Register now to get rid of these ads!

'53 truck rearend or trans swap?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by whitefire70, Nov 22, 2013.

  1. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    I just got this 1953 Chevy 3100 that's in pretty solid condition. My biggest concern is that it's such a dog at 45 mph. The motor feels like it's taching out at around 4000 at normal driving speeds. It's got the 325 with the (I'm ***uming) original 3 speed with L gear manual transmission. I want to be able to drive this truck on the freeway. Would changing the gears in the rear end fix this or should I swap out the ****** and add another gear or two?
     
  2. What's L gear?? Is it a four speed truck trans or a regular 3 speed? If it's the four speed, 45 is about it. 325? Do you mean 235?
    Add another gear or two?? How do you plan on doing that? Open the trans and just toss them in?.
    Your problem is the rear end gearing. It's probably too low for freeway driving. Swap it out for a higher set. If you do have the four speed, lose it also. They're big, heavy, noisy, clunky and generally unsuited for a daily driver
     
  3. simplestone
    Joined: Aug 18, 2010
    Posts: 953

    simplestone
    Member

    I agree - swapping the gears in the rear axle would be the quickest and easiest way to go. However, if thinking about another transmission, look into the t5. Pretty easy swap & lots of information here on how to go about that. Good luck!
     
  4. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    My apologies, I meant 235. It's a 4 speed, basically 3 speed with the granny gear (L). I was talking about swapping out the transmission that's in it with a 5 speed transmission (that would be adding another gear)
     
  5. henry29
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 2,887

    henry29
    Member

    How can you do that without swapping out the rearend?
     
  6. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    You can't. But it would be nice...(it wouldn't, really.)
     
  7. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    Hold on, I'm lost. are you saying that you can't swap out the transmission unless you change the gears in the rear diff also?
    Please keep in mind guys that I'm still green when it comes to modifying these old vehicles...
     
  8. 52HardTop
    Joined: Jun 21, 2007
    Posts: 1,114

    52HardTop
    Member

    You need to swap out the rear to an open drive line as well as changing the transmission.
     
  9. Barsteel
    Joined: Oct 15, 2008
    Posts: 733

    Barsteel
    Member
    from Monroe, CT

    That truck, with the original drive train, has a torque tube rear end with an enclosed drive shaft. You'll see a solid tube leading to the rear end with a pivot ball enclosure at the back of the ******. Yes, you can switch JUST the rear end gears (Patrick's makes a 3.55 set), but that will get you 60mph at best. That ****** ****s. Your best bet is to swap in a '55 - '57 Chevy rear end with 3.70 gears (4.11 will work as well), and a T-5. To do so, you will have to get new rear leaf springs/hangers/mounts, and relocate the perches on the rear end to match the width of the leaf springs. I believe Ch***is Engineering makes a kit. You'll also have to have a driveshaft fabricated to fit.

    If you get a T5, you will have to either use an S10 T-5 pre 1987 or earlier (for a mechanical speedo drive), or get a T5 out of a Camaro and bolt on an S10 T5 tail housing (kinda hard to find). With an S10 T5 you will need an adaptor plate, as the input shaft is about 5/8 to long. A Camaro T5 will bolt right in. You will also have to move the cross member, and get a shifter. The Camaro T5 from a V8 application has the most favorable gear ratios, V6 Camaros not so much, although they're still decent, the worst are 4cyl S10 T5s. The first gear is so low as to be almost unusable.

    If you can't find a '55 - '57 Chevy rear, many folks use an S10 rear (believe from a 4wd), or an early Camaro/Nova rear.

    This covers about 70% of what you have to do. There's the clutch issue to be sorted out, but that's not that big of a deal.

    I've done this switch twice, and have been VERY happy with the results. You can actually USE the truck on modern roads, and it's fun to drive. Worth the time, effort, and expense, IMHO.

    PM if you need more detail.

    Chris
     
  10. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    Thank you, that really helps.
     
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,524

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What Barsteel said. And yes, if an S10 rear, it MUST be a 4x4 unit. The 2wd ones are several inches narrower. Too narrow to be used in this application.
     
  12. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,009

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    One thing that the guys forgot to tell you is that the rear axles they suggested all have 5 on 4-3/4 bolt pattern so you would have 5 lug wheels with that setup on the rear. You could put 54 Car drums, hubs and backing plates on the front to match and have 5 lug all around but that adds to the work.

    The main thing is to get it set up so that it runs down the road at road speeds with a comfortable rpm for the engine.
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2013
  13. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    Has anyone tried using a 12 bolt rear from a mid to late 70s truck?
     
  14. 1955IHC
    Joined: Aug 20, 2013
    Posts: 636

    1955IHC
    Member

    It will be too wide.

    Sent via Illinois Bell Telephone Company's Car Radiotelephone
     
  15. readhead
    Joined: Dec 9, 2011
    Posts: 636

    readhead
    Member

    Use a 44 out of an old wagoneer. 6 lugs and right width. Several years ago I did this swap to make AD 4x4's and used early wagoneer for the whole drivetrain.


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  16. 50ChevyFrank
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 229

    50ChevyFrank
    Member

    Good luck with your AD 3100. I love those trucks. Lots of them have been modified with different rear ends, trans and engines. Use the search feature of this site as well as visiting http://stovebolt.com.
    Your truck originally had a 216, not a 235, and 4.11 rear gears. It may have a 235 now as lots of things can happen in 60 years.
    Oh, and once you get it to go faster, how are you going to steer it and stop it? You can easily overdrive the handling and braking ability of the original truck.
     
  17. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,524

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Waggy Dana 44. That would work well, of you can locate one.
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2013
  18. halfordrk
    Joined: Nov 23, 2013
    Posts: 3

    halfordrk
    Member
    from new york

    The first gear is so low as to be almost unusable.[​IMG]
     
  19. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    Frank, I've noticed that the 216 has already been swapped out with a 235 date coded 1960 (I believe). I'm budgeting for a power disk brake upgrade but was contemplating just rebuilding the steering. If I did that would she be safe on the freeway?
     
  20. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    What year wagoneer for the dana 44 should I look for?
     
  21. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,009

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not sure on the Dana 44 but you still have a bolt pattern problem. You have to remember that several of the suggestions were only for rear axles that were the correct width and had decent gear ratios readily available.

    I have put a 56 open drive pickup rear axle under a 53 pickup along with the 56 235 and three speed trans. You do have to use a pair of spring pads to put the axle on top of the springs rather than under it. The gear ratio issue is still there though but the truck I did it on carries a camper on it full time that was built for the truck.
     
  22. readhead
    Joined: Dec 9, 2011
    Posts: 636

    readhead
    Member

    It has been awhile. I think late 60's, early 70's. Ask some jeep guys. The last one I did was 18 years ago and as I recall we didn't use the jeep V-8 but we used the th400 that came in it.
     
  23. 1955IHC
    Joined: Aug 20, 2013
    Posts: 636

    1955IHC
    Member

    Wagoneer will have the correct bolt pattern.

    Sent via Illinois Bell Telephone Company's Car Radiotelephone
     
  24. whitefire70
    Joined: Sep 27, 2013
    Posts: 10

    whitefire70
    Member

    I'm budgeting for a power disk brake upgrade but was contemplating just rebuilding the suspension and steering. If I did that would she be safe on the freeway?
     
  25. simplestone
    Joined: Aug 18, 2010
    Posts: 953

    simplestone
    Member

  26. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,744

    bobss396
    Member

    Did the '53 still have a torque tube even with the 4-speed?

    I helped covert a '54 rear axle over to something newer many years back. We used a rear out of a later ('68-70) Chevy pickup or panel truck. The width was perfect. I made new mounting perches out of square tubing and a little milling work. The transmission was replaced by a 3-speed that came out of the same donor truck.

    Measure up your existing rear, axle flange to axle flange and go out picking. I would join an old truck forum, those guys have done it all.

    Bob
     
  27. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,009

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    the 3100's did Bob. I'm thinking up through 67 is still the narrow rear axle and GMC trucks had leaf springs on the rear rather than the coil springs that most all Chevy trucks had from 60 though 72. I think the Truck rears got wider in 69.
     
  28. 6inarow
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 2,475

    6inarow
    Member

    Depends on what you want to wind up with. You can put a Saginaw 4 speed in place of the original transmission and you can put 3,55 gears in the original torque tube. It gets you to 65 Mph pretty easy
     
  29. ^^^^^How are you going to hook the Sag to the torque tube?
     
  30. henry29
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 2,887

    henry29
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.