 30, 2008
    Posts: 1,876

    havi
    Member

    I would only box a frame if it has independent suspensions. A channel frame is designed to flex with leaf springs.
     
  6. 39 Ford
    Joined: Jan 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,558

    39 Ford
    Member

    Box the front if you feel the need and where the front of your rear springs mount. I also agree with the prior post, boxing is usually done becouse everyone does it, not that it is necessary.
     
  7. Slick Willy
    Joined: Aug 3, 2008
    Posts: 3,056

    Slick Willy
    Member

    Sure, just box up the whole project and drop it off at my shop!:D
     
  8. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    If the original X member is in place, and the frame is not rusted out anywhere, I agree that boxing is unnecessary , given the suspension types you are using.

    With the original transverse spring in front, very little 'twist' is induced into the frame from that end. The X member provides resistance to twist, a feature not found in coventional ladder style frames which benefit more from boxing than yours will.

    Ray
     
  9. iammarvin
    Joined: Oct 7, 2009
    Posts: 1,196

    iammarvin
    BANNED
    from Tulare, Ca

  10. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL


    Actually you didn't ask the same question. You asked about an aftermarket '32 frame...which is a substantailly different animal than a stock '38 frame.

    Few, if any, aftermarket '32 frames have a true X member. The typical repop '32 frame has a cage of light guage, small dimension, rectangular tubing that does (almost) nothing for longitudinal twist. Boxing the side rail "C' channels helps some with that, but still is no match for a proper X member.

    Whereas, a stock '35 thru '48 chassis has a well designed and lengthy X member and is also double walled (not boxed) into the frame rails ahead of and behind the X portion.

    Ray
     
  11. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,329

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    38 frames are pretty stout compared to the earlier frames in most cases it wouldnt be needed
     
  12. iammarvin
    Joined: Oct 7, 2009
    Posts: 1,196

    iammarvin
    BANNED
    from Tulare, Ca

    Ray, you are so right. I have been looking for 35-41 x members to strengthen my 32 frame. I boxed the front, still working on the back. Good/smart info is always needed, thank you!
     
  13. 47chevycoupe
    Joined: Dec 25, 2007
    Posts: 543

    47chevycoupe
    Member
    from Finland

    Glad you asked the question. I am doing the same thing right now on my 38 coupe.
     
  14. caseyscustoms
    Joined: May 15, 2005
    Posts: 1,031

    caseyscustoms
    BANNED
    from st.joe, MO

    anybody got that picture of the guy beating a dead horse?
     
  15. Most best questions asked are from those who want to learn from who know. I've never noticed somebody to ask how to take care of a dead horse here. That should from some kind of or another internet forum that is completely different than this one.
     
  16. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Run it as is, just make sure to patch it where the x member comes into the rails if it needs it, it usually rots out in the rear
     
  17. 351cmach
    Joined: Feb 2, 2010
    Posts: 83

    351cmach
    Member
    from Ma

    Here it is
     

    Attached Files:

  18. fiftyv8
    Joined: Mar 11, 2007
    Posts: 5,401

    fiftyv8
    Member
    from CO & WA

    Box it.
    Protect your investment in time and effort.
    Keeps the underside of your vehicle looking clean and tidy.
    Is an insurance policy for your body, helps to reduce stress and cracking.
    Makes your suspension work better.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. iammarvin
    Joined: Oct 7, 2009
    Posts: 1,196

    iammarvin
    BANNED
    from Tulare, Ca

    What as been seen can not be unseen............thanks...not.
     
  20. VoodooTwin
    Joined: Jul 13, 2011
    Posts: 3,453

    VoodooTwin
    Member
    from Noo Yawk

    A 70+ year old frame with a more powerful drivetrain would probably do well boxed. Here's a question: why NOT box it? If you have the chassis separated from the body already, why not do it and play it safe? What would Boyd do? :p
     
  21. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Well, assuming a good solid original frame to start with, a good reason not to box it might be that it is a LOT more work, done neatly and properly, than one might imagine and for little or no REAL gain in utility.

    The '35 thru '48 frames, with the stock X and other crossmembers in place, has numerous intersections of those crossmembers with the main rails. Further, the X member channels tuck into the side rails well past the point where the X meets the side rail. The consequence is that the side rails are double thickness ahead of and behind the X member for most of the remaining length of the side rail. Kind of tough to improve on that, especially when you consider the time and effort involved, unless you build a whole new frame from scratch....in my opinion, of course.

    Ray
     
  22. old rodder 1945
    Joined: Nov 17, 2011
    Posts: 4

    old rodder 1945
    Member
    from elgin il

    just turn 100000 miles 39 ford un boxs frame no problem
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.