Register now to get rid of these ads!

Totally anal master cylinder question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by CptStickfigure, Jul 7, 2005.

  1. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    I took my truck ('64 Chevy C10) in to a local mechanic for a good once over and to fix a bunch of minor problems. No **** about not doing it myself, please. I need it done quickly and done right the first time. I have to choose one or the other if I do my own work.

    Anyway, one of the things I wanted done was to swap in a two-pot master cylinder. Manual, drums all around. (Swapping in discs later, but that's later.) I brought him a bolt-in replacement master cylinder and a couple of 10 pound residual pressure valves, which is what MP Brakes recommended. He said he'd feel a lot more comfortable with a combination valve or proportioning valve and a switch connected to a dashboard light that would tell you if your brakes were failing. Problem is, he's having trouble finding what he's looking for.

    So on one hand, I have a very reputable, by-the-book mechanic.
    On the other hand, I have MP Brakes, who I've had mixed luck with, but works with custom applications.

    Anybody know what I should be looking for?
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,983

    squirrel
    Member

    when I did my 66 suburban, I just put in a dual m/c for a 68 pickup, and plumbed separage lines to front/rear. No valves or idiot lights of any kind. Worked fine.

    Most drum/drum master cylinders have the residual pressure valves built in...they hide under the br*** inserts that the lines seat against.
     
  3. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    Yeah, I should clarify that I'm not worried about the idiot lights and I know most people just run new lines, skip the combination valve, and have no problems.

    Problem is, I don't know enough about brakes to contradict my mechanic (whose reputation is on the line) with any degree of certainty.

    I guess what I'm really looking for is information on GM's factory setup. When did they add the combination valves? Which cars/trucks did they come on? Was it just on the disc/drum cars or did the drum/drum setups have it? How do I know if the MC I just bought includes the residual pressure valves? Anything official to move it out of the realm of "my cousin did this once and it worked fine," know what I mean?
     
  4. hell_fish_65
    Joined: Aug 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,165

    hell_fish_65
    Member
    from Elgin TX

    If its all drum, why would it need a proportioning valve? If anything, it just needs a distrabution block. A p-valve is needed for disc brum setups since disc and drums both use different pressures.
     
  5. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,791

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You would also be able to tell right away if you have a problem in one of the front or rear circuits as the brake pedal will be different height, as in lower to the floor.
     
  6. mikes51
    Joined: Oct 4, 2001
    Posts: 2,195

    mikes51
    Member

    I agree with that. Sounds like a case of upward delegation, in the rodding world. You want a certain setup, your mechanic doesn't want to do it that way. He doesn't have a solution but will do it if you do all the legwork and find the solution (if one exists to his satisfaction).

    You might have better luck taking it to a reputable rod shop. Your mechanic may be too worried about liability issues.

    Another reason why so many HAMBer's do their own work.
     
  7. phatn40
    Joined: Jul 6, 2005
    Posts: 18

    phatn40
    Member
    from Illinois

    I have had good luck over the years with your set up, but the front and rear will have different pressures and volume. It may be necessary to run different size tubing to the rear. As stated before, you won't need a proportioning valve with drums at all four corners.
     
  8. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    My thoughts exactly, but like I said, I'm still new at this and don't want to dismiss what he's saying without considering it.

    Back to the combination valve, let me see if I've got my **** straight before I try to talk to him. The more times I change my story, the less likely he'll be to believe me.

    My understanding is that the combination valve keeps the front brakes from applying until the rear brakes have had a chance to kick in (metering), keeps the rear wheels from locking up under heavy braking (proportioning), and keeps the shoes close to the drums (residual pressure).

    Now, I understand why the different pressures in a disc/drum setup would force you to use these valves. Otherwise, the discs would activate at very low pressure before the drums even kicked in, right? So I get why that wouldn't be an issue if front and back worked at the same pressures.

    What I don't get is why weight transfer doesn't affect rear wheel lockup with a drum/drum setup. I mean, the rear is going to unload a little during a panic stop no matter what, so why don't the rear wheels lock first? Or do they, and it's just not noticeable enough to be a problem?
     
  9. mikes51
    Joined: Oct 4, 2001
    Posts: 2,195

    mikes51
    Member

    The bores of the front wheel cylinder are larger than the bores of the rear wheel cylinders. Resulting in less force being applied to the rear brakes than the front.
     
  10. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    Oh! Well that makes sense.
    I even knew about the wheel cylinder bores and never made the connection.
     
  11. Flingdingo
    Joined: Jun 30, 2005
    Posts: 539

    Flingdingo
    Member

    MP recommends the 10lb valves because most hot rods use an under floor MC, where you need the valve to keep fluid from running back into the MC. You should be fine just running the lines.
     
  12. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    That's what I thought originally, but the MP guy was pretty insistent.
     
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,983

    squirrel
    Member

    as for when/why the valves came into being, check the federal new vehicle regulations for 1968/69 cars, you'll see they specified an idiot light and a dual master cylinder (separate front/rear brake systems).

    Combination valves were just the cost effective way to get the idiot light to work, and do all the other stuff that was needed.

    To see if the m/c has residual valves, poke in the tube seats with a paperclip and see if you feel a rubber valve in there.
     
  14. Frizby
    Joined: Jun 14, 2005
    Posts: 192

    Frizby
    Member
    from Cisco, Il

    What's up this is your buddy in cisco. The dirty bum that sold you the front end for your chevy. I don't know alot about brakes either other than that is what the middle pedal is for. i do know that if you do ron the proportioning valve up on the booster you have to be carefull about which one you use. If your getting it out of a yard it has to be from a vehicle with compareable size to your truck like a 1/2 ton truck. If you want to or need to go that route I think I have one for a 77 chevy scottsdale with the switch right on it. You can have it if you want it. If you want to totally ignore what I just said that's cool to. Don't hesitate to ask if you need any original part for the chevy( i.e. motormounts!).

    If your not doing anything on Sunday come down to Plowboys he's having some Hambers over. Haven't seen you around in awhile.
     
  15. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    Hey! I remember you! Check it out: old crossmember's out and the new one's in. Just need to run new brake lines.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Yeah, I'm getting better about asking if people have parts. Not sure if the 77 MC and switch would work, though. I forget the exact year, but I know GM had switched to disc/drum by '72, and mine's all drum.

    I'm going in to talk to him this afternoon. I'll probably take another crack at getting him to skip the switch.

    I'll be there.
     
  16. Plowboy
    Joined: Nov 8, 2002
    Posts: 4,282

    Plowboy
    Member

    Yeah, and bring me those spindles! ha ha ha
     
  17. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,983

    squirrel
    Member

    chevy 1/2 ton pickups switched to 5 lug wheels and disk brakes in 71.
     
  18. CptStickfigure
    Joined: Feb 11, 2004
    Posts: 496

    CptStickfigure
    Member
    from Urbana, IL

    They're all bagged up and ready to go.

    Just to follow up, I stopped by the mechanic's today to figure out what the hell we were going to do. First thing he told me was that I have a little lizard living somewhere in my truck. Must have followed me back from Florida.

    Anyway, it looks like we had a difference in terminology more than anything else. I sketched what I was thinking, he sketched what he was thinking, and they were pretty similar. He agreed to do it my way if I'd agree to give his way a shot first. I picked a valve out of an old GMC 4000 for a couple of dollars. Only manual drum setup in the whole yard. Might work, might not, but it made him a lot more comfortable to try it.
     
  19. Noting the incredibly high readership of this dry post, we're on to your subliminal tricks: "**** master"?

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.