Register now to get rid of these ads!

C3 to C6 Transmission Swap

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Orlando1701, Sep 2, 2012.

  1. Orlando1701
    Joined: May 2, 2012
    Posts: 128

    Orlando1701
    Member

    Has anyone ever done a C3 to C6 transmission swap? I found a re-man 302 police interceptor with a C6 that I want to use to replace the 200 I-6/ C3 set up currently in my 50' Ford.

    Yeah I know, for the most part around here 'If you don't know we're not going to tell you' but any help would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. OLDSMAN
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,422

    OLDSMAN
    BANNED

    I would think that the trans would be a C-4. As far as I know the C-3 was only used behind V-6 engines in pintos, and behind 2.3 engines in the same
     
  3. With a torch and welder Know how and a whole lotta wont too. Its very simple?:eek: sounds like a good ides too me.Old wolf
     
  4. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,491

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The C3 was introduced as a lightweight 3-speed automatic for compact cars like the Ford Pinto. It was used with four cylinder, small V6, and the 200ci Inline Six engines. The final appearance of this transmission was in the 1989 Merkur XR4Ti.

    I don't believe that they can be swapped without some adapter work, as the bolt pattern radius of the C3 bellhousing, and the motors it was used with, is much smaller than the C6. One possibility is, instead of using a C6, would be to use a C4. Both the C3 and C4 have bolt on bellhousings, so if that pattern is the same, you may be able to bolt a C4 in place of the C3, keeping the C3 bellhousing. Never done it, don't know if it would work, but it'd be a lot more feasible than a C6 swap. Plus a C6 is a power hog, and takes a lot more HP to turn it's guts than a C4 takes. With a 200ci six, you don't have a lot of horsepower to spare.

    I'm not sure what Old Wolf is trying to say, he might not be fully awake yet.
     
  5. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Orlando,

    Are you swapping the whole 302 engine/trans package in? You have to be more specific to get good answers.
     
  6. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    Sounds like he's swapping out the 6 & C3 for the 302/C6. He'll probably have to make some changes to the ****** mount & the driveshaft to get the C6 in. As was mentioned, unless the 302 is really stout, like built for racing, the C6 is way more ****** than needed. C4 would be better for the typical 302. C6 was for the 4 bl 351 Cs & up.
     
  7. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    They did put a C3 behind the '80-'82 200 with the low mount starter as far as I have been told. That block uses a bell pattern that is like 2/3s of the regular small block pattern. If that is the case, he'll need to drill a couple of mounting holes transfered off of the new bell from the C6 into the back of the engine block. Then the c6 should bolt up. You're on your own as far as flex plate and such, but my bet would be on the 300 six for that. Both are zero balanced, and should be compatible with the larger ring gear.
     
  8. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,491

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yeah, now that I read it again, it seems that the thread ***le doesn't quite match the post. Sounds like a complete engine/trans swap.
     
  9. 57Custom300
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,425

    57Custom300
    Member
    from Arizona

    Sounds like a good swap. Dont know if the C6 will fit because of the large size. If I remember correctly the C3/C4 belling housing wont swap because the one on the C3 is part of the front pump.
     
  10. OLDSMAN
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,422

    OLDSMAN
    BANNED

    I stand corrected on that one. It was used behind a 200 6 cyl. The major problen with any modifications, is that the beelhousinf is also the front of the pump ***embly. This trans was also the basis for the A4LD overdrive trans used in ranger pisckups, broncoII and explorers. This transmission made me a lot of money when I was a mechanic in a Ford Dealership. This is a really light duty transmission
     
  11. Francisco Plumbero
    Joined: May 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,533

    Francisco Plumbero
    Member
    from il.

    C6 eats up to 65HP to get power to the drive shaft. You're gonna have nothing left on 200 CI engine.
     
  12. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

    When on Earth did Ford ever use a C6 behind a 302? There were smallblock C6s but I've never seen one behind anything but a 351C/351M/small-pattern 400M.
     
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,034

    squirrel
    Member

    they used them in lots of 300 powered pickups in the 80s....and that trans will bolt up to a 302.

    I wonder how much power you have to be running thru a C6 to make it eat up 65 hp? I hear the same claims about a TH400 using gobs of horsepower...yet my car will move with the engine idling, and I know it ain't making 65 hp then...
     
  14. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    The 351M had the 429/460 pattern. And...it's a 400, not 400M.
     
  15. I ***umed he was wanting to swap a 302engine and c6 trans into his car. engine& trans conversons are almost never a bolt in. But with a torch & welder anything is possible. With a torch & welder and know how + want too you can install a nail head into a 60 falcon!
     
  16. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

    Oh, I know it WILL bolt up, but my question was what Ford vehicle combination ever came that way from the factory?

    Of all the slushboxes one could choose to bolt up to a 302 it seems to me you'd have to have a very good reason to want to use a C6.
     
  17. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,034

    squirrel
    Member

  18. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

    Yeah, every now and then we run into a purist ;)
     
  19. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

  20. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    Pertially correct designation, partially correction of erronious info!:)
     
  21. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,034

    squirrel
    Member

    it aint' easy keeping Ford stuff straight....they worked really hard to make it confusing.
     
  22. Orlando1701
    Joined: May 2, 2012
    Posts: 128

    Orlando1701
    Member

    Yup whole thing is going in. That six cyclender has pissed me off for the last time.

    Yeah, that's how it came and it was free.

    I'm told this set up came out of a old cop car in some hick town in Florida. Looking at the reman numbers and how everything else is set up along with the HD C6 tran that seems to be the story.

    the 200/C3 set up is what was in the car when I got it and I only paid $1000 for the whole deal, and I knew there were problems with the Trans when I bought the thing. Yeah, its junk.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2012

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.