Register now to get rid of these ads!

327 Build?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Harrison, Mar 21, 2013.

  1. Harrison
    Joined: Jan 25, 2002
    Posts: 7,133

    Harrison
    Member

    I bought a 1966 327 some time back. It was rebuilt years ago and installed in a 1970 Chevy camper. (A big one with a dually rear end under it - not just a camper shell on a pick up.) It was never driven much before it was parked and later parted out.

    Anyway, it is complete from top to bottom and has a 2bbl intake and carb. It has Power Pack heads on it. I'm hoping someone stuffed an RV cam in it when it was rebuilt. It is not locked up but I've not tried to start it yet.

    I'll swap to a 4bbl intake and carburetor and an RV cam if it doesn't have one already. Can I get the cam specs off the front or rear of the cam? Also, I'm wanting to use this engine in a daily driver. Should I stick with the Power Pack heads or swap to something else?

    Thanks, Jim
     
  2. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,304

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    1st Q what do you perceive as power-pack,
    please tell us what you see or (picture ).:cool:
     
  3. black 62
    Joined: Jul 12, 2012
    Posts: 1,895

    black 62
    Member
    from arkansas

    what will it be used for ?
     
  4. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,641

    oldolds
    Member

    What Henryj is asking, do the heads have the camel humps ( fuelie) or the diamond, pyramid (power pack). or no cast marks on the front of heads? casting numbers would help. Either way, street driven less than 6000 rpm. no problem with whatever you have.
     
  5. Jim it has rthe heads with the diamond in them right? I think they were officially called turbo fire heads on a 327 but most country boys still called the power pac heads. I would stick with those heads if that is what it has they were good heads.

    Sometimes you can get the cam specs off of the front of the cam but some manufacturers put them on the rear where there is more room. A generic cam even if it was sold as an RV cam may have nothing at all on it. If an RV cam is what you want lunatti makes a real nice one.
     
  6. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,304

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    ah you gave it away ...lol:cool:
     
  7. Harrison
    Joined: Jan 25, 2002
    Posts: 7,133

    Harrison
    Member

    They have this marking:

    [​IMG]

    (Wish they were Camel Hump.... :eek:)

    It'll just be street driven. Want it to sound good. Run good. Get decent mileage. I've heard of people using a 305 head before and wondered if that might be an option/worth the trouble.

    Thank guys, Jim
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2013
  8. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,304

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA


    that el work/ be just fine as 6000 probably the RPM limit:cool:
     
  9. the specs may not be on the cam , but there may be a part number you could look up and get them

    what is the casting number of the heads?
     
  10. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,259

    1934coupe
    Member

    There is no benefit to using 305 heads on a 4" bore like the 327 that you have. The 305 heads are better suited to the 283 bore engines. The heads you have will be excellent on that motor. I had a 70 chevy suburban 3/4T with a 327 those same heads and a Schnider (sp) RV came it had plenty of power and got 17 mpg. It made several trips cross country and had over 100K before it was rebuilt again.

    In my opinon you have a great motor there.

    Pat
     
  11. Harrison
    Joined: Jan 25, 2002
    Posts: 7,133

    Harrison
    Member

    Thanks guys!

    Guess I just need a good intake and carb and I'm set!

    Jim
     
  12. bgaro
    Joined: Sep 3, 2010
    Posts: 1,189

    bgaro
    Member

    agreed, those heads will be good. still has pretty good size valves if i'm not mistaken.
     
  13. brian303k
    Joined: Jun 1, 2012
    Posts: 4

    brian303k
    Member

    Would original powerpack heads or 305 heads give a 283 more power? I have a 66 C10 with a 283 and it has powerpack heads original to the motor. I wanna have some muscle behind the truck but keep decent mileage as it is my first car and will be my daily driver.
     
  14. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    Depends on which 305 heads; use the 601 casting number heads, and go with 1.84 intake valves (some come with those), and have them gone through, including having them surfaced. They have 53cc chambers (even smaller with milling), for a slight bump in CR, and have hardened seats. Performer intake with a Quadrajet carb, mild cam, HEI distributor, and free up the exhaust. It's how I would do it, but my 283 will be getting the 56' 265, 5603 casting number heads, as I already have them ready to go. The biggest drawback to those heads is the tiny ports/valves, even though the intakes have been changed to 1.84's. We'll see how things work out; I do have a ready-to-go set of 267/305 heads I came upon after having the 56' heads done. The low performance 327's, with Power Pack heads have a lot of potential; just don't over cam/over carb them, which is what usually happens. Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
  15. slammed
    Joined: Jun 10, 2004
    Posts: 8,150

    slammed
    Member

    1st up do a proper introduction in the proper location. Is this 283 fine, ready to go? Leave it. Otherwise if a full rebuild is in the cards, you may use the 305 for a bit of improvement. And modern accessories if that is the intent.
     
  16. brian303k
    Joined: Jun 1, 2012
    Posts: 4

    brian303k
    Member

    It is a good motor for now, it runs great but within a few years I plan on rebuilding it. A lot of things are rigged up improperly. The guy I bought it off of threw a 1973 q-jet for an automatic ****** so I have no vacuum line for the choke. Once it is warmed up the motor runs perfect. Just wanted to know which heads would bring more power for later on when I start pulling it apart.
     
  17. Harrison
    Joined: Jan 25, 2002
    Posts: 7,133

    Harrison
    Member

    Got my "327" home yesterday. Ran the numbers and found out that its a 283. I was going to put it in my coupe but I guess it'll go in my El Camino now.

    I pulled a valve cover and the intake manifold. Its clean as can be inside.

    Guess I'll find a 4bbl intake and run it as/is.
     
  18. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,778

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Nothing wrong with a 283 they are great little engines. HRP
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.