Register now to get rid of these ads!

History ...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by sgtlethargic, Jul 19, 2024.

  1. ...
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2025
    hrm2k likes this.
  2. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,637

    flynbrian48
    Member

    Same as Mustang, just use Mustang 5 lug bits.
     
    hrm2k likes this.
  3. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,696

    69fury
    Member

    Ive heard that about the 60/61 birds. I do know that those years are undersized compared to the later ones, which lends credence to the matter. Also that the replacements for lowers are quite hard to find.

    -rick
     
  4. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,952

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well, that's one way to get around the "No M-II" rule.:rolleyes:
     
    '29 Gizmo and Johnny Gee like this.
  5. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,027

    Budget36
    Member

    @gimpyshotrods has insight on Falcon suspension from a 6 to a V8.
     
  6. kabinenroller
    Joined: Jan 26, 2012
    Posts: 1,292

    kabinenroller
    Member

    The steering linkage on 6 cyl. Cars is lighter duty compared to V8 cars, the control arms I believe are the same for both, ( confirm the ball joints are the same, I’m not sure) obviously the spring rates differ between the two.
     
    Automotive Stud likes this.
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,212

    squirrel
    Member

    you might want to be more specific what you mean by "early"
     
    MOONRNR and Beanscoot like this.
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,212

    squirrel
    Member

    Imagination is one thing, facts are something else :) from the moog catalog

    falc.jpg
     
    Cosmo49, 69fury, hrm2k and 1 other person like this.
  9. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    I've read that Ford beefed up the unibody for 1963, the first year the Falcon was offered with a V8. Horsepower & torque might be a greater concern than weight.
     
    MOONRNR and Budget36 like this.
  10. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    1960-1961.5 have the thinnest metal, and the fewest layers in the unibody. All V8 cars have thicker metal, and more layers than 6-cylinder cars.
    1960-1961.5 also have an undersized upper ball joint, with a smaller tapered hole in the spindle.
    After 1961.5 the front suspension parts are the same as the 1965-1966 Mustang.
    No center link, 6-cylinder or V8 for a Falcon is the same as a Mustang. The Falcon tub is narrower.
    6-cylinder tie rods are small than V8 tie rods.
    The tapered hole in the steering arm is smaller on the 6-cylinder spindle.
    The brakes are smaller on 6-cylinder cars, and the hubs are 4-lug.
     
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Mustang and 1960-1961 lower control arms are not the same.

    The bolt spacing for the radius arm is different.

    It is better to modify the radius arm by slotting the holes. The early lower control arms are obsolete.
     
    Davesblue50, alanp561 and Budget36 like this.
  12. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not exactly.
     
    Budget36 likes this.
  13. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,572

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm thinking that a friend of mine who put 5 lug pieces on a 60/61 Falcon used all 64/65 parts from A frames out when he did it. All I did on it was help him swap the upper control arms and then later aligned it for him at the Firestone store that I worked at. I'm thinking he went to the parts house or Ford dealers parts counter and bought upper and lower control arms and some other pieces after the simple spindle swap that someone else told him he could do didn't work.
    He didn't V8 swap it he just wanted to run Crager SS wheels on it.
    My Experience on any 60 up rear wheel drive Ford is you never assume any thing on brake or chassis parts you figure out the exact year and model it is and the original engine that it came with before ordering parts especially the Smaller cars = Falcons, Fairmonts and Mustangs.

    Looking at this parts list the main break is between 61 and 62 and then you have six cylinder/V8 to deal with.
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Pull a front wheel and photograph the upper ball joint. Clean it off first if it is cruddy.
     
    leon bee and sgtlethargic like this.
  15. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    It's common for all manufacturers to use different components, depending on the powertrain, gross vehicle weight, etc. Don't expect to get the results you're looking for by doing it on the cheap, and know what you're getting into before you start.
     
  16. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    First-generation small ball joint:
    upload_2024-7-19_18-11-51.png
    Three bolts.

    Second-generation (and Mustang-equivalent) ball joint:
    upload_2024-7-19_18-14-23.png
    Four bolts.
     
    hrm2k, leon bee and Budget36 like this.
  17. MOONRNR
    Joined: Dec 30, 2023
    Posts: 212

    MOONRNR
    Member

    Correct. The 1960/62 did not have torque boxes and had a lighter suspension/spindle.

    Have to know the exact year and what you are planning to do with it.

    But then again, leave it as it is and put a strong V8 in it. It will be a tire squealing wheel standing windshield launching crowd pleasing SOB.
     
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2024
    SS327 and leon bee like this.
  18. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,027

    Budget36
    Member

    Curious, but what year model of Falcon do you have?
     
  19. In_The_Pink
    Joined: Jan 9, 2010
    Posts: 958

    In_The_Pink
    Member

  20. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You can buy complete upper control arms for a 1965-1966 Mustang, and a tapered reamer.

    The hole in the spindle is a little smaller, but has the same taper. A little drill time with the reamer gets you away from obsolete parts.
     
    Cosmo49 likes this.
  21. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You can get complete lower control arms for the same, and slot the holes on the radius arms.

    That too gets you out of obsolete parts permanently.

    The Mustang stuff has the advantages of economy-of-scale, making it all way cheaper.
     
  22. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    A 3-bolt upper ball joint is $150.

    A complete later upper control arm is $87.

    An original lower ball joint is $130.

    A complete later lower control arm is $59.

    The original ball joint are weaker, too.

    This should not be a difficult decision.

    Also, if you change your mind about going 5-lug, you can then simply bolt on those spindles and brakes. There are even tapered shims to attach the 6-cylinder tie rods ends to the spindle.

    Cheap, too.

    While you are in there, get and install a 1" anti-sway bar, and do a Shelby-drop control arm relocation. The handling improvement from those are stark.
     
    Cosmo49 likes this.
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    A 200 is a bolt-in, up to about a 1966 block. Those still had both bellhousing patterns on the back of the block. Mustang guys dump these for cheap.

    Grab and freshen a 1980-end head from the yard, along with the Duraspark distributor and module. Grab the exhaust manifold, too. A Fairmont is a good donor.

    Take 0.090" (not a typo) off of the head. Swap-in the adjustable rocker arms from the 144. Block the EGR port.

    That's a solid 50hp, with junkyard parts.
     
  24. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Believe it or not, a 144 is about the same weight as a Ford Winsor V8, 260-302.

    My point with pointing you towards moving away from obsolete parts is that you can accomplish the minor modifications to the non-wear parts in a decent afternoon, or weekend.

    It would not only initially cost you less to do that, including the 29/64" drill bit, tapered reamer, Harbor Freight die grinder, and a burr, but it would leave you permanently set up to use much less expensive, and easily accessible fully new wear items going forward.

    Your current 3-bolt upper ball joints are a liability. Ford did away with them in less than two years from their introduction, because they tended to fail. I would not worry about the steering.
     
    ffr1222k, SS327 and Davesblue50 like this.
  25. For the early Mustangs Ford went to the expense of using a Fairlane suspension and not the Falcon suspension when a V8 engine was ordered. That should answer the question.

    Charlie Stephens
     
  26. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,696

    69fury
    Member

    400lbs per this wonderful list someone put together.

    My 60 Falcon already had a 67 Chevy Van front axle and my small block dodge has aluminum heads and intake, so the biggest problem i have is oil pan clearance...

    Common Engine Dimensions for the Engine Swapper (teambuick.com)
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2024
    sgtlethargic likes this.
  27. winr
    Joined: Jan 10, 2008
    Posts: 296

    winr
    Member
    from Texas

    All my Friends and I had that had early mustangs and Falcons with 6 cylinders did not have a bar connecting the left and right frame rail together under the engine.

    All the ones with V8s did.


    Ricky.
     
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    They all left the factory with one, from car #1.
     
    brianf31 likes this.
  29. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The suspension is exactly the same between the Falcon and the Mustang after 1962.

    The spindles and steering are the only differences between 6-cylinder and V8.

    Fairlane suspension is not interchangeable.
     
    deathrowdave, deuceman32 and MOONRNR like this.
  30. In_The_Pink
    Joined: Jan 9, 2010
    Posts: 958

    In_The_Pink
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.