Register now to get rid of these ads!

steering box with an upward pitman arm on 32 frame?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by john walker, Feb 16, 2013.

  1. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    instead of the arm hanging down and having the drag link on an angle, has anyone ever used a box that the pitman arm goes upward and turns to the rear when steering to the right? model a on a 32 frame, no fenders, dropped axle, split 36 bones.
     
  2. Vendome
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 130

    Vendome
    Member

    Early Volkswagen microbus. Depends on your application but you want to keep your drag link parallel to the ground and the radius rods if possible.
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  3. metal man
    Joined: Dec 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,955

    metal man
    Member

    I've seen it quite a few times, but it is a recipe for bumpsteer. That puts the pitman arm end of the drag link way too high.
     
  4. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    six of one, half dozen of the other, eh?

    i was thinking that with a 4" dropped axle and adjusting the height of the hairpin steering arm, it might be feasible. highboy style model a.
     
  5. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    i heard the vw bus one might work. just a matter of prying one out of the vw parts hoarders.
     
  6. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    Early mustang box used to be the hot ticket, usually mounted to a bracket below the frame so the arm wasn't waiving around beside the hood... I have also used 37-48 ford steering box mounted on its side.
     
  7. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,275

    Rob Paul
    Member

    37-48 Ford box mounted on its side thru an unboxed frame. The two mounting holes bolted thru the top frame rail. With a flat crossmember, RE spring and 4" drop axle the draglink will be pretty close to parallel with the ground.
     
  8. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    anyone in the seattle area want to part with a 37-48 box and arm?
     
  9. timwhit
    Joined: Jan 30, 2012
    Posts: 5,185

    timwhit
    Member

    Early mustang for sure...used one on a '34 sedan, worked great! tim
     
  10. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    i googled a picture of a mustang box. looks kind of big and long, like it would be mounted below the frame. i need something through the frame, normal style.
     
  11. hotrodarchaeologist
    Joined: Dec 4, 2007
    Posts: 657

    hotrodarchaeologist
    Member
    from Maine

    My previous Model A on original '32 frame with pitman arm pointing up...no bump steer problems...1962 Willys Jeep 4x4 wagon Ross steering box...

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  12. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    local hamber Moses has one.
     
  13. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    i also have one of those, not sure i want to part with it though...
     
  14. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    Allegedly
    You can install the guts from a 35 or 36 box in a 32 box … basically reveres it / arm pointing up
     
  15. We went up on this one (warning, O/T I guess...).
    [​IMG]
    It's a Samurai box I turned down in a lathe to fit through a sleeve in the frame. Not your application, I know, but the box worked out great...
     
  16. tiredford
    Joined: Apr 6, 2009
    Posts: 559

    tiredford
    Member
    from Mo.

    _____________________________________________
    It amazes me how steering angles and pinion angles can have so many people confused. There are some great threads on here that do***ent how they should be and some people still don't get it. Just saying...
     
  17. metal man
    Joined: Dec 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,955

    metal man
    Member

    I know. I have explained it several times and I know others have too, but I continue to see guys changing things and making them worse. The best example is the common myth that the drag link should be parallel to the wishbone or radius rod. That is absolutely wrong, but fortunately, most of our early iron doesn't have a whole lot of suspension travel, so it's not such a big deal I guess.
     
  18. curbspeed
    Joined: Feb 7, 2002
    Posts: 4,907

    curbspeed
    Member

    My buddy Rory put a 40 box in his 34 roadster with the Pitman arm pointing up. He says it works great. He's on here and may chime in if he sees this thread. He's got the most *****in' 34 roadster I've seen. Nailed it!
     

    Attached Files:

    • 65.jpg
      65.jpg
      File size:
      172.2 KB
      Views:
      337
  19. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    You are right. Really the only time when a pitman arm pointing up is geometrically correct is when it's used with a four bar kinda deal and all are moving on complimentary arcs. But as you said most of our suspensions travel in such small arcs that I guess that's how people are getting away with it. I remember a deuce tudor I drove years ago that had a Mustang box and longish split wishbones that humped all over the road. It wasn't too low, and I guess there was enough drag link and wishbone length, plus enough suspension travel to magnify the mess.

    For me it's easy. Geometrically correct wins everytime.
     
  20. The 35-36 guts fit in the 32 box. Bearings and bushings are all the same from 32-36. I'm not that computer smart, or I'd show some pictures of my coupe. The way everything ended up, the drag link and split bones were parrallel. I mocked it up with an empty box, then decided on what parts to get. If you can find the parts, it's another way to go. Depends on what you're after. As for what Metal man said, I don't know if the parrallel items were the reason, or a happy accident. I cycled the axle through it's travel, and the arc angles seem to compliment each other well. More than likely it has to do with the limited travel.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2013
  21. ukgav
    Joined: Jun 16, 2008
    Posts: 361

    ukgav
    Member

    My truck runs what I'm told is a 40 Mercury box mounted on a bracket below the frame. Works good.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    It's my understanding that if you draw an imaginary line along and past the drag link it should intersect, or pretty near, with the rear mount of the wishbone?
    [​IMG]
     
  22. metal man
    Joined: Dec 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,955

    metal man
    Member

    ^^^you're correct. Yours looks really close to that,even though the pitman arm is up, because you have the box mounted so low.

    I'm guessing the Mercury box is the same as the Ford of the same year? Can't tell from the picture.

    Nice setup.
     
  23. john walker
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 1,139

    john walker
    Member

    i just found a '37 box and i have an F1 and F100 too, so when it gets mocked up, i have some choices in order to clear the wishbones and exhaust.
     
  24. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,004

    Mart
    Member

    Having the box below the rail and the arm sticking up, while not perfect, is a lot better than the box in the conventional location with the arm up. Having the business end of the pitman arm 3 or 4 inches lower helps a lot.

    Mart.
     
  25. willymakeit
    Joined: Apr 13, 2009
    Posts: 1,376

    willymakeit
    Member

    I would like to see more of these. I either have to go this route or cross steer on a project Im building.
     
  26. willymakeit
    Joined: Apr 13, 2009
    Posts: 1,376

    willymakeit
    Member

    This gives me a idea.
     
  27. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,685

    Marty Strode
    Member

    This one is a V/W bus box, and with the box mounted under the frame, they drive great! If You move the drag link to the top hole (which is used for dirt oval track), you will notice a slight amount of bump steer. I have built a dozen of these cars, some with 20,000 miles without a complaint.
     

    Attached Files:

  28. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Thanks for chiming in Marty. Easier to fit with the hemi heads and still keep the engine at a reasonable height, is that why you went that way? I am faced with some steering box fit issues on mine, with the desoto.
     
  29. RPM
    Joined: Feb 5, 2005
    Posts: 204

    RPM
    Member

  30. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,685

    Marty Strode
    Member

    George, most of the cars I built, ran flatheads, those V/W boxes mount real easy, they have a "pinch clamp" built into the mount, making the steering shaft angle adjustable after mounting. They also steer quick 2.75 turns, lock to lock. I have been using them for 40 plus years, this is the "Ross" version.
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.