Register now to get rid of these ads!

Cooling thread disappeared ??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Don's Hot Rods, Jul 17, 2013.

  1. Don's Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 8,319

    Don's Hot Rods
    Member
    from florida

    Why did that new thread on engine cooling disappear ? I thought the article was very informative and I learned a few things . Did it violate something ? :confused: It certainly was about cars and cooling.

    Don
     
  2. badshifter
    Joined: Apr 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,630

    badshifter
    Member

    I think it had spam in it, like he cut and pasted the ads and all.
     
  3. Don's Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 8,319

    Don's Hot Rods
    Member
    from florida

    Oh. Too bad, the article itself was pretty good.

    Don
     
  4. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,812

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  5. They didn't have good cooling back in the day, therefore it is off topic
     
  6. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,812

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    HUH?:confused: HRP
     
  7. Don's Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 8,319

    Don's Hot Rods
    Member
    from florida

    No, one was posted for only a short while this morning and after I read it and went to post it was gone. It discussed how a cooling system really functions and was written by someone in the business for 30 years.

    The one thing it pointed out was that it is a myth that removing a thermostat altogether makes an engine run hotter. I agree with that point. I am running no thermostat in my 27 because I am running a bored out stroker with a chopped radiator, and when I removed it the temp went down 10-20 degees and stays there now.

    I hope he reposts the article without the offending ads.

    Don
     
  8. badshifter
    Joined: Apr 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,630

    badshifter
    Member

  9. VoodooTwin
    Joined: Jul 13, 2011
    Posts: 3,453

    VoodooTwin
    Member
    from Noo Yawk

    I agree as well. For a properly set up cooling system, increasing the water velocity cannot possibly cause the engine to run hotter. Here's the formula for basic heat transfer using a 50/50 mix of water/glycol as the heat transfer media: BTU/hr (this is the rate of heat from the engine transfered to the coolant) = gpm (coolant flow rate, gallons per minute) x 400 (conversion factor) x temperature difference in degrees F (water temperature leaving the engine minus the water temperature entering the engine). Radiators are designed for a specific BTU and temperature difference, so they behave according to the same formula.

    By increasing the flow rate, you can see that the temperature difference decreases. This is basic thermodynamics and the physics of "energy in equals energy out minus the energy stored". "Energy stored" equals zero for a properly set up cooling system. When "energy stored" becomes greater than zero, the engine goes boom.
     
  10. '51 Norm
    Joined: Dec 6, 2010
    Posts: 875

    '51 Norm
    Member
    from colorado

    I agree that increasing the coolant flow will not cause an engine to overheat.

    That said; in some situations when the thermostat is removed the increased flow can reduce the pressure in the eye of the pump impeller to the point that the pump begins to cavitate. When that happens the coolant flow drops to near zero. And as we all know lack of coolant flow is a bad thing.

    This happens most with stock water pumps running at high speed.

    I had a Pontiac that the internal baffle plate in the water pump had rusted through. This caused the engine to over heat at a specific RPM. I believe that the missing baffle plate was causing a cavation issue.

    It was interesting to watch because dropping below that point the temperature dropped instantly; above it was like no cooling at all. Fixing the pump cured the whole problem.
     
  11. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    "It’s amazing sometimes to talk to an individual who thinks factory engineers don’t know much.Thing to recognize is that factory engineers know a helluva lot more than we do and get into sophisticated areas that the great majority of us know nothing about.What I’m talking about is the stubbornness and unwillingness to learn from those who’ve been down the road before us.
    Keep in mind too, factory engineers are constrained by the bean counters, and the necessity to build a vehicle that is useful to the majority ... "


    quoted from our very knowledgable late friend ... C9
     
  12. VoodooTwin
    Joined: Jul 13, 2011
    Posts: 3,453

    VoodooTwin
    Member
    from Noo Yawk

    Increased flow will not cause a pump to cavitate. The Net Positive Suction Head available (get your minds out of the gutter, this engineering speak)....or positive pressure at the pump's impellar inlet will INCREASE when the thermostat (a flow restriction) is removed. Cavitation is primarily caused when there is LOW pressure at the inlet, usually due to too much of a flow restriction. But this issue usually does not come into play in a closed system. Open hydraulic systems are more prone to cavitation issues.
     
  13. OfficerBimbo
    Joined: Mar 22, 2012
    Posts: 89

    OfficerBimbo
    Member

    A side note: My truck with a 350 sbc was running hot. I pulled the fail open style thermostat out and found that it had failed open on one side with the other side wedged shut (the prongs had contracted on one side and not the other). I put a regular Stant thermostat back in and it is running fine now.
     
  14. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,413

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Perhaps a copyright issue? Gary
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.