Register now to get rid of these ads!

1950 Mercury Flathead

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by KillerFlathead, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. KillerFlathead
    Joined: Aug 12, 2006
    Posts: 13

    KillerFlathead
    Member
    from Calgary

    Hey, I recently bought a 1950 Mercury one ton truck for $350.00 for the flathead. Decided i wanted to use an old engine for my A tudor instead of a 302. It was a good find, it has a basically brand new bellhousing and clutch, and it doesnt seem to have been fun much since it was factory rebuilt. Just wondering how many carbs u can put on them. My boss was saying that any more then two and u get to much air and they dont run nice. So is there a way to add a third carb but have it not functioning? Thanks alot.

    New too it, but u gotta start somewhere.
     
  2. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,545

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    He is exactly right. Most flatheads. especially mildly bored and stoked flattys wont take much more fuel than two carbs.
    Dual intakes are much cheaper than triple set ups. You pay bigtime for the looks of three carbs especially when you will be blocking it off.
    Congratulations on your find. Glad to hear we have another flatheader in the group. You'll love to hate them. :)
     
  3. haring
    Joined: Aug 20, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    haring
    Member

    I am not a flathead expert, but I have all the various books dealing with flatheads, and the consensus is that two carbs flow the best amount of air through that engine.

    Go with a dual intake and two carbs. You'll impress those in the know with your smarts rather than impress those who don't know any better.
     
  4. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    Sure. You can put a thin metal plate under the center carb of a 3 deuce intake and solder up or epoxy up the fuel inlet fitting keeping the center carb empty. Hook straight linkage up on all 3 carbs. Synchronize the outer 2 carbs just like a dual carb intake. The middle one will just sit there and do nothing. You will probably get some whining about being a "poser" if you choose to tell them, but if it looks cool and performs well, you are the only one that needs to be pleased. Noone can tell without removing the aircleaner. It's done a lot more than people want to admit.
     
  5. Digger_Dave
    Joined: Apr 10, 2001
    Posts: 2,516

    Digger_Dave
    Member Emeritus

    I remember in high school when I wanted the "LOOK" of three carbs.
    Couldn't afford a 2 x 2, so settled for "cutting off" the carb bases from a couple of other manifolds and mounted them on a single manifold with "junk" carbs!
    They didn't work; but it sure fooled a lot of people! Plus I learned a bit about body work "moulding" the dummy bases on the single manifold with bondo then painting!!
     
  6. AlbuqF-1
    Joined: Mar 2, 2006
    Posts: 909

    AlbuqF-1
    Member
    from NM

    After dicking around with Holley 94's for the past 3 years, I'd be sorely tempted to try a Holley 350 cfm 4-barrel if it were me.... Unless you already have 2 cherry Strombergs or 94's that are absolutely "as new" or something. Old carbs suck!!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.