Register now to get rid of these ads!

GM Brake Question- Old VS. New - I'M SO CONFUSED!!!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by the-rodster, Feb 13, 2012.

  1. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    I clipped my 49 Ford Tudor sedan with a 90 S10. Fits GREAT!

    I ***UMED I would just use a standard GM (old) style master cylinder to work with the newly mounted front suspension.

    BUT, then I started looking at the differences between the newer brakes/master cylinders and found out that these new "quick take up" calipers won't work with the older GM master cylinders.

    This article enlightened me....

    http://www.mpbrakes.com/uploads/do***ents/lowdrag.pdf

    Now what do I do?

    I can't run a newer (S10) master cylinder/booster because the booster is too damn big to fit on the firewall.

    I can't run an older 7 inch booster, with the newer master cylinder because the hole in the booster isn't large enough.

    Can the newer calipers be replaced with older style calipers?

    If so, what year/make?

    Is there a newer booster that is smaller?

    Is there another solutions?

    Offer up your opinions/thoughts/knowledge.

    Thanks in advance,
    Rich
     
  2. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,098

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    Thanks for the link. likely you are not the first to deal with this. have you talked to tech guys at mpbrakes.com & 911brakes.com?
     
  3. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    No, that's probably a good idea.

    Rich
     
  4. tudorkeith
    Joined: May 10, 2009
    Posts: 453

    tudorkeith
    Member

    My 47 has a 80 camaro clip and a 92 firebird rear. I used the master that came with the rear and made my lines in the front with a metric fitting on one end and a SAE fitting down at the rubber line. no leaks going on the 5th year. hope that helps.
     
  5. drptop70ss
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,232

    drptop70ss
    Member
    from NY

    Not all newer boosters are the large ones, there are smaller diameter dual diaphragm boosters on 87-88 monte carlos (same brakes as S10) and 93 up F bodies as well. These all use the newer style aluminum master cylinders.
     
  6. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    Good info.

    I'd really like to shy away from the newer master cylinder/booster.

    1. It's kinda ugly

    2. I've already purchased a new 7 inch dual booster and older style master cylinder.
     
  7. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    So, does anybody know of an older style caliper (non quick take up) that will fit the S10 spindle?

    If there is such a thing, I think my problems would be solved.

    Rich
     
  8. cleatus
    Joined: Mar 1, 2002
    Posts: 2,277

    cleatus
    Member
    from Sacramento

    I wish I could remember the exact caliper & part #, but I believe it was something like a 78 Monte Carlo.
    Take your current calipers from the S10 to the auto parts store and have them give you a set from a 78 Monte and compare them.
    When I went through this whole dilemma, I did this and found calipers that were identical in every way (even the casting #) but were from a year prior to the 'quick-uptake' design. I bolted them up and sure enough, fixed the problem instantly.
     
  9. FOURTYDLX
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 712

    FOURTYDLX
    Member

    My fourty has s10 calipers,7' booster,under the floor tci pedals,67 mustang master,i'm 4disk, brakes, Les but they also have mustang 2 disk. Hope this helps.
     
  10. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member


    Thanks Cleatus.

    From what I have been able to determine, GM came out with the "metric" caliper in the 78 Monte Carlo. But they didn't switch to the "quick take up" on these calipers until 1980.

    Rich
     
  11. I would look in a street rod catalog for a mini booster and master for the late model brakes.

    or maybe you can go with a hydroboost system. I am working on one now on a '48 Lincoln. They are a pretty cool setup. Won't work of course if you don't have power steering, maybe you could just mount the pump and byp*** what is needed for the power steering box.
     
  12. fms427
    Joined: Nov 17, 2006
    Posts: 865

    fms427
    Member

    Don't be confused - its simple! The only difference in the QTU calipers was the seal design, which provided more piston retraction force to pull the pads away from the rotors to reduce brake drag. The QTU master provided an initial slug of fluid to quickly take up the extra retraction to avoid a low pedal.

    Any metric caliper is the same except for the seal - so use a pre-90 metric caliper. Its been a while ( I was the brake engineer....), so I can't remember if the machined groove in the caliper body was changed - perhaps all you need to do is rebuild the caliper with the earlier seal - I might try that and see how my pedal is.
     
  13. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member


    I believe you meant pre-80.

    Don't confuse me anymore than I already am :)

    Rich
     
  14. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    Just throwing this out there....

    On my 49 GMC, I'm running a newer MC (QTU) and big brake kit (70 Camaro calipers I think - non QTU) on a MII suspension, and it has EXCELLENT brakes.

    I've autocrossed this truck, and it did quite well.

    Rich
     
  15. AfterhoursFab
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 30

    AfterhoursFab
    Member
    from NJ

    I deal with S10s a lot..use the stock calipers from the 90 S10 and a master from a 98-04 S10, it has the smaller bore that will fit any aftermarket booster, 9", 8", 7" what have you. Youll also need a proportioning valve of some sort depending on your rear brakes. The 96 and older S10s had them hanging under the master.
     
  16. drptop70ss
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,232

    drptop70ss
    Member
    from NY

    Just checked the rockauto catalog because I was curious, but they list the same PN calipers for a 1978 and 1988 monte carlo, so they must all be quick take up units? Or not? Anyone know when they came into use for sure? If 1980 was the crossover year I bet you would still get a quick take up caliper due to the fewer amount of early cores being out there. Rockauto does show a different master cylinder PN for a 78 vs 88.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2012
  17. fms427
    Joined: Nov 17, 2006
    Posts: 865

    fms427
    Member

    OOPS - sorry, meant pre-80. I suspect the aftermarket services all with the non-QTU design - will work with the QTU master, and increase in drag not significant on an olded car.
     
  18. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,960

    the-rodster
    Member

    So, I'm thinking 78 Monte Carlo calipers and old style GM master cylinder and booster.

    Should I still run the S10 proportioning valve?

    No prop valve?

    Is there a difference between prop valves used on QTU MC vs. non QTU MC ?

    I really do appreciate the input,
    Rich
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  19. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    G body (later Monte) and S10 share many front suspension and brake parts.There's quite a few master cylinders and boosters available.Best booster is a single diaphram but it's larger diameter. The smaller dual diaphram booster is often too sensitive for many drivers.
    I don't think you need a booster if using a one inch bore master cylinder. Many guys,me too, run GM disc brake retro fits with no booster.The brakes take a bit of foot push but nothing serious.
     
  20. carlos
    Joined: May 2, 2005
    Posts: 1,388

    carlos
    Member
    from ohio

  21. fms427
    Joined: Nov 17, 2006
    Posts: 865

    fms427
    Member

    Prop Valves are the same. I'd use a prop valve from a car - the S-10 uses a low pressure cut-off because of the light rear end (250 psi vs: 350-430 psi for a car). Personally, I usually use an adjustible prop valve and taylor it to the car.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.