Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 9" Ford rearend width?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by nuthead, Jun 8, 2013.

  1. nuthead
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 129

    nuthead
    Member
    from Alpine,CA

    Ok I'm going around & round on what to do. This is going on my 30 Model A sedan on duece rails. I have a 9" housing that is 60"s flange to flange,which is too wide. Rearend is almost 3 inches wider on one side, so Im thinking I can cut & reweld one side, then buy just one new axle shaft. I'm getting ready to cut it down but can't decide on width. I will be running 40 ford wheels with 7.50 tires. Any help or suggestions? Thanks for help Chad
     

    Attached Files:

  2. woodiewagon46
    Joined: Mar 14, 2013
    Posts: 2,530

    woodiewagon46
    Member
    from New York

    Nuthead, I have a 9" small bearing housing 54 and1/2" flange to flange with axles. If you want it all you have to do is pay shipping and boxing and their yours. woodiewagon46@gmail.com
     
  3. The width you want would be determined by the wheels & tires you will be running. Set them exactly where you want and measure the inside wheel mounting surfaces, boom no compromise, no guessing no deciding it is what is.

    The other option is to get as close as you can with an existing housing and then make it work. Maybe you'll need spacers, little wheel tubs, weird offsets, redrilled axles , shaved drums- who knows exactly till you get something under it.
     
  4. scruffyv
    Joined: May 2, 2011
    Posts: 1

    scruffyv
    Member
    from webster ny

    hey woodie,if he isn't interested in I would be.
     
  5. Larry W
    Joined: Oct 12, 2009
    Posts: 742

    Larry W
    Member
    from kansas

    31 vicky has it nailed.
     
  6. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,525

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    For clarification and standard nomenclature sake, flange to flange would indicate the flanges at the ends of the tubes, where the backing plates bolt on, which is obviously not what you mean. WMS-to-WMS, or wheel mounting surface, to wheel mounting surface is what you mean.

    This is the only axle width measurement that actually matters, as brake offsets varied, on almost all axles, over the years. Flange-to-flange, and backing plate-to-backing plate measurements are all but useless.

    Yes, you can cut off the housing flange, cut down the tube, weld on a new one, they are easily commercially available, and run a shorter axle. This, of course, MUST be done in a jig, and carefully. Done without the proper jig, you will likely have a short-lived axle.
     
  7. nuthead
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 129

    nuthead
    Member
    from Alpine,CA

    Thanks for info guys. I found a guy with a jig to cut & reweld. So what is normal WMS to WMS that you guys are using with duece frame model A body? As soon as I get into shop Im going to do what 31vicky suggested.
     
  8. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,525

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I typically use a 58" axle on a fenderless A, but it depends on how low it is intended to sit at ride height. If the tires are to fit the profile of the inner fenders, a 58" axle seems to work well. If the car is low enough that the tires are past the top of the inner fenders, then a wider axle is called for.

    As has been said, roll your tires and wheels out, and put them where YOU want them, on both sides, and then measure that distance wms-to-wms. It matters little the exact number, if it does not look good to you.
     
  9. Gerry Moe
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 498

    Gerry Moe
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.