Register now to get rid of these ads!

Shackle problem

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Hellfish, Jun 11, 2012.

  1. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    I have a 65 Econoline.
    Originally the rear leaf springs sat a few inches outboard of the frame rails, but since mine was rusted to pieces, I decided to move the springs to directly below the frame rails (which I boxed in with 3/16" plate).

    The old light duty springs were flattened out and sagging, so I replaced them with heavy duty (extra leaves) springs from another 65 Econo.

    [​IMG]

    In order to clear a few things in the rear, I decided to drop the shackle mounting point down almost 2". This made the van sit higher than I wanted, so we put the axle on top of the springs, instead of below them as they were from the factory. This lowered it 2", back to the original height.

    Here's the problem. The shackle sits at a severe angle. Why? The spring mounting points are all the same, and the springs actually have more arch to them, so their shorter. Stock shackles.

    Would flipping the axle on to the top of the springs cause this? That's the only thing I can think of, unless maybe the heavy duty springs were also somewhat longer (but ALL parts interchange, so I doubt it). What can I do about it? I was really hoping to have this on the track THIS Saturday.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Yes, it's also hitting my fuel filler hose, but I can correct that. A bigger concern is what to do about the shackle.
     
  2. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member

    the new spring is longer than the old ones. can you shift the front mount foward and drill a new guide hole in the spring perch on the axle to compensate?
     
  3. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    Moving the front perch would be quite a lot of work. I could drill a new hole that might move the spring forward an inch. Would an inch be enough?

    [​IMG]

    The spring pads are from Currie and look like this. I could drill new holes if I needed to.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member

    an inch probably wouldnt help much.

    Haw about reusing your old main leaf but restacking it with the other leafs from the new stack? not a permenant fix but would get you thru the weekend.
     
  5. Or move the shackle back and inch or so. Either will fill the bill.
     
  6. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    Jogyver has been helping me a ton with this. I think he's already working on a plan to move the shackle back. This, of course, will mean cutting a hole in that rear rocker pan (and figuring out a new path for the fuel filler). If the shackle is moved back further, it can only go so far through that rocker pan before it hits the roll pan on the other side, and then the bumper. :(

    The old leaves were in bad shape. Many were cracked. I think the main is ok, but it took me many hours to get the bushings out of the good springs. I'd hate to think how long it would take to get them out of the bad, rusty ones. :)
     
  7. iammarvin
    Joined: Oct 7, 2009
    Posts: 1,196

    iammarvin
    BANNED
    from Tulare, Ca

    Have new main spring made to the correct lengh, cheaper then you would think.
     
  8. Terry O
    Joined: Oct 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,060

    Terry O
    Member

    Sounds like this is getting complicated and expensive at least in time invested.
    An option I would consider would be to talk with the good people at Eaton ( http://www.eatonsprings.com/) and see what they have to say. Might be worth it to have them make up springs that would fit your set up as it is now. I've found them to be reasonable and helpful in difficult applications.

    Terry
     
  9. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    Actually, I asked about that before I found these HD springs. The shop I talked to (that was recommended by several people) said that they could not do it. I have no idea why. They're 2.25 wide. Maybe I'll have to call them again.

    If they decide they can do it, how would I measure the correct length?

    Keep in mind that these springs actually are the correct springs for this van, this year, just HD whereas I had lightweight ones before. I have no idea why they're longer. Pretty much everything Econoline is interchangeable, at least within the same year.
     
  10. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    I haven't talked to Eaton yet, but I did talk to a local shop that is part of a larger network of spring shops that do custom work
     
  11. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    I just talked to Spring-Align again and they say they MIGHT be able make a shorter spring, but would need to see it in person. They looked the spring up in their books and confirmed that all Econo springs should be the same length.
     
  12. ryno
    Joined: Oct 6, 2005
    Posts: 3,469

    ryno
    Member

    This may sound stupid,but is there a front and rear to the spring pack them self. Meaning is your center pin exactly the same distance from each eye?

    Maybe there in wrong. ..?
     
  13. Chris F100
    Joined: Dec 7, 2011
    Posts: 119

    Chris F100
    Member

    ^^^
    not as stupid as it sounds. My F100 had an almost 3 inch front to rear bias....
     
  14. goose-em
    Joined: Aug 23, 2008
    Posts: 349

    goose-em
    Member
    from Louisiana

    based on the springs in the above photos I would say that bias is the issue.
     
  15. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    There is a bias similar to the F100, but if I flip it around, the wheel is way, way off center. I originally put the bushings in the wrong end, so I know what it looks like with the bias at the wrong end. :)
     
  16. mrconcdid
    Joined: Aug 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,156

    mrconcdid
    Member
    from Florida

    its not spring bias, its length of spring, its wrong, I see 3 options all mentioned here

    1.restack your pack using the old main leaf
    2.move front spring hanger forward and or the rear hanger backwards
    3. return the springs and get the correct length

    I like restacking the old main as a cheap option, or purchase a main that is shorter and build it up with the pack you have.

    Godspeed
    MrC.
     
  17. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Looks like the centering bolts in your pictures are in two different locations. The old springs look biased and the new springs look nearly centered.
     
  18. flt-blk
    Joined: Jun 25, 2002
    Posts: 4,941

    flt-blk
    Member
    from IL

    It's hard to tell in the picture, are the springs different lengths?
     
  19. bobwop
    Joined: Jan 13, 2008
    Posts: 6,136

    bobwop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Arley, AL

    find somebody with a press (Hotrod C&C?) and have them put more arch in the springs.
     
  20. I was wondering the same thing, and the centre bolt definatly is wrong, centred when it should be offset like the original.
     
  21. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    The springs in the pics aren't right. I actually pressed the bushing in the wrong end (as I said above), but popped it out and put it in the right end before installation. There's definitely a bias in both springs.

    I have to measure the lengths tonight. I don't know if I'll get an accurate measurement of the installed springs without pulling them.
     
  22. palosfv3
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,541

    palosfv3
    Member

    What was the original measurement of the center line on the spring front mounting bolt hole to the center line of rear shackle pivot hole ? How or what did you use for reference to position the front and rear spring mounting brackets and holes squarely on the rails ?

    Just checking on this before you go through all the trouble of bending up new leaf springs and all that kind of thing . Only to find the differential slightly out of square in the ch***is.
     
  23. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    Jogyver did most of the setting up and measuring, so he will be able to answer that better than I can. I do know that it was carefully done and looking at my old photos as reference, all the new pieces appear to be in the same places (obviously not scientific, but there's nothing that stands out as being off).

    I am also sure that the new mounts are square on the frame and that the rear is centered properly. I helped with centering the rear and that took a long time.
     
  24. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    I double-checked and the spring mounting points and they are definitely correctly placed.

    I re-measured both sets of springs carefully and properly. They are nearly exactly the same.

    [​IMG]

    Straight across eye-to-eye length = 46"
    Front to center = ~20.25
    Rear to center = ~25

    I didn't measure the spring length following the curve but the difference is obvious. Because the HD springs have a greater arch to them, their overall length is longer (following the curve, rather that straight across eye-to-eye).

    Unloaded, both springs are 46" straight across, eye-to-eye, BUT LOADED, the HD springs are about 47.5", thus pushing the shackle back too far. The original LD (light duty) springs are virtually flat so probably do not stretch much under load. I couldn't measure them under load (see below).

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    I decided to test that theory and probably swap in the old springs. I pressed out the whole bushing expecting to press one of my new ones back in.

    The old (LD) spring eye is MUCH larger than the replacement HD ones... like 1.125 vs 1.50-1.625. Same year van - 1965! Here are the old springs and new bushing. Note the size difference, and that the outer sheath/shell of the old bushing is still in there. Also note that the eye is no longer round. That smaller bushing fit perfectly into the HD springs and is the ONLY bushing listed by anyone for a 61-67 Econo that I could find. The shackle end eye is the same on both sets of springs.

    I may slip the new bushing in and install the spring just to see, but that may be a little dangerous. Bolted in it should be ok, just for a quick test under load/weight. If it turns out OK, maybe I can have Spring-Align make me a new main leaf to the old spring specs, BUT with the eye size of the new/HD springs with the common bushing size. I'll have to take both sets in for an in-person chat with them.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    For reference, here's the new/HD spring shackles unloaded (van on jack stands)

    Longer shackles might help some, so might boomerang shackles.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Right side, inside
    [​IMG]

    Here's another shot of the front mount that also shows the rebuilt rocker-to-frame rail box
    [​IMG]

    Rear end flipped
    [​IMG]
     
  25. palosfv3
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,541

    palosfv3
    Member

    Is there any reason not to try things as they are ? The only concern may be that the rear spring shackle arc may cause the spring rear pocket to contact the mounting. ( I'm sure you could just trim the bracket a little bit to clear ). From the pics it looks like it will clear but not by much. Just looking at a couple of leaf spring vehicles around here , most rear eyelets are about a 1/2" aft of the upper mount hole center line. This needs to be slightly rearward . If it were directly below it would cause handling issues . Whether it a 1/2" back or 1' back should not be a big issue as the rear of the spring must float and the rear eyelet should not be directly beneath or forward of the rear spring mount hole center line .
     
  26. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    No, I don't want the shackle completely vertical.

    I suppose you're right. It could be run as is with some t*******. However, there is very little suspension travel right now. Even with t*******, the spring is likely to make contact with the pocket and possibly the frame rail, and definitely with the filler hose. That shouldn't be.

    With the new springs unloaded, the shackle angle is at about what the angle was with the old springs loaded. In other words, the new spring is stretching out a lot more, thus causing me grief. :)

    Van on the ground
    [​IMG]

    van on stands, wheels free
    [​IMG]

    Old springs, old location, van on the ground. Notice the shackle angle.

    [​IMG]
     
  27. palosfv3
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,541

    palosfv3
    Member

    JFWIW

    http://www.quadratec.com/jeep_knowledgebase/article-93.htm
    Shackle Length and Their Impact on Spring Movement

    <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> Lets discuss shackles with leaf spring suspensions:


    1. What do we need shackles for in the first place
    2. Pros/cons of longer/shorter than stock
    3. How longer/shorter shackles affect wheel travel
    4. How to determine the proper length of shackle for your setup
    5. Shackle inversion (it&#8217;s a bad thing)
    6. Bracing
    7. Shackle shape and what it does
    8. Shackle Mechanics


    What do we need shackles for in the first place?
    Simple, to allow for length changes of a leaf spring. A leaf spring suspension is a pretty simple thing, leafs position the axle under the vehicle, and supports the weight of the vehicle. As a leaf spring flexes up or down, its length from eye to eye changes. Since one end is mounted solidly, and cant move, all the length change happens at one end, which has a shackle between the spring and frame to allow for movement.
    What are the pros/cons of different shackle lengths?
    In relation to stock length, there are a bunch of things affected when you change shackle lengths.
    A longer shackle will move one end of the leaf spring further away from the frame, doing several things.

    • It rotates the axle down at the shackle side of the spring.
    • It decreases castor angle of the front axle affecting the steerings stability at high speed, and reduces the steering ability to return to center after a turn.
    • It increases pinion angle
    • It increases leverage on the shackle mount
    • It increases droop (down) travel
    • It decreases approach/departure angle
    • It adds lift to the suspension in the amount of half the difference between the new shackle and the original shackle. Example: stock YJ shackle is 4&#8221; from bolt to bolt; replacing it with a shackle 6&#8221; from bolt to bolt will provide 1&#8221; of lift)
    While some of these can be good things, and some bad, it depends on your setup which one is which. If you&#8217;re starting a build, then these traits can be accounted for and made to work to your advantage when it comes to fine tuning a suspension to get maximum performance from it, which brings us to&#8230;
    How do longer/shorter shackles affect wheel travel?
    Bear with me here, this digs a little deeper into how leaf spring suspensions work. To start with, a shackles length can dictate overall travel, both droop and compression. Let&#8217;s start with the leaf spring. Stock jeep leaf springs sit pretty flat with the load of the jeep on em, not so with lift springs since they have a larger arch in order to provide that lift. Since lift springs are designed to bolt in with no changes to the mounts, the eye to eye dimension of the spring is the same as stock, but with the additional arch, the main leaf of the spring pack is actually quite a bit longer. So, in order for a lift spring to compress all the way to being flat, the eye to eye dimension is going to be greater than the stock spring. If the shackle is not long enough to allow this to happen, the spring will bind before it gets flat, if force is applied after this bind point, the spring pack will flex into a W shape, fatiguing the springs and shortening their lifespan.
    How a shackle affects droop travel is a bit easier to picture. When a spring droops, it will do so until its eye to eye dimension is limited, it hits this limit when the shackle is in line with the arch of the main leaf of the spring. A longer shackle will allow for more droop travel since when it reaches the max droop angle, the shackle end of the spring will be further away from the frame then it was with the stock length shackle.
    [​IMG]In the this picture you can see the shackle closest to the camera is almost at its maximum droop travel, its almost in line with the leaf spring. You can also see just how much a shackle has to move to allow for suspension travel. Now we get to figure out just how long a shackle needs to be to work properly with our suspension setup. Its best to start this while actually installing a lift, or whatever other work you may do that involves taking apart your suspension. Get a length of string, any ole string will do, its just going to be our measuring stick for this operation. Tie it to the fixed spring mounting bolt, good and tight so it wont come off. Now, lay the string along the main leaf of the spring so it follows the arch. Mark the string where the shackle bolt would p*** through the spring eye. You now have the total length of the main leaf. Pull the string tight, and rotate your shackle forward and see if it reaches the mark you made for spring length at a 45-50 degree angle. If it doesn&#8217;t, then measure from the mark on the string to the shackle mount, and this is how long you need the shackle to be for your suspension. Be aware of the other things a longer shackle will do to your suspension, and be able to account for them when you make the change.

    What the heck is shackle inversion, and why is it a bad thing?

    Shackle inversion usually happens on the front of jeep YJ&#8217;s and CJ&#8217;s when the suspension is drooping to its maximum point. As we discussed earlier, this is when the shackle is in line with the arch of the main leaf of the spring pack. While at this point, if something hits the shackle while moving forward, its possible, and probable, that the shackle will fold backwards instead of returning to its normal position when weight is put back on the wheel. The shackle folding back against the frame, shortens the eye to eye length of the spring, possibly bending it. Shackle inversion is usually pretty simple to remedy, a lever of some kind is used to pry the shackle away from the frame and past the point of max droop, and then the spring will do its job and spring back to where it should be. Be careful tho, as the spring attempts to spring back, it has some stored energy that will be released pretty quick like, possibly taking your lever and throwing it into the woods. Shackle inversion can be avoided by installing stops on the frame to limit the shackles travel, or designing a stop into the shackle itself. Some folks use boomerang shackles in the front with the short leg at the frame end so that the center brace acts as a stop, but its not what boomerang shackles were designed for, we&#8217;ll get to that in a minute.
    Why do some shackles have braces welded in while others don&#8217;t?
    Bracing between the two sides of a shackle can help or hurt, depending on what your goals are. To explain we&#8217;ll have to go back to how a leaf spring works a bit more. As the axle attached to the springs articulates (one side in compression, the other side in droop), the spring still has to do its two jobs, locating the axle, and supporting the weight of the vehicle. As the axle twists, the springs must change length, as well as twist with the axle. That&#8217;s the reason for rubber or polyurethane bushings in the spring eyes, they allow the spring to twist in relation to the bolts holding it in place. While this twisting is taking place, the sides of the shackle will also move a bit in relation to the spring, one side being slightly ahead of the other as its pushed by the bushing. Adding a brace (or a bolt with sleeve) between the two sides of the shackle will stop the shackle from twisting forcing the bushing to do more work, and transferring some of the twisting force to the shackle mounting point on the frame. Remember I said a shackle brace can help or hurt depending on your goals? If your goal is road handling like a sports car (don&#8217;t know why you would want this from a jeep, but whatever), then the brace is a good thing as it will help to firm up the suspension as the body rolls around corners. If your looking for the last bit of available wheel travel, then the solid braced shackle can hurt a bit. When is a braced shackle really needed? When the shackle length increases over about one inch over stock. As the sides of the shackle get longer, they will flex between the bolts as force is applied to them, adding a brace will reduce this flex, which can be a huge negative with long shackles, as they induce a vague feeling to the handling and allow the springs side to side movement to increase.
    Now on to shackle shapes, and how they affect things.
    Up until a few years ago, shackles were simple, strait pieces of metal, then came the tow shackle, and the boomerang shackle. The tow shackle is pretty simple, still 2 pieces of metal, but provisions have been made to allow the hookup of a tow bar for flat towing. Sometimes they are run backwards so that the tow bar attachment point is towards the axle of the vehicle, and with the pin installed will act as a shackle stop to reduce the chance of shackle inversion. The boomerang shackle was origionally designed for the rear of YJ&#8217;s. In the rear of YJ&#8217;s with lift springs, as the suspension compresses, the longer length of the main leaf and the added travel the shackle has to account for it would cause the shackle to contact the rear cross member limiting travel. Back in the day, before boomerang shackles, we&#8217;d just notch the crossmember where the shackle hit and things would be good. The boomerang shackle was just a bit more BLING way of getting around the problem. Boomerang shackles are also used by some in a front application with the short leg towards the frame to counter shackle inversion. Some mistakenly think that the different shape of the boomerang shackle will alter the angle of the shackle or how it travels through its range of movement. This is not true, the shackles angle is measured in a strait line between its mounting points, it can be a boomerang, zig zag, strait, or round, the shape does not change the angle of the shackle. On an unrelated note, this is why bent drag links and trac bars don&#8217;t change bump steer, the mounting points dictate the angle, not the shape of the bar.
    Shackle Mechanics


    The angle of the shackle can stiffen or soften a spring's normal rate. You can determine the effective angle of a shackle by drawing a line through the middle of both spring eyes and a line through the shackle pivots. Then measure the angle formed by the two lines (measure ahead of the shackle - see illus. 3). You can increase the effective rate of a leaf spring by decreasing the shackle angle. An increase in shackle angle will produce a decrease in the effective leaf spring rate of a leaf spring. [​IMG]
    A good starting point for shackle angle is 90 degrees. In this position the shackle has no effect on spring rate. Keep in mind that the shackle angle changes (and consequently the spring's effective rate changes) whenever the suspension moves. Also, the shackle's angle will change whenever you change the ch***is' ride height, the arch of the leaf, the load on the leaf, or the length of the shackle. Since the shackle direction changes when the leaf is deflected past a flat condition, you should avoid deflecting the right rear leaf to an extremely negative arch condition. This could cause a very large shackle angle at high loads and consequently a very soft spring rate. Excessive body roll and poor handling could result. You can correct this problem by decreasing the shackle angle, increasing the arch, of the spring by increasing the rate of the right rear leaf spring.
    Shackle length is another factor affecting the rate of a leaf spring. A short shackle will change its angle (and the effective rate of the leaf spring) quicker than a long shackle upon deflection of the leaf. There is a second shackle effect on the stiffness of the rear suspension that counteracts and sometimes exceeds the shackle?s effect on spring rate. This second effect occurs whenever the shackle swings in its arc and moves the rear spring eye vertically.[​IMG]
    The vertical movement of the rear spring eye causes a jacking effect. If the shackle movement forces the rear spring eye downward, the leaf will deflect and exert an upward force on the ch***is that will add stiffness to the rear suspension. Conversely, the shackle will reduce suspension stiffness if t causes the rear spring eye to move upward during suspension travel.
    The stiffening effect occurs during suspension deflection whenever the rear spring eye is ahead of the upper shackle pivot and the shackle is moving rearward (see illus. 4, example B). In this position, however, the shackle also produces a softening effect by reducing the effective rate of the leaf spring (due to the large shackle angle). The overall effect to the stiffness of the rear suspension is determined by the greater of the two shackle effects. Under opposite conditions, you can expect a reversal to the above effects. If the rear spring eye is located behind the shackle pivot (illus. 4 example A) the shackle effect will tend to reduce suspension stiffness whenever the shackle moves rearward. However, the small shackle angle will tend to stiffen the spring's rate. The overall effect to the suspension's stiffness is determined by the more dominant of the two shackle effects. Keep in mind that the movement of the rear spring eye (from its static position) is mostly forward under racing conditions.
    If a leaf goes into negative arch the travel direction of the shackle changes and the shackle effects change. Handling is not consistent under these conditions.
    The second effect of the shackle can be enhanced by increasing the length of the shackle. Generally, the second shackle effect (jacking)is dominant.
     
  28. greg32
    Joined: Jun 21, 2007
    Posts: 2,266

    greg32
    Member
    from Indiana

    Larry, too much information! Heres what I see, if you want to leave the front and rear mounting points were they are[cant move the rear one anyway, no room], you need a spring thats shorter, have to measure closely but look like 1 1/2 to 2 inches in photos. Id call eaton or posies and get the right spring, done. We just went thru a similar issue with a buggy rear on a 32 with a wider 46 rear end, just get the correct spring.
     
  29. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    I have the right springs, for the right vehicle... but I think I was putting front springs on the rear. :) I have all 4 sets of springs, and they look very similar with very similar measurements... but the fronts are slightly longer with a smaller bushing/fixed end... like what I was trying to fit on the rear.
     
  30. ryno
    Joined: Oct 6, 2005
    Posts: 3,469

    ryno
    Member

    That sounds extremely frustrating!
    Glad you figured it out
    You gonna make it to the drags then?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.