Register now to get rid of these ads!

2007 HA/GR rules

Discussion in 'HA/GR' started by Rand Man, May 28, 2007.

  1. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal
    1. HA/GR owners group

    Mr Mac,

    It ain't hard to admit any of it, just gettin' harder to recall it all. :D
     
  2. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,432

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

  3. kenagain
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 820

    kenagain
    Member
    from so cal

    Hey does a stock model b bellhousing and tranny on an A bone motor need a scattershield ? there aint no such thing as a stamped steel bellhousing for those setups that I know of, Also what ever became of the conversation about model A engines with OHV heads on them??
    thanks
    Ken
     
  4. REJ
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 1,612

    REJ
    Member
    from FLA

    Ken, I built my own scattershield out of 1/4" plate for my dodge truck tranny. It is probably as easy to find one for your s as this one.
    I have not had any problems at tech with it either.
    As far as the ohv for the banger, you would have to PM Ryan on that one.
     
  5. Exactly! I read on another thread about some alleged "Auto Trans 4 barrel carb BS"... well, the only BS is coming from the guys who don't want to play by the rules.

    Rules are there to keep the cars looking old and the fun factor high.

    Sam.

     
  6. Oilcan Harry
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 906

    Oilcan Harry
    Member
    from INDY

    Wish someone would point us to a mountain of LaSalle transmissions just waiting for a dragster.
     
  7. storm king
    Joined: Oct 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,989

    storm king
    Member

    I'm glad you all aren't bending to the pressure of some folks to allow the autos and new carbs. They can still run, just not this class. That is great. Maybe 64Dodge440 will back me up when I say in nostalgia racing in general, they have allowed folks to continually 'creep' on allowing 1]aluminium heads,2]four linked suspensions,3]stupid oversized scoops,4] huge, modern sized tires, and on and on to where it is a joke. Keep it true and simple to the INTENT; and screw
    the rest.
    The car I'm building won't fit that class; but that class does have some interest to me, so I may build something that FITS it, instead of trying to make you bend the class for me.
     
  8. GrantH
    Joined: Aug 10, 2006
    Posts: 523

    GrantH
    Member

    when did things like the quarter eliptical rear setups start? is this a modern "fix" for a 4 link style rear setup or was this done back in the day?
     
  9. GrantH
    Joined: Aug 10, 2006
    Posts: 523

    GrantH
    Member

    I am calling a guy this week about a car. if it's able to be parted out I may be able to help you. It's a very solid car though...
     
  10. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,432

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    AMEN, current "nostalgia" racing tends to fit into the category of "it sort of looks like the class used to be, with some modern stuff added because we think it's better".

    Don't really care for classes where you can "go too fast" and lose. Always figured that the purpose of racing was to see who was the "fastest and quickest". If you are going to have classes, keep it simple, pounds per cubic inch works well, with sub-categories for carburetors, injectors and blowers.

    Gas classes burn gasoline, isn't that why they called them "gas class"?

    Alcohol classes burn alcohol, and "Fuel classes" burn anything that they want up to and including old gym shorts.

    Seems like everyone always tries to find a loophole to get around the rules or make things "more equal". I far prefer "run whatcha brung racing", and let the fastest guy win, and as for the HA/GR class, lets build the cars with imagination, and do it for fun in "the spirit of the Bug".

    If someone wants to build a car for a 12.00 breakout class fine, but I feel it would be far better if the class was set for 4 pounds per cu. in. with no minimum weight, vintage carbs in the spirit of the concept and pump gas as the fuel, and if they could run an 11.97 great, they deserve to win.

    My goal is to run in the high 12's and psych them on the line.

    Also feel that it would be neat to have the tree set for green only, no yellows after you stage and vary the time for the green. Try and bring back the kind of racing they had when the races started with a flag rather than a computer.

    End of rant.......off my soap box for now.:D
     
  11. 348chevy
    Joined: Apr 2, 2007
    Posts: 431

    348chevy
    Member

    I would prefer that they give a guy a couple of flags and let him flag the race like it was until 1964 or 5. But barring that lets go to stage and then green. We could do that I think with the light system they have now with no modifications. I know they can stage and then all yellow then green with no count down of the yellow. I usually leave on the next to last yellow to cut a good light but with the stage then green you would have to react really fast:D. Lets see where did I put my Alzheimer's medicine?;) Roy
     
  12. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,432

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    That's what I'm talking about, real reaction times, rather than anticipating the delay in the tree. Something to keep us old farts sharp and make the racing fun.
     
  13. Rick Sis
    Joined: Nov 2, 2007
    Posts: 710

    Rick Sis
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    This is my first post on the HAMB. I thought I would start here because I have some questions about HA/GR. I really like the HA/GR concept, and whenever I hear about affordable heads up racing, I'm always interested.

    I'm from Tulsa, and I'm interested in knowing more about what exactly is going on with the SDRA, such as who is the SDRA, how many cars involved, etc.

    In making the decision to build or not, I need to know what I'm getting into locally. I would personally have no interest in an outlaw group. I would want to run with the HAMB rules with everyone else. I was concerned when I have seen opinions like, they have their place to run, let them do as they please, when I would be wanting to run by the rules and this would be my home track, and I wouldn't want to be known as one of the "Tulsa outlaws".

    I was at the recent Tulsa nostalgia drags and what I saw seemed to add to the confusion. It was my understanding that this was to be a SDRA event, with a HAMB invitation. I didn't inspect all the cars carefully, but I can only remember seeing 2 cars that were obviously outlaw, the rest and majority were HA/GR. The deviation from the HA/GR rules in these cars should account for at least a solid .7 advantage in a well sorted out car. Enough to ruin heads up racing with the HAMB cars.

    Also, I was surprised that this event was promoted with the HAMB name. The announcer always referred to these cars as "HAMB dragsters", call to staging was for "HAMB dragsters", never a mention of SDRA, or anything else.

    So, I suppose what I want to know is, does the SDRA just consist of a few cars now running, and are there more people wanting to run Tulsa by HA/GR rules than these few outlaws? I have the feeling that there are probably more than just me that are not building until they see how this plays out.
     
  14. mudflap261
    Joined: Oct 24, 2005
    Posts: 588

    mudflap261
    Member
    from tulsa

    If you will come out to TRP today at 1 for tnt I will be more than happy to go over the Hornets car and the rules with you and whats going on Larry Jones
     
  15. Rand Man
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 5,214

    Rand Man
    Member

    The announcer (that day) at Tulsa didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. He kept running his mouth all day on stuff he knew nothing about. We drove over from Arkansas to run with them and had a good time. Outlaws can be beat if you're on your game. Go ahead and build it HAMB rules.
     
  16. 2b-banjo
    Joined: Jan 10, 2004
    Posts: 232

    2b-banjo
    Member

    I was one of the ha/gr rails that raced at Tulsa that day, the .7 sec gap between my rail and the winner is not based on a auto trans and 4 barrel carb. That is an extremely well built light car. If I lived in Tulsa like you do I would surely build to race the SDRA races, next year they are having 7 races plus the Old Time Drags. Ha/gr you only have one race at Mo/kan. So if you want to race more than just test and tune, this is the way to go. There race format also has the losers in a porch dog group, so you can continue racing. So me and cowboy Bob(another ha/gr) driving 15 hrs can race all day instead of getting put on the trailer if losing the 1st round. My car will stay a ha/gr car, but will be doing some changes to try an be more competetive in the SDRA races. So think about it before you build a car for 1 wk a summer.
    2b-banjo
     
  17. 348chevy
    Joined: Apr 2, 2007
    Posts: 431

    348chevy
    Member

    I was under the idea that the SDRA was the same as HAMB except for the auto trans and 4 barrel carb. Bob Hindman was the person who got me into this thing. I assumed that I could join SDRA as soon as my car was built and could run both HAMB and SDRA. The only thing is I have a stick trans and 3 two barrel carbs. Bob said I could have 348 as my car number. Is there some reason that a car can't run both as long as the rules are met for both? Bob Hindman was really nice to me and was enthusiastic for me to run a car. I chose to run a stick because I wanted to run HAMB also. I plan on adding another roll bar but that shouldn't hurt the status of the car.:confused: Roy
     
  18. Mr. Mac
    Joined: May 16, 2005
    Posts: 1,971

    Mr. Mac
    Member

    No reason at all, We run both classes and so does several other guys.
     
  19. mudflap261
    Joined: Oct 24, 2005
    Posts: 588

    mudflap261
    Member
    from tulsa

    YOU or any HAMB car is welcome to run SDRA events L JONES one of the directors .
     
  20. bradleybrothers
    Joined: Nov 18, 2007
    Posts: 4

    bradleybrothers
    Member

    hey everyone i am new to all of the rules and regs. Me and my brother 22 and 15 and trying to build a homb dragster for the both of us. From stillwater oklahoma if anybody around this area please contact me have lots of questions. And would apperatice all the help i can get. Thank you
     
  21. bradleybrothers
    Joined: Nov 18, 2007
    Posts: 4

    bradleybrothers
    Member

    hey everyone i am new to all of the rules and regs. Me and my brother 22 and 15 and trying to build a homb dragster for the both of us. From stillwater oklahoma if anybody around this area please contact me have lots of questions. And would apperatice all the help i can get. Thank you
     
  22. autobilly
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 3,414

    autobilly
    Member

    My 2c. Unfortunately rules are req'd. so that were all on the same page. Regarding this, i beleave moparsled hit the nail on the head. Polatics, profesionalization and the ultimate persuit of the lowest et. split hot rods and drag racing, thus ending the days of the "spirit" of which we seek to rekindle/replicate.
     
  23. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,432

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Therefore, it's our job to rekindle the flame and keep that spirit. We may have a rough road to travel in this quest, but with true hot rodder's ingenuity and determination we can succeed. As the years pass, and our origins fade, we need to keep the vision and retain some of "where it all began" in action and not stored away in a museum, but out front where it can be enjoyed and savored, planting the seeds in those who will keep the reality alive.
     
  24. 17dracing
    Joined: May 15, 2008
    Posts: 362

    17dracing
    Member
    from Indiana

    Hey guys I'm new to this class , but I'm going to build one anyways ,So here is my question ! Can I use a chopped and narrowed 46 international truck cab for my body ? Or do I need to stay with the classic tub ? Going to be running a straight 6 also !!!!
     
  25. FiddyFour
    Joined: Dec 31, 2004
    Posts: 9,024

    FiddyFour
    Member

    you COULD build a body like that, but its gonna weigh a few hunnert pounds more'n it needs to
     
  26. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal
    1. HA/GR owners group

    Howdy, from a relocated Hoosier.

    Some of my friends and I've considered eventual drop-on bodies for our cars. Haven't done anything as yet but several ideas have been brought up.

    Perhaps you could build a basic car, then do something in that vein.
     
  27. GMC BUBBA
    Joined: Jun 15, 2006
    Posts: 3,420

    GMC BUBBA
    Member Emeritus


    Shouldnt be a problem, stay with the 1962 and older parts etc.
    Out friends overseas have built a couple with roadster bodies etc and they look pretty good.
    A 46 International cut down to size would be pretty appropiate.......study some of the builds from drewfus on this forum...

    Jim
     
  28. we ran alot of races with flaggers it was easy to anticipate when the flag would drop when we went to a new track the first thing was to study the flagman
     
  29. HAMBstirrer
    Joined: Jul 8, 2008
    Posts: 45

    HAMBstirrer
    Member
    from Kempsey

    Well I have just about finished my second HA/GR car. I have adhered to the rules as strictly as they are written. Maybe I just think toooooo far out of the square for most people. 225 errect six pre 1962, 3 Ford 97's on a custom manifold, 3 speed with a straight through home built shifter, 4.11 : 1 borg warner diff. 6 point roll cage. Based on a 1924 Morris Cowely chassie and suspension.
    Tell me what you fellas in the USA think? The Slicks? just a shit stir. :D
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 29, 2010

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.