Register now to get rid of these ads!

Features 1932 1933 1934 Ford Victoria

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Antique Automotive, Apr 10, 2014.

?
  1. 1930-1931 Victoria humpback

    10.7%
  2. 1932 Victoria humpback

    42.9%
  3. 1933 Victoria humpback

    28.6%
  4. 1934 Victoria slantback with trunklid

    23.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. But it's **** is "**** ugly!"
    Forward folding seats and large doors really take care of rear acess. You can load p***engers of groceries or a cart full of small appliances.
    Most guys don't do a forward folding seat so rear acess is really limited then. Whatever you can drag over the seat that will fit under the headliner.

    Judging from the pics of those ladies with the luggage, there's no way to get a chair in that trunk anyway. There's not much room to maneuver between the opening and the structure and the deck lid then the backside of the back seat is right there. I wanna see a video of a chair going in.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2014
  2. Antique Automotive
    Joined: Jul 5, 2012
    Posts: 77

    Antique Automotive
    Member
    from San Diego

    HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS. The original 1933 schematic shows the Victoria humpback or bustle back.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,099

    50Fraud
    Member Emeritus

    I like all of the Victorias, but I like this '34 the best:

    [​IMG]

    In fact, out of all the pre-1940 Ford body styles, that one would be my first choice for myself.
     
  4. Doc.
    Joined: Jul 16, 2005
    Posts: 3,558

    Doc.
    Member Emeritus

    '33 "skirtless" Vicky for the win.
     
  5. rick finch
    Joined: May 26, 2008
    Posts: 3,329

    rick finch
    Member

    No preference, I like 'em all...

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Antique Automotive
    Joined: Jul 5, 2012
    Posts: 77

    Antique Automotive
    Member
    from San Diego

    Here's some more photos of the 1934 Ford Victoria with a trunk.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. 53 ford
    Joined: Apr 8, 2012
    Posts: 144

    53 ford
    Member

    The body molding above the tank skirt on the 33 breaks the big flat area the 34 has. Looking from the rear without the spare looks like the back of Darth Vader's helmet. 33 lowest production number, more rare than 3 window. Harley
     
    chickenridgerods likes this.
  8. Antique Automotive
    Joined: Jul 5, 2012
    Posts: 77

    Antique Automotive
    Member
    from San Diego

    I prefer having a hidden trunk on the 1934 Ford Victoria. I like the sleek look of the 1934 rear but I think all years 1930-34 Ford Victoria's look great. At one time I sold a beautiful 1933 Ford Victoria that was so early a production model there were no skirts on the fenders. That 1933 went to Utah. Does anybody know where it is now?
     
  9. Dave Mc
    Joined: Mar 8, 2011
    Posts: 3,066

    Dave Mc
    Member

    IMG_0633.JPG

    Like this one ? I have read somewhere the skirtless fender 33's were produced in the Northwest
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2014
  10. Antique Automotive
    Joined: Jul 5, 2012
    Posts: 77

    Antique Automotive
    Member
    from San Diego

    That's a great car and photo showing the rarest 1933 Ford Victoria and a 1934 Victoria in the background. The 1933 Victoria I sold to a Utah customer was dark blue with black fenders.
     
  11. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,696

    Weasel
    Member

    My '34 Vicky - I have a pair of extra 1934 Vicky tail lights - the long ones if anybody needs them....

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Dave Mc likes this.
  12. Antique Automotive
    Joined: Jul 5, 2012
    Posts: 77

    Antique Automotive
    Member
    from San Diego

    Beautiful 1934 Vickie. It has the right stance and a great color with big and little whitewalls. The little whitewall spare on this street rod also gives it a nostalgic unique look. Being a 1934 Vickie we know its a real Henry Ford car and not a wantabe fibergl*** kit car like so many of the 1932-33 Vickies.
     
  13. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,589

    verde742
    Member

    according to my friends who have cl***ics car lots, "everyone thinks Vickys are cute, but they are the hardest old Fords to sell"

    BTW: Don't you believe '34 Vickys didn't have a trunk... > " highly tooted" as a selling point'
     
  14. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,589

    verde742
    Member


    Where is a better picture, of the '34 with no trunk?
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2015
  15. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    This beauty is what should have been offered in Henry's Ford family. Positively elegant in planning and finishing!
     
    Dave Mc likes this.
  16. ratrod0
    Joined: Apr 15, 2005
    Posts: 1,183

    ratrod0
    Member

    32 my vote DSC06381_resized.JPG DSC06510 (1)_resized.JPG DSC06510 (1)_resized.JPG
     
    Dave Mc likes this.
  17. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,766

    alchemy
    Member

    It don't get no better than Hotrodo's Vicky.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2015
  18. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,279

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    All steel Ozzie car. From memory it runs a dressed flattie EVALLA11_228_p.jpg
     
  19. Dave Mc
    Joined: Mar 8, 2011
    Posts: 3,066

    Dave Mc
    Member

    Thanks Mike , here is a Topdown shot of my 33 ,Top folds neatly under the Boot IMG_0918.JPG
     
  20. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,099

    50Fraud
    Member Emeritus

    I don't think anybody has put up the two 4-door Victorias that Brizio has built in the last few years. One's a '32, the other a '33; one is Clapton's and the other is Mumford's (I think). I can't remember which is which.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Was this really necessary? Of course not, but they're neat.
     
    Dave Mc likes this.
  21. trad 34
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 8

    trad 34
    Member

    Recently got this one going after a 13 year build. Beach Hop 2015 015 (3)-min.jpg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.