Register now to get rid of these ads!

Flathead - Edelbrock Heads - Does it make sense to use the High Lift Model?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by chinarus, Sep 21, 2013.

  1. chinarus
    Joined: Nov 9, 2010
    Posts: 536

    chinarus
    Member
    from Georgia

    Edelbrock offers what they refer to as HighLift/Large Chamber head versus the older conventional design.

    I found this post from 2010 with lots of CR and head gasket calculations that leads me to believe the newer models with the larger combustion chamber might be easier to dial in the CR for today's gas:

    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=482189


    Info from the Edelbrock web site:

    Ford Flathead
    The original Edelbrock script logo design for Fords and Mercurys
    Rugged, ribbed internally and externally, with a large water capacity and excellent breathing characteristics
    Cast at the Edelbrock Foundry in the USA of T-6 tempered A356 aluminum
    65cc heads support 8.0:1 compression ratio on blocks with a 3/16" base relief (stock bore and stroke), compression ratio increase is approximately 3/10 of a percent with each 1/8" stroke
    High Lift/Large Chamber versions feature a new "raised roof" combustion chamber design that is CNC machined for high lift cams and is perfect for reducing compression in supercharger applications or on low octane fuel
    High Lift heads have increased valve clearance and increased flow capacity

    Description Pair of Heads
    1949-53 Ford-Mercury 24-stud (65cc) 1115
    1938-48 Ford-Mercury 24-stud (65cc) 1125
    High Lift/Large Chamber 1949-53 Ford-Mercury 24-stud (74cc) 1116
    High Lift/Large Chamber 1938-48 Ford-Mercury 24-stud (74cc) 1127

    For a fresh mild performance rebuild with a stock or mild cam, is it recommended to buy the newer model heads because of the e****gas (Ethanol) we have to put up with these days?
    Looks like there is quite a bit of difference in the combustion chamber size(74 versus 65).

    Don't want to buy one set only to find out I should have bought the other.
    Yes, I know CR is also dependent on bore, piston type, deck height, etc etc etc.

    thanks
     
  2. chinarus
    Joined: Nov 9, 2010
    Posts: 536

    chinarus
    Member
    from Georgia

  3. What are you building the engine for? Street cruiser ? Street/ strip?

    I run the 1116 heads with a blown 289 ci combo so in my case I needed the CR drop and the valve clearance with a custom cam. The heads will lower your CR and provide extra valve to head clearance, but what is your application?

    Rat
     
  4. George/Maine
    Joined: Jan 6, 2011
    Posts: 949

    George/Maine
    Member

    Looks are more important then knowledge.
     
  5. chinarus
    Joined: Nov 9, 2010
    Posts: 536

    chinarus
    Member
    from Georgia

    Just a street cruiser with a little more power with a facelift.
    A 1946 59A is the core and the target build includes
    aluminum heads, dual 97s, headers, etc.

    Got a chance to pick up a set of 1125 heads real cheap and don't have a lot of time to build one on paper just to figure out A is better than B or vice versus and I thought there would be a wealth of knowledge on this forum.

    I found some info in this book but it appears to be a bit dated:

    How to Build Ford Flathead V-8 Horsepower
    By George McNichol

    As a bit of knowledge sharing, "than" is spelled with an "a" and used for comparisons:
    http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/difficulties/thanthen.html
     
  6. CNC-Dude
    Joined: Nov 23, 2007
    Posts: 1,045

    CNC-Dude
    Member

    Its a tough call on whether to buy the used heads or the new ones. Check the used ones out thoroughly and make sure they aren't a mismatched set, which is a common thing for an item such as this that could be close to 60 years old. Also check them out for water p***age corrosion(very common), stripped bolt threads and cracks and just overall condition. Also ask yourself, why are they "real" cheap.
     
  7. dan c
    Joined: Jan 30, 2012
    Posts: 2,653

    dan c
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    one thing to think about is the gas back in the early '50s was only 80 octane--or somewhere in that neighborhood. at my local station, the e10 is 87,89 or 93. my big problem with "new" gas is its short shelf life and how it eats up the soft parts in your fuel system. i hear it's bad for automotive paint, too.
     
  8. Care to elaborate George?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.