Register now to get rid of these ads!

Input needed

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by murfman, Aug 23, 2012.

?
  1. Go for it

    38 vote(s)
    24.8%
  2. Keep looking

    115 vote(s)
    75.2%
  1. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

  2. rob-redm
    Joined: Nov 15, 2005
    Posts: 6,561

    rob-redm
    Member

    VW Type 3, keep looking !
     
  3. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    LOVE type IIIs! I've had 7 of the things, but in this case it's just not quite the right angle. I'd keep looking, and try to find the stock fold down articulated stuff that moves with the tailgate. It doesn't get much cooler than that.
     
  4. Master of None
    Joined: Dec 18, 2009
    Posts: 2,279

    Master of None
    Member

    I'm not saying it looks bad, I just don't think it really adds to the flow of the suburban. I think (which who cares what I think) a more pointy like 56 Chevy tail light slightly frenched would look better.
     
  5. redlinetoys
    Joined: May 18, 2004
    Posts: 4,302

    redlinetoys
    Member
    from Midwest

    I think you could get them to fit and blend in nicely. But... they look really euro and really take away from the USA 50's flavor of your vintage vehicle (to me anyway...)
     
  6. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    Couple of shots with the tailgate on:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Not sure it is what I want BUT it looks much better than the stockers.

    Anyone got pictures of custom tails on a 53-54 'Burban?

    I was thinking 55 Chev, or early 50's Caddilac, but I don't think they would look all that different.
     
  7. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I'm a Jeep guy, who needs doors?
     
  8. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,357

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    That last photo in post #36 of the stock quarter panel/taillight gave me an idea......try a '52/'53 Mercury taillight/housing..........it would really flow with the rounded top of the quarter panel and merge with the fender contour at the base of the stock tailllight.

    In stock form the Merc lamps have a chromed bezel, kinda m***ive, but if stripped and painted...............

    Ray
     
  9. liljonny
    Joined: Aug 31, 2011
    Posts: 203

    liljonny
    Member
    from menifee,ca

    Try 56 lincoln premiere upside downer. Ooo custom!
     
  10. damagedduck
    Joined: Jun 16, 2011
    Posts: 2,341

    damagedduck
    Member
    from Greeley Co

    Somebody said 55 chevy..how about 55 Pontiac wagon? or 59 Rambler?
     

    Attached Files:

  11. LSR 2909
    Joined: May 10, 2012
    Posts: 607

    LSR 2909
    Member
    from Colorado

    I like the stock ones better, but if you have to use those, pull them in a little bit forward.
     
  12. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    The rounded bottoms of the Merc and Rambler pose a problem with the body line that wraps around the quarter. I need something with a relatively flat bottom.

    Those Pontiac tails are hideous.
     
  13. CARCUTTER
    Joined: Sep 19, 2007
    Posts: 103

    CARCUTTER
    Member
    from MASS

    Speedway has some "cat eyes" but you will have to make the housing.
    That way you could also bring it back into the body so it didnt look extended out so far.
     
  14. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I had a set, and the shape was right, but they were way too tall, If I cut the quarter all the way down to the bumper they would fit, but I'd end up with a 52 Merc wagon at that point.:D
     
  15. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member


    Yeah, I saw those, I just wish they had 1 flat end.
     
  16. 59Apachegail
    Joined: Apr 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,508

    59Apachegail
    Member
    from New York

    x2 for the Mercs, cut the bottoms off the lights
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 24, 2012
  17. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,357

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL



    As I recall, on those '52/'53 Merc unit the light itself is nowhere near as tall as the housing (bezel).....would it be feasible to shorten the housing at the bottom? That would also yield a bezel a bit narrower at the bottom as it is tapered..........not trying 'push' this idea...just thought the shape works with the quarter panel........

    Ray
     
  18. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I had a pair, and the bezel that unscrews from the housing is just that, a bezel. The entire housing and reflector ***embly is one piece, and it is too tall. I guess I could fab up some reflector housings and just use the Merc lens and chrome bezel, but it would take a bunch of work and I'm not sure I would be able to get the reflector shape right to keep the lights bright and evenly lit.
     
  19. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I have been looking a the 57 and 58 Chrysler tail lenses (without the whole housing, just the lens) as well, but I don't know if they would look all that different than the VW ones when all is said and done.
     
  20. young'n'poor
    Joined: Jan 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,281

    young'n'poor
    Member
    from Anoka. MN

  21. Take a look at `59 Consul (British Ford) Wikipedia has a rear view....I`m computer challenged so no link, ...sorry
     
  22. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,779

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I guess I'm in the minority but I think they look good and actually blend in with the overall look of the wagon.

    BTW,I wouldn't rely on the collective opinions of the hamb members which includes mine to make your decision,after all,It's your car. HRP
     
  23. tb33anda3rd
    Joined: Oct 8, 2010
    Posts: 17,584

    tb33anda3rd
    Member

    actually after looking at all the different views, if the roof was chopped and the back pillar was slanted forward it would work perfect.
     
  24. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I hear ya, The more I look at it the more I like it, the lamp fits the body well. So far I haven't seen anything I like more.
     
  25. dad-bud
    Joined: Aug 22, 2009
    Posts: 3,884

    dad-bud
    Member

    Sorry but it looks way too Volkswagenny for me.
    Nice try but keep lookin' - you asked.
     
  26. 66Newport
    Joined: Dec 12, 2008
    Posts: 2,795

    66Newport
    Member

    I kind of like it, but the way the lens sticks way out at the top kind of kills it for me. If it had a flatter lens maybe? I agree with you, I like it better than stock, just not 100$ on it. I think you are onto something just not quite there yet.
     
  27. tudorkeith
    Joined: May 10, 2009
    Posts: 453

    tudorkeith
    Member

    Who cares what we think, DO YOU LIKE IT?
     
  28. plymouth1952
    Joined: Jun 30, 2008
    Posts: 2,324

    plymouth1952
    Member

    I think they look great
     
  29. murfman
    Joined: Nov 6, 2006
    Posts: 540

    murfman
    Member

    I tucked it in about an inch and a half and raised the rear to get rid of the slope at the belt line:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    I am going to try the flat lenses before I give up on these lights:
    [​IMG]

    They use the same housing, just a flatter lens from the European market models.

    Looking at it I think the flat lens will share the same slop as the tailgate in profile. I'll see for sure when I get a lens to test fit.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.