Register now to get rid of these ads!

What Ford motor to run?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by chronisterracing, Nov 14, 2012.

  1. chronisterracing
    Joined: Feb 27, 2010
    Posts: 139

    chronisterracing
    Member
    from N.Il.

    Ok so I have a 390 with edelbrock intake, msd distributor and fresh heads, but I hate the width of the C6 and it needs rebuilt anyways and toploaders aren't cheap for FE's.

    I have all the 302 or 351w and s/b top loaders or T5's I want (father-in-law owns a salvage yard)

    I have been offered a trade... my 390 stuff for a 351 Cleveland (got trans as I said before)

    What do ya think I should run?

    going in a model A with all tube custom ch***is.
     
  2. Cortney
    Joined: Aug 11, 2008
    Posts: 375

    Cortney
    Member

    I like the FE better
     
  3. Race City Rodz
    Joined: Nov 29, 2010
    Posts: 466

    Race City Rodz
    Member

    I agree Fe, all the way!
     
  4. dabirdguy
    Joined: Jun 23, 2005
    Posts: 2,404

    dabirdguy
    Member Emeritus

  5. derbydad276
    Joined: May 29, 2011
    Posts: 1,336

    derbydad276
    Member

    #1 what is it going in?
    #2 to install a cleveland engine might take alot of fab work to install
    #3 if its a 351m its a boat anchor compared to the F E
    #4 FE has way more GRUNT
    #5 I like using numbers
     
  6. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,922

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What body style Model A are you planing on building? HRP
     
  7. chronisterracing
    Joined: Feb 27, 2010
    Posts: 139

    chronisterracing
    Member
    from N.Il.

    Its a four door model A cut down to an extended cab, fenderless and hoodless

    Fab work is not a problem, the whole build is a fab.

    No not a M/400 or something else.

    I really want to use the 390, Wish there was an adapter for the s/b toploader to FE.
     
  8. chronisterracing
    Joined: Feb 27, 2010
    Posts: 139

    chronisterracing
    Member
    from N.Il.

  9. teddyp
    Joined: May 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,195

    teddyp
    Member

    390 or a y-block
     
  10. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,922

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    ford engines are long,,that's why I ask,I built a Model A pickup and used a 289 and half the engine was inside the cab with me. HRP
     
  11. Paulie9fingers
    Joined: May 19, 2008
    Posts: 2,430

    Paulie9fingers
    Member

    What is the problem with using the top loader you have on the FE ?

    Out of those engine choices, I'd use the FE.
     
  12. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    And the # sign ;)

    The small block Top Loader would just need an FE bellhousing and, There are two input shafts, 1 1/16" and a 1 3/8" and there are two different lengths and end diameter where it goes in the pilot bushing, so you would need to swap out for the 390 FE specific input shaft, David Kee has them and as long as it isn't a 64-65 it will have the 8 hole case. There are three different case lengths, but this really doesn't affect anything during a swap. There are also 2 output splines, 28 and 31 - 390 abnd smaller all used the 28.
    lastly there are wide ratio and close ratio, easiest way to tell is count the teeth on second gear, 28 tooth is a close ratio, 31 tooth is a wide ratio.

    Personally I'd take the Cleveland over an FE - and I have one of each, a 4V 351C and a 416" FE in my truck.
     
  13. You want the one with Fire Power valve covers
     
  14. nickk
    Joined: Feb 2, 2011
    Posts: 754

    nickk
    Member

    FE motors was my first love, 390 for sure out of what you have!
     
  15. motorhead748
    Joined: Apr 23, 2007
    Posts: 70

    motorhead748
    Member

    fear begins with FE.
     
  16. mammyjammer
    Joined: May 23, 2009
    Posts: 570

    mammyjammer
    Member
    from Area 51

    As does FEROCIOUS
     
  17. Zookeeper
    Joined: Aug 30, 2006
    Posts: 1,043

    Zookeeper
    Member

    Personally I'm a small block Ford/ T5 fan. They can make a ton of power, they fit most anything, parts are super plentiful, they look nice and they last and last even under abuse. FE's are neat and all, but dollar for dollar you can build a killer 302-based engine that looks right and runs hard far easier than an FE-based motor.
     
  18. chronisterracing
    Joined: Feb 27, 2010
    Posts: 139

    chronisterracing
    Member
    from N.Il.

    thanks Hotrod, I didn't know all you had to do was switch the shaft. I'm gonna look into that.
     
  19. outlaw256
    Joined: Jun 26, 2008
    Posts: 2,022

    outlaw256
    Member

    fe all the way baby!!!
     
  20. While I do like and FE and wouldn't give a second thought to the price of a ****** if I had a good runner, I am real partial the the 351 Clevland.

    I have owned a couple of hot ones and built several even a clevland headed 302 once for a fella who just had to have one. They can be made to run real stout without much work.


    yea yea I know everyone thought that I am Mr SBC. :rolleyes:
     
  21. Kenneth S
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,526

    Kenneth S
    Member

  22. 57Custom300
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,425

    57Custom300
    Member
    from Arizona

    Since you didnt mention yblocks I'd go with the FE.

    Only problem is FE stands ****in' Expensive, like HD stands for Hundred Dollars, or BOAT stands for Break Out Another Thousand etc...
     
  23. Kenneth S
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,526

    Kenneth S
    Member



    They had 2 different mainshafts also, one with 28 splines, and one with 31 splines. David Kee has those also.
     
  24. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    The small-block toploaders have a slightly longer input shaft than the FE ones, some folks have shortened the shaft, but I prefer to just make a simple spacer plate to go between the trans and bell, and not modify the trans- IIRC, it took around 1/8"- but would have to check. There are small-shaft and big-shaft big-block ******s, a 390 would get a small, 427's, CJ's and such got the big one. And before the Chebbrainwashed start in, a "small" Ford input is basically the size of a HD GM shaft LOL. The "big" shaft just uses the input size of a Ford medium truck
    A Mustang/ Cougar/ Fairlane/ Comet 390 trans would plug right in, the more plentiful and cheaper small-block trans works with a little work
    Another sweet alternative is the later 3spd w/OD toploaders from the 80's, if you want to row it and get the OD. Same size and similar appearance, and usually go pretty cheap
     
  25. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    I think you are talking about the T170F, commonly called the SMOD which was made for 78-84 F-150's and a lighter duty version for cars in 77-78 with smaller bearings. They were kind of a weird deal in that 4th gear was actually where 3rd gear would normally be and the flipped the shifter mechanism to make it work. It was replaced by the SROD (single Rail Overdrive) in Mustangs and such from 79-84 when the T-5 came out
    And then there was the T170FT, commonly called TOD (Topload OverDrive). These were mainly a truck trans

    None of these will handle a ton of power and the gear spacing is not ideal. I have blown up two SROD's, one in an 84 Mustang GT and the other in my Falcon
     
  26. 40FordGuy
    Joined: Mar 24, 2008
    Posts: 2,907

    40FordGuy
    Member

    I'm with the FE school.......Had a 67 Galaxie with one, and it held it's own very nicely.

    4TTRUK
     
  27. Kenneth S
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,526

    Kenneth S
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.