Register now to get rid of these ads!

gear ratios , rmps & MPG

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mullskull, Jan 25, 2014.

  1. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    now my head is starting to spin, information overload!!
    seriously though, thanks again for the info...
     
  2. My experience is vacuum advance will add more than 1 mpg... unless you have a very heavy right foot. Probably closer to 3-4.

    And as has been said, changing just the rear axle ratio will just move the problem.
     
  3. SSKINNER
    Joined: Nov 22, 2013
    Posts: 12

    SSKINNER
    Member

    Without all the rocket science, your thinking is right on the money. With the camshaft that your running, anything below 2400 rpm its not going to be happy. With the combo you have either lower your OD ratio or your Diff ratio. 4.11 rear or .73 od sounds about right. Millage will improve and performance will be better through out the RPM range.

    Steve
     
  4. SSKINNER
    Joined: Nov 22, 2013
    Posts: 12

    SSKINNER
    Member

    P.S.
    I'd prefer to drop the rear to a 4.11 ratio. She would monster stop light to stop light and an angel in OD on the highway. Just my 2 cents. Sounds like a pretty good combo. Aint bench racing fun!!

    Steve
     
  5. I think if you go to a shorter tire, it would help. I run Michelin 7.50R16s on my 74 F350 ramp truck, and they are 32" tall. And I don`t agree about 4.10s with a T5 making first gear "useless" I don`t know what the 1rst gear ratio in a Camaro T5 is, but I ran a 3.35 low gear T5 in my Mustang with 4.88s, and for acceleration, it was great. Yeah, in normal street driving, you will likely be shifting into 2nd 1/2 way thru the intersection, so what? The off the line grunt is well worth it to me.
     
  6. ebfabman
    Joined: Mar 10, 2009
    Posts: 559

    ebfabman

    It really will depend on rear tire height but this scenario seems most desirable....
     

    Attached Files:

  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,459

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If this were Consumer Reports forum, yeah, I'd agree with you. But damn...how about building a traditional hot rod?
     
  8. But but but they are so archaic and out dated with obsolete old crap :p
     
  9. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,092

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Come on guys, inefficiency, and outright wasting fuel and money is traditional. Get with the program!
     
  10. Jay Tyrrell
    Joined: Dec 9, 2007
    Posts: 1,631

    Jay Tyrrell
    Member

    Hey I agree but times are a changing! Gas price, house expense, babies, college funds, retirement, lower income jobs. Don't get me going Jim.

    If I had kept the M20 4 speed in my car I would never had been able to drive the chevy to California from Toronto, Ontario Canada! I would never had been able to afford the gas man! I think that the 5 speed is the best of both worlds!
    1st-4th is a handful with my set-up. It sure is nice to be able to slip into fifth and cruise the hwy and not kill my bank account!

    Besides to look inside my car it would take a trained eye to see that it is a Tremec. I kept the 4 speed ball just for the naysayers! lololol
    Jay
     
  11. Jay Tyrrell
    Joined: Dec 9, 2007
    Posts: 1,631

    Jay Tyrrell
    Member

    Yup!
     
  12. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,092

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My Falcon has a 5-speed. My Model A has a 6-speed. Both can get 30MPG if driven conservatively, and the A has a V8.

    Putting a 4-speed, or even a 3-speed in either would not make either more fun to drive, just more expensive.

    Each is "dressed" above the floor, to appear no different from a period transmission.

    There is no gain in fewer gears, only loss.

    Oh, and the Falcon will be getting a 6-speed, fronted by a common-rail, direct-injected intercooled-turbo-diesel, as soon as I finish gathering hardware. Yeah, I will be no longer able to talk about it here, but performance will increase, and the MPG should be at or about 60MPG, at 65MPH.
     
  13. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    4 speed is traditional? In the 60's my Olds powered 32 had a Cad-Lasalle, no crappy 4 speed :) Of course premium was 36 cents (2.03 in todays dollars) Tradition means different things to different folks, I'd say a 324 trumps the 5 speed.
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,092

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yeah, the 4-speed is not traditional, either.
     
  15. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    my toyota is a 4 speed
     
  16. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    i check the RPM's with the GPS on my phone... 4th gear @2300 rpm is 60 mph-


    4th gear should show about 57 MPH @ 2300 RPM.
    Something is not reading correctly, or the rear ratio is wrong, as squirrel already mentioned. :)

    [/QUOTE]
     
  17. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    turning the engine 1 full rotation gets me around 1.25 on the driveshaft.
    10 rotations gets me 17.7 ish...


    tire height is 30.5

    how do i translate this info into what OD ratio i have??


     
  18. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    double checked rpm's with a gps.. pretty much the same-
    1 st- 3000 @ 26
    2nd-3000 @38
    3rd- 3000 @ 52
    4th- 3000@ 74
    5th-1800 @ 80

    the engine started to ping in 5th, so i backed off pretty quickly.. i realize this points to timing / tuneup situation.. i'll be dealing with all that in the next week or so. including installing a vacuum advance-



     
  19. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    i'm curious...what math did you do to figure that out??

    thanks man i really appreciate it!

     
  20. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    So it's a .59. with a 3.70 that's a 2.18 in 5th.

    Call it 15 inch loaded radius you are looking at 1709 RPM at 70 MPH.
    With a .72 OD gear you would be at 2085.
     
  21. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    never mind... i just figured that one out-
     
  22. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    thanks Hoop..

    looks like i'll be changing my overdrive..

     
  23. Division
    Got "A"s in math
    Honor roll and I also got expelled , go figure
     
  24. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    This is a model of your car, shifting at 5500. It slows down when you hit 5th.[​IMG]
    Blue = RPM, Red MPH, White = Accell G

    oh and

    [​IMG]
     
  25. wayne-o
    Joined: Jan 22, 2006
    Posts: 284

    wayne-o
    Member

    Hoop, mullskull,
    This is almost exactly where I ended up with my setup after changing from the .5 something to the .72 OD. Only difference is I have a 3:55 rear. 30-1/2" tire. Right at 2000 in 5th at 70. 2400 pound roadster with 327 and comp XE268 cam. I wish I could figure out how to post the excell spread sheet I used.
     
  26. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    Highlight the cells and "copy".

    Open MSPAint

    Paste, save as jpeg.

    Use advanced under post, manage attachments, browse to file and upload it.
     
  27. ebfabman
    Joined: Mar 10, 2009
    Posts: 559

    ebfabman

    Yep it looks like you got a .59 od. A .72 should be about perfect for 3.70 R&P with 30 inch ish tall tire. Now time your cams power range to your gearing and dial in your ignition and you'll be good to go.
     
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,092

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The good news is that T5 5th gear sets are a separate unit, and can be swapped for other ones, without ditching the whole trans.

    You will, of course, have to figure out which main to counter-shaft ratio you have, and then figure out what gearset you need from there. Alternately, post the transmission tag number, and I will see if I can get an answer for you. It is probably the Mustang 2.95 gear set.

    Numerous and various 5th gear sets are often on that auction site that shall not be named.
     
  29. mullskull
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 259

    mullskull
    Member

    Unfortunately I don't think that the trans has a id tag...
    I'm gunna call the guy who built the trans, hopefully he keeps good records-
    If not what's the alternative.. Take the trans apart to find out what gearset I'll need??


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.