Register now to get rid of these ads!

230 chevy six ?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 29AV8, Nov 2, 2010.

  1. 29AV8
    Joined: Jan 12, 2009
    Posts: 222

    29AV8
    Member

    Went to an older womans house today to help out a friend put on a chimney cap. I was rummaging around her old barn found what looked to be an old chevy six. its a 230. so I asked of course is that for sale. she says no. but you can have it if ya want. great I say.
    just goes to show you how helping people out works for both of you.
    oh yea forgot it does not have a flexplate. need one if anybody has one.
    and will a turbo 350 trans bolt to this. looks like it will. I have some 51 ford stuff I would be willing to trade.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  2. dt50chev
    Joined: Mar 15, 2005
    Posts: 596

    dt50chev
    Member

    The 230 shares the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the small block and big block chevy engines. Your turbo 350 will bolt right up.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  3. Good little motor too by the way .
    Stock was like 140 HP and 220 ft lbs-enough to get a big old early chevy full size up on plane ...and pretty derned good on gas
     
  4. halfcockedcustoms
    Joined: Jun 5, 2007
    Posts: 640

    halfcockedcustoms
    Member

    sbc flexplate will work also
     
  5. 4 pedals
    Joined: Oct 8, 2009
    Posts: 987

    4 pedals
    Member
    from Nor Cal

    The later model Chevy 6s are good engines. I built one years ago, started with a 230, swapped in a 250 crank and 307 pistons I believe, with a head from a 194 with upgraded valves to 1.94/1.50, a cam and dual headers from Cliffords and 3 custom made diagonal intake manifolds each with a stock 1bbl carb. Didn't like to run on cold mornings due to lack of manifold heat. Lots of small block parts interchange. I think 283 pistons work in a 230. And they have 7 main bearings, as opposed to the 3 in a 235. I found out stock rods were only good to about 6500 rpm when i ventilated mine one night. Build it to run good, stick a T5 or 700R4 behind it and you'll be golden.

    devin
     
    GuyW likes this.
  6. lake_harley
    Joined: Jun 4, 2017
    Posts: 2,501

    lake_harley
    Member

    I'm contemplating building a 230 Chevy 6-banger for racing and have read for years about using 283 or 307 pistons. I would like to see about 10.5:1 compression but wonder how the difference in valve angle and dome location and size would work out using the V-8 pistons with the 6-cylinder head. As I understand it the 6 cylinder uses a 12° valve angle in relation to the block deck compared to 23° on the V-8s. I hope someone has some personal experience using the V-8 pistons.

    Thanks in advance.

    Lynn
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  7. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,096

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    A friend put 283 pistons in a 230 with a decent street camshaft and had no problem with valve to piston clearance. He also used a Rochester 4GC from a 283 on an Offenhauser intake manifold that worked out well.
     
    dan c, lake_harley and Sharpone like this.
  8. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,948

    Joe H
    Member

    307 flat top fit right in a 250, but you need to make sure they truly flat top. I bought a set for mine, when I got them open, they had a large chamfer around the top and 8 valve relief. They were more of a universal flat top meant for multiple years of engine and not right for any of them. From what I read, it's about 1 point of compression increase going to the V8 pistons in the 230 or 250.

    The block numbers are the same for the 230 and 250, you need to look at the top of the pistons or measure the stroke to know for sure which engine it is. Heads are the same for both engines.
     
    Sharpone and lake_harley like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.