Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs How low did you go?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1stGrumpy, Feb 1, 2013.

  1. I would like to hear from you guys that are using the original enclosed driveline in your early Chevy's. How did you lower the rear and how much?
    I had a '54 Chevy ( back in '64) that I made 6" blocks for, it looked great but I couldn't keep u-joints in it. I have heard 3" max but would like a little more but without any u-joint problems.
    I want to get the rear of my '41 Sedan down and still maintain the original suspension and drive train.
    Would like to see pictures if you got any... Thanks :cool:
     
  2. Rocky
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 17,626

    Rocky
    Classified Editor

    My 52 had 3 inch blocks.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. 54LedSled
    Joined: Mar 11, 2011
    Posts: 362

    54LedSled
    Member

    3 inchs is going to be about it..others have pushed more but you run into scrub line issues..shaved bump stops and potential for the pumpkin to hit. I'm going to put 2" blocks on mine...
     
  4. edisonfire
    Joined: Jul 27, 2012
    Posts: 71

    edisonfire
    Member

    My '50 had 3" blocks on the rear in this picture

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2013
  5. Rocky & edisonfire ... I like the stance, is the front lowered also? How much? Thanks

    63Volksrod... Thank you
     
  6. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,722

    Rickybop
    Member

    Aside from the axle-to-frame-and-floor clearance issues, I wonder if lowering the front of the engine and/or raising the trans tailshaft 1/8"-1/4" or so for a slight change in angle would help to re-align the u-joints when going low with the stock drivetrain. The axle would tip back into phase since it pivots.
     
  7. I have heard of people raising the transmission but not sure of the results.
     
  8. edisonfire
    Joined: Jul 27, 2012
    Posts: 71

    edisonfire
    Member

    The front just had 1.5 coils cut off the stock springs, it looked good but rode like total ****. but its about 3.5-4 inches lower in the front.

    here is a picture of it before it was lowered, sorry the quality is bad.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Rocky
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 17,626

    Rocky
    Classified Editor

    Not mine....was planning to dump the front but my 216 block cracked before I could get to it and I swapped the car off for a 56 Pontiac hardtop..
     
  10. waldo53
    Joined: Jan 26, 2010
    Posts: 863

    waldo53
    Member
    from ID

    5" in back, (3" blocks stacked on 2" blocks) but even more in front. By 1958 when I took this picture, the tail-dragger look was old hat and a front rake was "in" (at least in CA). I drove it like this for 3 years and thousands of miles with no problems whatsoever. When I had a load of kids in it, it really sat LOW.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Thanks guys...
     
  12. lawman
    Joined: Sep 19, 2006
    Posts: 2,665

    lawman
    Member

    Try changing your pinion angle.Measure the angle on the rear of the transmission and the angle on the rear end. I changed mine on my 57 to 3 degrees up on the rear by re-welding the spring pad's. I have 4" block's in the back and 2 1/2" lowering springs in the front with homemade clamp's. Come's to about 3" down in the front.The angle change on the rear save's the U joint's. At least in my case it did.Hope this help's and check out my picture's on my profile as they show how the car look's.
     
  13. lawman
    Joined: Sep 19, 2006
    Posts: 2,665

    lawman
    Member

    Sorry fellow's but I missed "enclosed" !!!! Just being a tired old man !!! LOL
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.