Register now to get rid of these ads!

TH400 article

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Abomination, Dec 14, 2007.

  1. Locomotive Breath
    Joined: Feb 1, 2007
    Posts: 710

    Locomotive Breath
    Member
    from Texas

    Yes, it is a different case that was used behind the V12's
     
  2. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    No, it doesn't hurt it
     
  3. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,329

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    John Kilgore is still perfecting these transmissions. He worked with the GM engineers many, MANY years back. He also had input on the 4spd. version of the T-400.

    http://www.kilgoretrans.com/

    Mike
     
  4. tjet
    Joined: Mar 16, 2009
    Posts: 1,350

    tjet
    Member

  5. The Highway
    Joined: Feb 9, 2014
    Posts: 1

    The Highway
    Member

    This is all good stuff. I want to thank you.
     
  6. Abomination
    Joined: Oct 5, 2006
    Posts: 6,772

    Abomination
    Member

    No prob!

    I recently went back in and updated some of the picture links, where still available.

    ~Jason
     
  7. Mthewrench
    Joined: Nov 26, 2006
    Posts: 89

    Mthewrench
    Member
    from Colorado

    Not at 35 but coming off the highway at a good clip pulling down into 2nd for the grade retard removes the boss that holds the band in place. After that everything still works except grade retard in 2nd. Might have been brought up already but the th400 will shift from manual 1st into 2nd with out moving the shifter and shift point can be changed with a governor spring change. From a stop stick it in 1st leave it there mash the gas and check the tach when it shifts. Remember governor allows upshift. MW
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2014
  8. Abomination
    Joined: Oct 5, 2006
    Posts: 6,772

    Abomination
    Member

    Here's more info about what John does:
    http://www.kilgoretrans.com/html/how_transmission_works.html

    Super Chevy Magazine explains how the Superlite works:

    POWER TO WEIGHT
    A Strong Turbo 400 Doesn't Have To Weigh A Ton

    By Jason Walkner, August 2001 issue

    Super Chevy Magazine www.superchevy-web.com

    One of the most tried and true methods for building a faster race car is making an effort to eliminate excess weight from the body, ch***is, and any other significant parts that are sure to cause slower track times as well as added strain on the engine. As the old saying goes, there's no better way to improve performance than by improving the power-to-weight ratio.

    For this story, we want to address the problem of heavy internal transmission parts and how they slow the power distribution, which causes a notable loss in horsepower from the engine to the drive shaft. To explore this problem further, we contacted John Kilgore, who has been building race-proven transmissions for longer fro more than 30 years. Kilgore's philosophy on building a better TH400 - the tried and true workhorse of racing automatic gearboxes - starts out with simple laws of physics: the heavier an object is the more power it will take to move. The answer then seems pretty simple; why not lighten it up?

    To begin with, there is an incredible amount of inertia produced inside an automatic transmission. For example, shifting from First gear to Second gear, will mean instantly stopping the 14-pound direct drum, which is turning at 84 percent engine speed, while the 8-pound front reaction carrier starts turning at 50 percent engine speed. All of this happens in the short time it takes to shift gears. Additionally, there is an equal amount of force generated when shifting in and out of all three gears. Keep in mind, when General Motors designed the TH400, it was for an entirely different purpose than racing. The Turbo 400 had to handle the torque of a big-block powerhouse as well as deliver a comfortable and reliable drive. This is the reasoning behind having heavy internal parts.

    [​IMG]

    On the left is the lightweight Kilgore TH400 internals compared with those from a factory unit. What you can't see is the 30-plus pounds removed from the OEM TH400 parts.

    What Kilgore has done to whittle away at this problem is use lighter parts to make a better transfer of power. The components used inside one of Kilgore's TH400s, adds up to losing an amazing 30 pounds of reciprocating m***! This may not seem overly significant, until we consider most of that 30 pounds is stopping and starting instantly at a very high rpm, under extreme stress, no less.

    In addition to the weight savings, the use of smaller hollow hubs, in lieu of the oversize and "weighty" factory TH400 drums, allows more space so that twice as many friction disks (or clutch disks) can be employed. Since friction disks are what stop the drums, it goes without saying that more is better. The added space also leaves room for thicker steel friction disks, which get sandwiched between the clutch disks and add much more cooling surface than their thinner counterparts.

    Not only is Kilgore's TH400 lighter, but when used with the correct gear rations, it becomes a bullet-proof automatic to launch any high-torque, big- or small-block racer down the quarter mile easily an reliably. So follow along as we go about putting a basic TH400 on a weight-reducing diet. We think you'll agree that the finished product will make a difference in your m***ive weekend warrior or obese boulevard bruiser.

    [​IMG]

    These two photos represent what is happening when the transmission is in First gear.

    The forward drum (or the top drum) is turning with the same rpm in the engine, while the direct drum (the lower drum) is turning 84 percent engine rpm in the opposite direction. This gives us an idea of how much easier it is for the transmission to spin and stop with the hubs in Kilgore's ******, compared to the heavy drums in the factory transmission. Remember the factory drums are 14 pounds each, while the hubs used in Kilgore's weigh about 4 pounds each.

    [​IMG]

    To shift from First gear to Second gear, the ****** will need to sp the direct drum instantly and start spinning the reaction carrier at 50% engine rpm. The reaction carrier pictured on the near left is an 8-pound factory piece, while the one shown on the far left is made of aluminum weighing in a 4 pounds.

    This means, the transmission is working half as hard when shifting. Kilgore offers a reaction carrier in sheet metal as well, which he designed to weigh less than 3 pounds. All of these changes are done to relieve stress on the rotating parts inside the trans, not just to make the transmission lighter.

    [​IMG]

    When the transmission shifts into high gear, everything must now instantly turn at engine speed. This means the direct drum is going from zero rpm to full engine rpm immediately, while the reaction carrier jumps from 50 percent engine speed to full engine speed. This is a whole lot of pressure on the rotating internal parts. Imagine stopping or starting a 14-pound drum at 5,600 rpm instant. It makes good sense to free the internal transmission parts from heavy rotation when it is simply robbing horsepower from the engine.

    [​IMG]

    The top two pieces are the factory reaction carrier ***embly, while the lower two are Kilgore's designed carrier ***embly. The differences here are not just weight, but also a change in rotating parts. Kilgore's carrier changes rotation from the drum (lower left) to the hub (lower right).

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Thinner frictions allow more plates to be added to the clutch pack, up to ten in the direct clutch.

    Kilgore uses high performance Alto Red Eagle clutches


    Sources:

    Kilgore Transmissions &
    Weld-Done Services
    727 Ruberta Ave., Dept. SC
    Glendale, CA 91201
    818-246-9471
    http://www.kilgoretrans.com/


     
  9. Fat47
    Joined: Nov 10, 2007
    Posts: 1,591

    Fat47
    Member

    Really interesting and helpful info here. Thanks "Abomination". Using what I learned from this thread I checked the 400 I have behind a 455 Buick in my 49 Sedanette in relationship to whether or not to purchase and add a kick down cable. The tag on the 400 indicates a 1979 build date. Back in the late 80's I used a 400 behind a 350 small block in a 47 chevy I built. I never added a kick down and put almost 50,000 miles on it with no problems. Now, from reading the posts here I realize that the kick down will give you some extra power for p***ing BUT MY QUESTION IS: if I'm worried about that is the kick down cable set up really necessary. Also, I ***ume the small canister on the p***enger side is for a vacuum line. Right???
     
  10. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    The 400 has an electric kickdown, it requires a switch on the throttle linkage, and a wire. Not a cable.

    The vacuum modulator requires vacuum. From the manifold, not the carb.
     
  11. Fat47
    Joined: Nov 10, 2007
    Posts: 1,591

    Fat47
    Member

    Jim, Sorry for the misuse of the cable notation. So, you are saying it is REQIRED! And thanks for the clarification on the vacuum origin.
     
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    The kickdown wiring is not required for the transmission to work. It's just a good idea to install it.
     
    Elcohaulic likes this.
  13. mohr hp
    Joined: Nov 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,569

    mohr hp
    Member
    from Georgia

    So, on Turbo 400's with 2 prong terminals with TCS, which terminal is which?
     
  14. Doublepumper
    Joined: Jun 26, 2016
    Posts: 1,808

    Doublepumper
    Member
    from WA-OR, USA

    From what I understand, the top terminal is for the converter and the bottom terminal is for the p***ing gear.
    See post #31
     
  15. mohr hp
    Joined: Nov 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,569

    mohr hp
    Member
    from Georgia

    I think you're talking Switch Pitch. I'm asking about 2 prong non-Switch pitch 400's.
     
  16. Doublepumper
    Joined: Jun 26, 2016
    Posts: 1,808

    Doublepumper
    Member
    from WA-OR, USA

    OK. Sorry, I don't know.... idunno.gif I've not seen one like you describe. One terminal may be for the ground or one side of the solenoid coil and the other terminal may be the power side of the coil. Might use a multi meter to determine if they opposite ends of the coil. Providing one side of the sol. coil isn't grounded to the trans. case, it shouldn't matter how the terminals are connected.
     
  17. milnersXcoupe
    Joined: May 9, 2009
    Posts: 1

    milnersXcoupe
    Member
    from new york

    Searching for BUICK Switch Pitch info I found this 19 year old Article
    containing contact for the builder of S-P Controllers - It Worked.

    https://www.chevelles.com/threads/switch-pitch-convertor-who-makes-em.59827/

    Switch Pitch Controller 2020 - Updated_Solid State Circuitry

    Contact Bruce at: bcroe@juno.com

    *bcroe replied:

    I built a hundred of this version, there are less than a quarter of them left.
    I have had to rework the design every decade or so, to stay in step with the constant evolution of electronic parts and their
    prices.

    But the function has not changed, except for a few custom units.

    The 65-67 Olds, Buick, & Cad TH300s & TH400s were Switch Pitch
    transmissions.

    Each brand had their own electrical control switch arrangements.
    However they all did the same thing.
    Kickdown was done with 12V applied to the bottom trans lug. 12V is applied to the upper terminal to set high stall (performance) mode, at idle or near
    full throttle; otherwise low stall (economy) mode is close to a conventional
    fixed converter.

    These controls were rather clumsy and unreliable, in my opinion.
    They ONLY used the SWP feature at idle or near full throttle.
    Getting parts to keep these controls working is increasingly a problem.

    I found the high stall can be used to improve midrange drivability,
    where the car operates most of the time.

    High stall during modest launches still gets up to speed faster, and also considerably smooths shifts.

    After braking for a turn, a burst of high stall pulls you back to
    speed.
    A request for more torque at speed can be done with high
    stall, often avoiding a downshift altogether.

    All this can be done, using an electronic controller sensing brake and torque (low manifold vacuum) and with delay timers.

    You still need a kickdown switch.
    I use a 70s style inside the car, mounted just above the gas pedal.
    The original may be used if it is still functional.

    There are pictures of all of these on my PHOTOBUCKET site.

    The interior factory switch 1242101 is still
    available, another is the B&M 20297 KICKDOWN SWITCH KIT.
    Both are on Ebay now.

    Note its satisfaction or I'll buy it back.
    For my controller send a check for $150 postpaid in USA. A
    recent rework has allowed me to change to all solid state, at
    this lowered price.

    There are pictures of linkage, various SWP control methods,
    parts, and my SWP controller with its flow diagram on my
    PHOTOBUCKET.

    Click on albums SWITCH PITCH
    TRANSMISSIONS, and BUILD A SWITCH PITCH TRANSMISSION.

    https://app.photobucket.com/u/bcroe

    BRUCE ROE
    5719 EAST SKINNER ROAD,
    STILLMAN VLY, IL 61084-9215
    phone 815 234-8039 solar powered since 2013 K9MQG since 1958
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 27, 2020
    rod1 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.