Register now to get rid of these ads!

Best Motor for a big truck?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Cutlassboy68, Jan 13, 2012.

  1. mike hohnstein
    Joined: Dec 4, 2011
    Posts: 262

    mike hohnstein
    BANNED
    from wisconsin

    Inquiring mind that has actually retrofitted some diesel engines just want's to know how many of you guys arching about diesel in this old chebby have done such a swap, successfully while we are still sort of young??
     
  2. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,731

    flynbrian48
    Member

    I don't think there's a "period correct" car hauler truck, is there? Ramp trucks weren't around, people didn't haul cars, they drove them. Unless you could find an old car transporter, the Art Deco style from the period, that's about it. Build it like 47 1.5's Ford, put a 5th wheel on it, and make like "Cannonball!" Just build it to be reliable and stop.

    I've got a 6.0 LQ9/4L60E in my '48 Diamond T with a Dana 70 rear, 4.10's. Should be reasonably OK with the TALL 245/75R17's, although we're not looking to set any MPG records. It should be WAY better than my 454/Turbo400 powered '76 GMC with 4.56's...

    Brian
     
  3. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member Emeritus
    from Berry, AL

    GM put the 4V-71 Detroit Diesel in some of those trucks. Little two strokes that will scream and have gobs of torque. I saw one several years ago, IIRC it had an Allison 5 speed auto behind it. Probably have to find an old forklift or such for one now.
     
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,043

    squirrel
    Member

    Interesting that they don't mention it in the 1969 full line truck parts book, which lists all the engines they put in all the trucks. The 4-53 in 60 series and 6-53 in 80 series trucks were available starting in 1962.
     
  5. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,768

    Rickybop
    Member

    394 Olds. Lots of torque, and early enough.
     
  6. krooser
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 4,583

    krooser
    Member

    500 Caddy with a TH400 and a Gear Vendors OD..... that's if you want to drive it next year. Won't be TOO expensive...
     
  7. jcmarz
    Joined: Jan 10, 2010
    Posts: 4,631

    jcmarz
    Member
    from Chino, Ca

    drop in a 261
     
  8. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,383

    BJR
    Member

    X3 on the 472-500 Cad 500 foot pounds of torque in stock form & close to 400 HP.
     
  9. John356
    Joined: Jan 27, 2008
    Posts: 66

    John356
    Member

    Detroit 3-71 and ****er 4x4 and you'll be a real trucker
     
  10. patrick66
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 4,780

    patrick66
    Member

    Do it right, make it useable and drivable, and stick the ***mins 12V 6BT in it with a 5- or 6-speed manual. Put a Dana 70 dually pickup axle under it. Add brakes. Drive it.

    Remember, YOU asked.

    You can have "period correct", which means a Six and 50 mph top speed. You'll look great, but you'll need a week to get anywhere. Or, you can have "period-correct" in external appearance, and run the ***mins with late-model front brakes and Dana rear, and actually be able to USE it. Your choice.
     
  11. Vendome
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 130

    Vendome
    Member


    What he said^^^^^period.
     
  12. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,242

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    They don't get the greatest fuel mileage, but a Detroit would be cool and appropriate.

    This one is a 4-53T.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2012
  13. i know where theres a 10.4 liter GMC 60* v8 that would period correct and have tourque for days, or why not the GMC v12? both of those are slow reving tourque monsters..
     
  14. Hackman
    Joined: Feb 4, 2009
    Posts: 646

    Hackman
    Member
    from Butte, MT

    Squirrel,
    Thanks for lining my rookie *** out on the Pontiac deal. Guess I should do my homework first.

    Thanks again.
    Hack
     
  15. iwanaflattie
    Joined: May 14, 2011
    Posts: 4,268

    iwanaflattie
    Member

    Holy ****!
    Hey so My father in law has a 53?? dodge car hauler with a general motors diesel.Is that the same engine than in this truck??
    I will try to take pics tomorrow.
     
  16. 48buickkid
    Joined: Dec 8, 2010
    Posts: 163

    48buickkid
    Member

    Put a ***mins in it along with a modern drive train, its a hauler not a rod!You want to be able to fix it if it breaks down on the highway some where and its nice to be able to go into a parts store and get parts. Gas mileage with the diesel wouldn't be all that bad where as a gas motor would empty your pockets pretty quick. 50mph on the highway is dangerous to you also, you may be big and visible but people nowadays are pretty dumb. Hell most of the vintage rv people even do drivetrain swaps it just makes sense.
     
  17. Lobucrod
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 4,121

    Lobucrod
    Alliance Vendor
    from Texas

    Depends on what Period you want to be correct for and how usable you want it to be. '90 rear axle will kill the 'period correctness'. If its a hauler and not a show truck, build it as such. I'd consider the 292 six. tough motor with lots of torque and fits in the confines of the hood, clears the steering. Ought to go down the road at 70 easy with the '90 rear axle with 373 gears.
     
  18. NAT WILLIAMS
    Joined: Nov 7, 2008
    Posts: 133

    NAT WILLIAMS
    Member

    ***mins makes a 4 cylinder turbo engine that I have seen in trucks 25 years ago. Might be the same that you find in case backhoes and farm tractors. They are cheap and powerful with out the newer emisions. Stay far away from teir 3 and up engines.
     
  19. Well, you started off right by asking questions. After you sift through the facts and opinions, whatever you decide, write it down...have a plan. You don't want to build it three times before you put it on the road. Best recommendation would be to figure out what fits in the engine compartment as is, then figure out how much leg room you are willing to sacrifice. You can have the period correct look by going with a later Pontiac or Buick Nailhead. With the earlier valve covers and breathers a 401 is hard to tell from a 322. (you, with the tape measure, sit down and shut up). I'm a big fan of diesels for towing/hauling, and love my ***mins, but there are more choices than that, which may be a better fit. Fitting your cab to a later ch***is gives you better brakes and a drive train you can buy parts for from most any parts store.

    What level of fabrication are you at? How much work do you want to do?
     
  20. barry wny
    Joined: Dec 31, 2009
    Posts: 451

    barry wny
    Member

    As said, you have 4000 rpm gas motor gears, a 2000 rpm diesel motor will need related gearing. A detroit would be my choice because it sounds so damn cool, truck, log skidder or whatever I liked using them because at least it sounded like you were doing a big stroke of business. Downside,
    They are happy screaming, will **** a valve if you try to lug it, especially if healthy or jacked up, narrow power band, need lots of gears and stay on top of it. Pressurized crankcase, they will leak no matter what you do, O-rings do not hold, and 2 cycle Diesel oil is like ink, will not wash off.
    Big gas motor in a truck you will need both tanks, I know where there lots of them nothing wrong other than not enough gas money to make them go. Walter, White Mustang, Brockway with Chrome Moly 6, Ford 549...
    Little ***mins driveline from a rotted out Dodge, or IH DT466 is good choices in my experience. Now, if gas gets back to $.50 a gallon, or you don't really need to use it...go big carburetor
     
  21. mike hohnstein
    Joined: Dec 4, 2011
    Posts: 262

    mike hohnstein
    BANNED
    from wisconsin

    Now that's proper. There is a GMC 2 1/2T in the ba*****t of the ACD museum in Auburn IN. It is restored and original specs, has a 353 Detroit.
     
  22. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,706

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    I love the sound of those old Detriots but would probably need ear plugs for a long trip and if you thought those old stovebolt sixes marked their territory well those Detroits were worse as I seen them leave puddles at stop lights. If you are going to stay some what local a 261 or 302 six hooked to a Clark 5 speed and 2 speed rear end should work just fine but if you are going to take some cross country trips a diesel and modern drive line would be much better. If you go with a 2 speed rear end you better do some research as I always thought they were like a overdrive but heard most actually have steeper gears in low range to help get the truck going and the high range is the usual steep gears they normally have.
     
  23. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,242

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    If it's an old GM diesel it's most likely a similar engine. There are a lot of different variations. They are described by the "series" of -53, -71 and -92. This is the displacement of each cylinder. The cylinders are sort of modular and any -53 engine will use the same piston, rod, and cylinder liner. So a 4-53 is 4 cylinders of 53 cubes each, for a total of 212. There are also inline and V arrangements, a 6-71 is an inline 6, a 6V-71 is a V6. They are sometimes described by displacement, like a "Detroit 318" usually means a 6V-53.

    The smaller 3-53 and 4-53 engines will fit in a 1 ton or smaller truck and are used for swaps. They originally were mostly in front end loaders, generators and other industrial equipment. A 6-71 is a big truck engine, found in coach buses and semi tractors. They went all the way up to a 12V-92 typically used in boats or gensets.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2012
  24. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    Lotsa good info and ideas here, but the decision is really all about you! Strict period correct would be a 216 or 235, but I don't wanna ride any distance with you! A GMC 270-302 will still look fairly original and pull harder. You can still have an I6, but be more rpm capable with the 250-292, but anybody with just a little GM engine knowledge will know it ain't strictly period correct.
    If you want to get somewhere in a hurry and are willing to keep the hood closed or just say "It's mine and I did it MY WAY", then install a big block V8 gas GM engine and you can get outta the slow lane!
    Turbo diesels are powerful engines, and get lots more pull per gallon of fuel. Just returned from a empty round trip to Williamsburg VA in my OT '03 Chev Silverado with Allison 5 speed and Duramax diesel. Traveled at whatever speed it took on I95 & I20 to stay in the fast lane, mostly 70-75, sometimes 80, overall trip average mpg=23.2. Another trip pulling a trailer with a big lathe for a towed load of 10,000# plus, pulled over Mt. Eagle in Tn with cruise control on 55mph and only dropped outta OD a couple times for less than a minute each time.
    Diesels stink a bit, are noisy, and sure ain't period correct, and fuel price is more per gallon than gas, so consider this in YOUR decision.
    Dave
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2012
  25. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,055

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    500's aren't all that big and aren't very expensive. This one came out of an ambulance
    [​IMG]

    It's going in my 71 GMC but I am looking for another one for my 51 Chev 1-1/2 ton. I plan to put later 1 ton suspension and axles under it though. That's so I can have a truck that stops and handles along with one that I can drive at highway speeds.

    As some of the guys said, there sometimes is a serious dividing line between being "cool" and having a practical but cool hauler that you can actually use. One you can jump in and make a 300 mile run to pick up a project with without a thought except where is you are going to eat is one thing but one that you end up driving at 45 mph top speed for the same 300 miles and then driving back the next day because it became a two day trip is another. I remember climbing Snoqualmie p*** with my step father in a borrowed 1-1/2 ton of that vintage at a grand 20 mph for about 40 miles when I was 15. Every hill met you ended up running in second gear with the engine wound out for miles on end.
     
  26. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    How is a 270 or 302 not "Period correct"? They started making 270s in thirty nine or so. 302s on '51. May not be numbers matching restoration but as far as being correct for his time frame, should be fine. I like my ***mins. 1992 engine. Pre smog. 5 speed. good mileage. Not correct but a good puller.
     
  27. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member Emeritus
    from Berry, AL


    I think you are right, I probably had my numbers wrong. It was probably a 4-53 I saw . It might have even been swapped in, I don't know for sure. I do good to remember what I had for breakfast this morning sometimes!:D
     
  28. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Rolls merlin mounted in the bed.... 2000+ hp at less than 4k rpm
     
  29. BigPerm365
    Joined: Jan 8, 2012
    Posts: 47

    BigPerm365
    Member

    IMHO....As a long-time diesel parts guy...the last thing I'd use is ANY Detroit-Series engine.

    1.) THey are really loud ( hence "Gimmy Screamers ).
    2.) They ALL bleed oil everywhere...always.
    3.) Not alot of HP
    4.) Limited torque w/o alot of gears.
    5.) JUst dont' do it.

    Buy an early ***mins 6BT.
    1.) you can have any competent injection shop pump the injector pump up for HP
    2.) w/ANY maintenence...it shold run any easy 200K towing.

    Questions...?

    BigPerm
     
  30. Dynaflash_8
    Joined: Sep 24, 2008
    Posts: 3,048

    Dynaflash_8
    Member
    from Auburn WA

    go 12 valve ***mins and be happy

    or a 318 detroit
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.