Register now to get rid of these ads!

1966 Nova Wagon ( now for some changes)

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by rob-redm, Sep 11, 2024.


  1. Thanks for that negative enthusiast comment.... will leave it at that... @Dick Stevens
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2025 at 12:01 PM
    porkshop likes this.
  2. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 25,965

    Deuces

    Those will still work on your motor...
     
  3. with the Blueprint crate engine... I may need run a thicker valve cover gasket or spacer on them... The price was right.. little concerned with the breather and PVC .. I'll mess around with them this weekend... Thank you @Deuces
     
    Deuces and porkshop like this.
  4. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,125

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I bought a pair new from the local Chevy store many years ago, looked just like them, don't recall if they had notches in the rails, I do know that the pre-1970 rocker covers did not have the cast-in drippers to improve rocker arm lubrication.


     
    Deuces and porkshop like this.
  5. Deuces and porkshop like this.
  6. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 4,975

    ekimneirbo

    My mistake, but the general concept..........a clean basically stock appearing 4 door wagon tends to project a fair amount of street driving in its future.:)

    I personally think that having gearing that provides for both performance and comfortable cruising is one of the most overlooked issues for many rodders. There are a lot of people who have built cars with performance gearing and then found that driving the car any distance was not a lot of fun..... Often those cars get driven sparingly. Met a guy last week at the grocery. He was driving an "unrestored" Chevy pickup (59) that sounded pretty healthy. Parked next to me and we began talking. He told me he had a 383 in it that he built with a 12:1 compression and had to run either aviation fuel or race gas in it.
    Now a lot of people would be impressed. Myself, I thought it was not a good choice and would have done it where it was more driveable. But........it was HIS truck and he was apparently happy with the results.

    I'm just pointing out that the choices anyone makes while building often affect how usable the completed vehicle is. Times have changed and speed limits are a lot higher, so its a lot tougher to enjoy cruising when you are relegated to the slow lane with semi's constantly approaching from behind.......or move over to the fast lane and and drive at 3500/4000 rpms for miles. A lot of hot rods do not get driven a lot simply because they aren't geared well for cruising as part of the overall equation we call a hot rod.:)
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2025 at 11:03 AM
  7. couldn't be more right..
     
    ekimneirbo likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.