Register now to get rid of these ads!

FE bellhousing questions now!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Judd, Dec 27, 2011.

  1. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Man what a mess! I removed the buggered up scattershield and have what I was told was the original bellhousing but the starter and clutch fork don't seem to line up correctly. The fork and shield had blue paint that tells me they are for later model FE but the starter looks like it might be correct.

    The numbers on the bellhousing are4848339 with a 1m21 in a rectangle raised area with screw head looking circles on either side. Yahoo searches show 60 - 61 on the bell is it correct for my 62 406 Galaxie? Is there some extra mounting parts between the bearing at the far end of the starter shaft or should the starter bearing fit in the cup for support?

    THANKS!!!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,458

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    from what I know of Ford casting date codes, 1 = 1961, M = December (?) 21st

    The cup is just a dust shield, isn't it?
     
  3. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    Which trans do you have, the old T-10, or has someone put in a toploader? The T-10 has a narrower bolt pattern, while most toploaders have the wider pattern, but aso a second set of holes in the old pattern. The front bearing retainer is also different diameter on early trannies, make sure your retainer fits the hole in the bell properly. I have the original bell for my 406 car, but when I'm running a 4-speed I just use a toploader/scattershield/late flywheel & starter combo
     
  4. Ole don
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,915

    Ole don
    Member

    That starter will fit in with the three shoulder bolts. If you have lost the starter bolts, you may use clutch preasure plate shoulder bolts. They should be close. The starter drive goes beyond the flywheel.
     
  5. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Gene
    I have what looks to be the original narrow pattern T-10 The bell fits the front bearing retainer like a glove.

    Squirrel
    Thanks that would be good date code for this car.

    Don
    I will try the mount again tomorrow on starter.

    The scatter shield looks like it was for later FE with small starter nose and I may have a later clutch fork that may be shorter than the early forks?

    THANKS AGAIN!! for the help unbutchering this car!
     
  6. tommyd
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 11,997

    tommyd
    Member
    from South Indy

    Those early FE starters just look WRONG!
     
  7. Remember, the older starters that engage from the rear of the flywheel have a different tooth count than the newer style.If you have a 65 or newer flywheel then that is the wrong starter for your application.
     
  8. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Tried the starter again the 3 mounting bolts line up but mounting flange on starter seems to small and the bearing at far end of the starter shaft has no suport could this be a y-block or 6 cylinder starter?
     

    Attached Files:

  9. 65COMET
    Joined: Apr 10, 2007
    Posts: 3,086

    65COMET
    Member

    Judd;have you tried FORDFE.com,or FE Power Forums?A lot of knowledge over there.A 62 would have the weird starter and a T-10 narrow case,and the toploaders came as narrow case until 65 when they would have both bolt patterns.Judd,it could be a six banger starter or a y-block,they look the same,not sure of dimensions. ROY.
     
  10. farmalldan
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 141

    farmalldan
    Member
    from Duncan, OK

    What you are calling a bearing is the overrunning clutch. It does not fit into the bellhousing. There is no support for the starter armature at that end. I do not recall any difference between y block and FE staters up until the tooth count change. I'm fairly sure I used the 6v starter from my 239 with the 332 I put in my 54. I don't know how much clearance there is at the pilot on the starter flange and you don't quantify how much clearance you have, so I can't comment on the "seems too small" statement. Good luck.
     
  11. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Roy
    I can't seem to get on either of those sites, I'm signed up on both. One asks me to sighn up again when I try to post and I'm waiting for the second message on the other site? LOL they probably know what a pain I am with all the questions.

    Farmalldan
    The starter i have has a C shaped ring on the bellhousing side of the mounting flange that looks like it should fit snug in the C shaped groove on the bellhousing but the starter ring is about 1/4" smaller in diameter. So the piece on the far end of the started shaft that looks like a bearing isn't and doesnt need to be supported?
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Nash-Time
    Joined: Oct 28, 2010
    Posts: 39

    Nash-Time
    Member

    If my memory serves there should be a 14ga tin that is between the flywheel and block that the smaller starter ring fits into. Small block Fords are that way and so are the big blocks. Circle track racing the 390's we would ditch the old style starter for the newer one to save a few pounds.
     
  13. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Nash-Time

    Thanks! that may be it.
     
  14. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    Thanks for help everybody!!! I have the bell hung ready for motor when machine shop is done!
    The Ford racing fender cover is good for 10mph top end! LOL
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.