Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1935 Ford Front End Question

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Kruzin, Apr 16, 2014.

  1. Kruzin
    Joined: Aug 9, 2009
    Posts: 8

    Kruzin
    Member

    Hi I'm building a 1935 Ford and wanting to build a traditional style car. (Dropped axle & four bars)!
    Does anyone make a complete front end to suite what I'm after?
    I have found that allot of people use 34 ford front crossmember's & front ends!
    Would really appreciate your feedback


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  2. Dooley
    Joined: May 29, 2002
    Posts: 3,100

    Dooley
    Member
    from Buffalo NY

  3. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 4,126

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    4-bars arent traditional

    posted via smoke signals made with a Mexican blanket
     
  4. I am running a posies spring, superbell axle and 39 shock brackets in my 36. See no reason to change to 37 up Wishbone, works just fine.


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  5. threewindaguy
    Joined: Jun 9, 2007
    Posts: 291

    threewindaguy
    Member

    Skip the four bar, just split the bones, add a dropped axle, and pretso, you're traditional!
     
  6. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    I vote for dropping the four-bars. Any reason you are wanting them? Think it would add a lot to the cost and complexity of the build and decrease it's value (to anyone interested in traditional hotrods). Especially on a 35, I would really go traditional on that one.
     
  7. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    I'm calling Bull **** on that one!

    Roth used a 4 bar on the outlaw....built in 1959.

    they were very common on Indy cars in the 50's

    Pete and Jakes introduced theirs in 1974....over a decade before I was born.

    I think Grabowski and Ivo used them too...

    ****...

    Millers used a quarter elliptic 4-bar in the 20's.



    Here is a copy and paste of some pictures JimmyB posted.

    1951
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v605/jimmyschev/Hot Rods trend book 102/hotrods-pg-54.jpg

    1951-52
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v605/jimmyschev/Hot Rod Mag/fredcarilloTroadster-2.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v605/jimmyschev/Hot Rod Mag/fredcarilloTroadster.jpg

    http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4135/4899223871_be9bc04cce_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/12226979@N03/4899223871/)
    DSCF1018 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/12226979@N03/4899223871/) by Jimmy Bs 1925 Chev (http://www.flickr.com/people/12226979@N03/), on Flickr


    So yeah.....:rolleyes:
     
  8. edwardlloyd
    Joined: Aug 2, 2003
    Posts: 2,074

    edwardlloyd
    Member
    from Germany

    It's cheaper to have your axle dropped than to buy a new one. And it'll be a better axle. Use a reverse eye spring and you'll be low enough. If necessary you could split the bones but it's a bit involved on the later, spring in front of axle cars. You'll either have to heat and bent the perches or v-cut and weld the bones about 6 inches back from the axle. That's my preferred approach because it allows maximum steering. However you shouldn't need to split them with a dropped axle - their position doesn't change.


    Twitter @edsrodshop
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2014
  9. edwardlloyd
    Joined: Aug 2, 2003
    Posts: 2,074

    edwardlloyd
    Member
    from Germany

    @ Hitchhiker. Sure there have been four bar solutions for a hundred years, if you're counting semi elliptical springs, but I think the OP is considering some cheesy TCI type four bar solution which isn't traditional. Also this is a 35 Ford, not some hi tech Indy car.
    Ed


    Twitter @edsrodshop
     
  10. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    I'm just getting at that saying "four bars aren't traditional" is a blanket statement that is obviously wrong and is p***ing along incorrect information.

    Some very well known "traditional" cars used that design.

    that being said, yes, the street rod type 4 bars are not cool.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2014
  11. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    Also, look at Ivo's and Grabowski's.
    They are in the neighborhood of 40-44" length, (I recall laying out 'von' Franco's just prior to his moving the project)

    Very unlike the 24" 'stubbies' that originate from a Mustang box-on-its-side...
     
  12. geoford41
    Joined: Jul 26, 2011
    Posts: 766

    geoford41
    Member
    from Delaware

    Just a thought but 1935 up to 48 used a spring ahead of the Axle 34 was mounted along the axle centerline. The easy way out is to use a reverse eye spring posies or have your main leaf reversed or have a new one built, install a 4" dropped Axle (Magnum/Speedway CE etc.) new king pins on the spindles (after "dropping the arms) and if you are changing the engine/trans combo split the Bones with a kit available from Speedway/CE and away you go I have done that on my '41 Pickup and '40 coupe and they had the right stance. Oh I used the CE front shock kit, sweet especially with a CE sway bar.
     
  13. tub1
    Joined: May 29, 2010
    Posts: 549

    tub1
    Member
    from tasmania

    if you got a original ch***is with rear mount for wishbone use a original 35 front end get Garry Page to fix your axle and stubs ,get some 46 aussie front shock brackets ,make your axle into a aussie 40 type (pm for how )some ww2 jeep shocks and all is fixed ,re suspension ,then a hq box the one with least turns mate she is done
     
  14. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

    That's what I did on my '36. I whittled the stock truck spring down to 6 leaves from the original 13, split the bones to accommodate an engine/trans change.

    rides just fine and was very simple to do.


    Even though I prefer stock/split bones or hairpins I agree about 4-bars being as traditional as any other method. They've been around a long, long time.
     
  15. cheesegrater
    Joined: Sep 1, 2011
    Posts: 114

    cheesegrater
    Member
    from california

    My vote is for the split bones thinking that the MAJORITY of us would call that "TRADITIONAL" I have a very HARD STANCE on fenderless Fords & Its my "OPINION" so there is no open discussion and that is I DONT CARE IF IT WAS CARVED OUT OF A ONE PIECE HUGE BLOCK OF ALUMINUM OR ANYTHING THEY SHOULDNT HAVE INDEPENDENT FRONT SUSPENSIONS ON THEM
     
  16. Kruzin
    Joined: Aug 9, 2009
    Posts: 8

    Kruzin
    Member

    Hi everyone thank you for your feedback.
    It is a fully fended car.

    I want to purchase something new as the old stuff has been modified over the years by someone with no idea.

    Thanks


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  17. Why not just find another '35 / '36 front end and then modify that properly?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.