Register now to get rid of these ads!

What rearend in a 53 Ford?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ss34coupe, Aug 24, 2013.

  1. ss34coupe
    Joined: May 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,266

    ss34coupe
    Member

    I am finally getting back on my 53 Ford convertible project. It has Jamco rear springs with a 57 Ford nine inch rear in it now. The mounting pads on the rearend are out a bit too far, and will have to be relocated for this unit to work.
    Anybody found a rearend later than 1956 that will bolt in a 53 Ford without any modifications? Does not have to be a Ford unit - if I find something that bolts in and can handle the 302 Ford motor, I will use the 57 nine inch on something else.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    If the rear end is the correct width drum face to drum face just move the ****** mounting pads over. No big whoop!
     
  3. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 18,555

    Squablow
    Member

    I have a 9" in my '53 and that's what we did. Changing a tire is tight when you lower these but that's true of any rearend.

    My '52 has a Maverick 8" rear in it and doesn't look to have been modified but it was in there when I got it so I can't say they didn't move the pads for that one too. Explorer 8.8" is also supposed to fit but again, pads gotta move either way.
     
  4. A stock '56 Ford rear could handle a 312 Y-block, why couldn't it handle a 302?
     
  5. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    Most leaf-spring Fords have spring-to-spring spacing that is pretty constant (about 43 inches if I haven't forgotten.....). '57-59 Ford rears are probably a pretty good start, as are Mustang and Maverick eight-inch rears. Later model Ranger pickups or the SUV derivatives of that ch***is have 8.8 rears that should work; many of them have the bonus of disc brakes.
     
  6. ss34coupe
    Joined: May 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,266

    ss34coupe
    Member

    I know I could move the spring pads, but just wanted to see if anyone had found a more modern rear that was a direct bolt it. With all the modified 1952 to 54 Fords around here, somebody must have the answer.
     
  7. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Heck, the factory rear will stand up to a 302 for a long long time unless you abuse it.
     
  8. supervert
    Joined: Mar 8, 2009
    Posts: 433

    supervert
    Member

    We put a sploder 8.8 in my brothers. His should have 350 hp or so and I know he will abuse it. No point in having power if you have to *****foot it. If you are running stock wheels, the hub bore on the sploder is larger than the 53.
     
  9. ss34coupe
    Joined: May 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,266

    ss34coupe
    Member

    Thanks for the info, guys!
     
  10. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 18,555

    Squablow
    Member

    Also true of the Maverick rear in mine. Had to hone out a bit of meat from the wheel centers with a barrel sander to get clearance.
     
  11. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,925

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a 8" Ford Mustang from a 1966 under the wagon and don't remember moving the spring pads. HRP

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  12. 61falcon
    Joined: Jan 1, 2009
    Posts: 772

    61falcon
    Member

    i have heard that maverick 8inch is a direct bolt in swap but they are getting hard to find.
     
  13. jhtdon
    Joined: May 29, 2012
    Posts: 112

    jhtdon
    Member
    from Florida

    My 52 Ford Sedan Delivery has a Maverick Rear Driven by a 392 Windsor SBF.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. 40FordGuy
    Joined: Mar 24, 2008
    Posts: 2,907

    40FordGuy
    Member

    Move the pads !

    4TTRUK
     
  15. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,560

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The early 9" brake parts are getting harder to find. Look for another set of wear items first. If you can't find your next set, then I'd consider another axle, or at least a newer 9".
     
  16. ss34coupe
    Joined: May 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,266

    ss34coupe
    Member

     
  17. ss34coupe
    Joined: May 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,266

    ss34coupe
    Member

    Very nice car!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.