Register now to get rid of these ads!

Borgeson vibration reducers... worth the $$$???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 49ratfink, Jan 7, 2012.

  1. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,956

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    re-doing the steering on a 40 ford pickup with MII. going to replace the steering components below with proper parts from Borgeson.

    wondering what peoples opinions are of the vibration reducers. don't need to spend $116.00 on one if the difference is minimal.


    ...yes, those are impact u-joints used in the steering. yes the "support" was booger welded to the extreme.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,512

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta


    Did you hunt down and beat the guy who built that until he was very near dead ?

    If not then you should. :D
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  3. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,291

    F&J
    Member

    I am guessing that their vibration reducer takes the place of not having a rag joint. I'd use an oem rag joint if it does not show too much.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  4. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,203

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    ""wondering what peoples opinions are of the vibration reducers. don't need to spend $116.00 on one if the difference is minimal""

    I got one when they first came out..exchanged it cause it ran out so bad it looked stupid...The relacement got sloppy real quick so took it out, noise increase [like when manuvering for parking] was minimal and noticed no difference going down the road...IMO would leave it out....
     
  5. George/Maine
    Joined: Jan 6, 2011
    Posts: 949

    George/Maine
    Member

    I would start over with no vibration reducer.At rack u joint then to around steering box location ,support bearing,then to colume.
    I have a 39 ford that what i did.Borgeson parts work well.
     
  6. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,956

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    this will have a support bearing in the middle. Borgenson says use the vibration reducer after any support bearing, so a rag at the rack may not work as intended ??
     
  7. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,291

    F&J
    Member

    I'm not an engineer. The rag was never meant to be used to change an angle, it's job was to take out vibrations from road feel. So, I don't know anything about those aftermarket parts....I have only used oem parts.
     
  8. Fenders
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 3,921

    Fenders
    Member

    Seems to me if you've got vibration in the steering, solve the problem don't just mask it.
    FWIW I have side steer in my current coupe, solid shaft, one U joint, Mustang box, no vibration no bump steer.
     
  9. maniac
    Joined: Jul 11, 2005
    Posts: 539

    maniac
    Member

    I ran a stock type rag joint after I wiped out one of the steering u-joints, cause of the shock of hittin the bumps on the lovely north east roads, took like 40,000 miles to do it.

    Then a few years ago I put the stock rams horns back on and the stock rag wouldn't fit.

    I used the Borgeson one then, mine is at the bottom of the column, no road vibrations at all, and the thing has around 20,000 miles since I put it in there and its still tight.
     
  10. micky69
    Joined: Dec 24, 2010
    Posts: 288

    micky69
    Member
    from Ohio

    We recommend at Flaming River if you are going to run a vibration joint to put it on the column end for the most effective results. Most of the time in a 3 joint system you wont need them.
     
  11. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,956

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    can't put one on the column, it is 1" x 48 spline, I did not see one in the catalog to fit. I was thinking of maybe putting it after the support bearing, but it sounds like they don't do much.
     
  12. blue 49
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,136

    blue 49
    Member
    from Iowa

    I had a '49 chevy with a Pacer crossmember and power rack without any kind of damping, just borgeson u-joints.I always thought I could feel the vibration of the hydraulic fluid of the rack. I had the truck blown apart to rebuild the engine and decided to raise the crossmember to lower the truck a little more. When I put it back together, I added a Borgeson vibration reducer. When I got it back on the road, I couldn't tell any difference.

    Blue
     
  13. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    Use the one from the original 40 P/U.:D

    Is it a Mercedes or a hotrod P/U?

    I can find a lot of better places to use 116 bucks on a hotrod. c'mon man!:D JMHO
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  14. I ran one initially (mounted to the end of my column) ... ended up changing my exhaust and steering column angle (and length) and didn't have the space to reinstall it. Replaced the Borgeson vibration reducer with a regular Borgeson steering joint ... never noticed any change at all (and I drive my car a lot).
     
  15. 50adrod
    Joined: Dec 10, 2008
    Posts: 36

    50adrod
    Member
    from Louisiana

    those impact universals would scare the **** out of me in a steering system. I have seen those come apart many times. dont trust your life or the life of others on the road to that little pin in the universal. use components designed for steering. and to answer your first question I have used the Borgeson piece and it works well.
     
    Gasser 57 likes this.
  16. Gman0046
    Joined: Jul 24, 2005
    Posts: 6,256

    Gman0046
    Member

    My 62 wagon has GM 605 PS with a combination universal/vibration damper. Works great, well worth the $116.
     
  17. Bert Kollar
    Joined: Jan 10, 2007
    Posts: 1,261

    Bert Kollar
    Member

    I have three joints (Unisteer) in one of my cars and have no vibration problems
     
  18. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,791

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have three U-joints with a support bearing in my 38 Chevy to fit the steering around the 454, with Must II suspension and power rack. No vibration dampener, just the good quality U-joints. Never noticed any vibration problems.
     
  19. Fordtudor37
    Joined: Jan 5, 2011
    Posts: 273

    Fordtudor37
    Member

    I know many people who say there is no difference, but for myself with nerve damage in both my wrists and hands (carpel tunnel) I can tell there is a difference.

    That is one part I would list in the "Makes you comfortable" listing.
    It's kinda like the difference between AM/FM/single disc CD or AM/FM/Multi-disc CD.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2012
  20. mj40's
    Joined: Dec 11, 2008
    Posts: 3,303

    mj40's
    Member

    I found that the vibrations were minimal with a manual RP. But after driving for a couple hours my hands would go to sleep. Trying one in my 40 coupe and pickup project now.
     
  21. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,956

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    when I first looked at the steering I thought it was put together from parts from whatever the donor car was that gave up the motor and steering column. I was quite suprised to see "snap-on" on one of the u-joints.

    sounds to me like any difference would be minimal at best. think I'll just put it together without one. the owner is just going to putt around town in it anyways. said he wants to go to the cruise night a few miles from his house in the summer and not much more.
     
  22. Fordtudor37
    Joined: Jan 5, 2011
    Posts: 273

    Fordtudor37
    Member

    Sound like mj40's has a case of carpel tunnel coming on !

    The other thing I found that works is on long trips, take turns which hand you use driving as it reduces the "vibration time" thru your hands and eventually into the neck muscles.
     
  23. da34guy
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,708

    da34guy
    Member Emeritus

    1st off, hope ya threw away all that junk that was on it.
    Next use Borgenson joints and shaft to the MII and be done with it, no dampner needed. If the f/e is set up correctly
    Just my 2 cents:cool:
     
  24. George/Maine
    Joined: Jan 6, 2011
    Posts: 949

    George/Maine
    Member

    This is what I did on my 39Ford,Support Bearing near, old box,Borenson ujoint,I used old steering colume and welded spined shaft to old and used exhaust pipe and stuck a Harley bearing in it.Then ran down to rack with another u joint.Works good.
    [​IMG]
     
  25. Just Gary
    Joined: Oct 9, 2002
    Posts: 5,822

    Just Gary
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    BTT
    Any new insight in eight years?
     
  26. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,956

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    put it together without it as I didn't see a need for it. I only drove it around town. drove and steered nice. the guy is still putting around town in it, though he is a British car guy with MG's and things of that nature. the 40 looks odd in his driveway with the others, it belonged to his father in law who built it in the 80's
     
    Just Gary and 50flathead like this.
  27. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,476

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

  28. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,203

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.