Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 26 T Roadster Pick Up build Thread

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Blue One, Mar 27, 2010.

  1. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Update time. :) Spent 2 long days working in the garage,and finished up the wishbones.

    Since I wanted to run them to the outside of the frame rails it presented a challenge given that I had curved the frame out to follow the gentle curve of the T body.

    Because of that, there was no room for a wishbone to run straight from the brackets off the rear end to the side of the framerail.

    The rear end brackets would have been tight against the brake backing plate leaving no room for the e-brake cable etc.

    So, the solution was to put a 5 degree bend into the wishbone allowing it to sneak around and clear the rear corner of the frame and follow along the side to the front mount.

    The frame mounts for the heims were done the same way I did for the front bones.

    As you can see the rear bones are also drilled and sleeved with tubing as the front ones are.

    The next step will be the top link of the rear suspension to complete the 3 link set-up.

    Then will be the coil over mounts. Here's some pics. It's starting to look like a hot rod chassis !
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 3, 2010
    e-tek and volvobrynk like this.
  2. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Bump for the day crowd !
     
  3. marioD
    Joined: Nov 20, 2005
    Posts: 231

    marioD
    Member

    Top notch again Larry!


    Mario
     
  4. nightperson
    Joined: Feb 1, 2008
    Posts: 90

    nightperson
    Member

    nice build- i am starting one myself
     
  5. langy
    Joined: Apr 27, 2006
    Posts: 5,730

    langy
    Member Emeritus

    Only just found this thread, Its amazing how easy it is to miss good stuff on here. Great to see you using a Y block, I have a built 292 with Fenton tri setup that i'm itching to put into a little modified.

    Look forward to the updates.
     
  6. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta


    Good stuff :) Thanks, that's nice to hear coming from you.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  7. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Another small update, made my rear lower coil over mounts, got them welded up using 1/4" plate and tacked them to the rear axle.

    I only tacked them in place as when I get it sitting on the floor I may have to move them slightly around the housing when I dial in my pinion angle.

    Larry
     

    Attached Files:

    volvobrynk likes this.
  8. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    Excellent build thread. Are you going to "BOX" in the rearend wishbone plates or just leave them exposed and parallel like you have them now?

    Frank
     
  9. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta


    I had in mind to look at the section where it rises up to the top heim and possibly drill through there and add another tube- hole.

    Otherwise I'll leave them open.

    There is plenty of strength there even to a sideways load, they are 1/4" plate.

    What did you have in mind ?
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  10. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    If you mean the plates on the rear end itself, I'll leave them open, just weld around them.
     
  11. selohssa
    Joined: Jun 16, 2009
    Posts: 443

    selohssa
    Member

    Great job. I am looking forward to seeing this on the road.
     
  12. Looking great, can't wait to see this done!
     
  13. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Thanks fellas, I have been on this project a relatively short time and have made decent progress.

    It's gonna take a while, I'm building everything I possibly can, then comes the factor we all have to face is the $ come slowly sometimes.

    I don't want this to take forever though. Doing my best. :)
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  14. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    A little more progress.

    I built the upper shock mounts and tacked them into place with the bars I have drilled at 13" to set ride height for my TCI All American coil overs bolted in.

    After that I was looking at different designs for the rest of the rear suspension.

    I decided on a pair of upper bars angled from the top of the pumpkin (4 bar style ).

    Fabricated the bars, brackets and all then welded - tacked it all in place.

    Have a look at the pictures.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 30, 2010
    juan motime and volvobrynk like this.
  15. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

  16. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Couple more little things today, went out to the garage to clean it up and then started doing stuff instead :).

    I beefed up the corners of the kickup a little, maybe overkill but will give me a little peace of mind.

    Also added some small braces to the upper front 4 bar mounts.
     

    Attached Files:

    volvobrynk likes this.
  17. rustisgold
    Joined: Dec 12, 2007
    Posts: 456

    rustisgold
    Member

    correct me if im wrong, but without a pivot point at the diff on the lower 'bones' wont the suspension bind a great deal as it trys to travel?
     
  18. nice build. be watching for updates.
     
  19. Lost_N_Austin
    Joined: May 26, 2008
    Posts: 125

    Lost_N_Austin
    Member
    from Some Beach

    rustisgold, I'm with you on this one. It is time to remove the "hangers" and the Mock-up shocks and move this rear end up and down with a floor jack. I have concerns but I know nothing. It is worth checking now though and I hope I'm wrong.

    Very nice fabrication and welding. Keep after it.

    Lost_N_Austin
     
    scullandcrossspaners likes this.
  20. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta


    Went out to the garage and removed all of the support brackets and the coil over mock up bars too.

    Hooked my engine hoist to the rear end through the hole in the top bracket of the rear end.

    Moved the suspension up and down and it moves well through the range of up and down motion needed.

    There is some binding as expected if one side tries to move up and the other side stays down. I get about 2" up and down movement without too much trouble before it binds.

    Any suggestions ? I'm doing my suspension based on an already used idea so ??

    Here are some pics I used for reference. This is a 32 apparently.

    EDIT - And, the damned thing must ride like a truck with no suspension at all ! After what I discovered with mine this design ends up as a very big very stiff anti sway bar and gives almost no side to side suspension action when one wheel passes over a bump the rear end is not able to react properly with one wheel rising and the other staying down on the pavement.
    Poor design to copy as I have discovered.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Nov 14, 2010
    volvobrynk likes this.
  21. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Ok well I messed around with it and it appears that a re-design is in order :) Oh well crap happens !

    I unhooked and removed the top heim joint from the plates I designed for the rear end.

    Once I did that then I get plenty of articulation and the rear end can move up and down freely from side to side.

    It removes the "sway bar" effect and allows it to work smoothly, as in it will allow one side of the rear end to go up and the other to drop as a wheel goes over a bump on uneven pavement.


    So a re-design of the wishbones and rear end mounting plates with only one lower pivot point is in order.

    I have it in my head and will post pics as I get it built.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2010
    volvobrynk likes this.
  22. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,691

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    Blue One, this is an interesting delima. I wonder if the front mounts allowed it to twist (heim joints?). With a top 2 bar, you should only need a single bottom. when we talked I thought you were running a transverse spring (like I am). that might allow it to pivot.

    Did you try unhooking the top 2 bars and see how it moved with just the lower (curious more then anything)

    Since I was also going to build something similar to the pictures of the green 32, I will have to think about it more. that was a professional shop that does some outstanding rides.. maybe someone on here knows the car
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2010
  23. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Yes the top bars were unhooked, made no difference with the "sway bar torsion effect" of having the wishbone solidly mounted to the rear end with 2 heims.

    Having a single bottom pivot will allow the rear end to move as it should.

    As soon as I removed the top 2 heims from the wishbones , the rear end worked really nicely in all directions.

    I had originally thought of using the transverse rear spring, but decided to go coil overs in search of a good ride.

    As far as the green car being professionally built, it is not the first time something less than ideal in function was rolled out of a pro shop.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
    volvobrynk likes this.
  24. GizmoJoe
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,300

    GizmoJoe
    Member

    Well dah! Yes... keep it coming, please!
    I subscribed long ago. :)
     
  25. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 6,052

    atch
    Member

    as did many more of us.
     
  26. daddio211
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 6,012

    daddio211
    Member

    Uhhh.... yeah! I subscribed a while back so I wouldn't miss your updates! GIMME MORE BLUE ONE!
     
  27. HotRodMicky
    Joined: Oct 14, 2001
    Posts: 1,783

    HotRodMicky
    Member

    I just found this thread.
    Good to see that you tested your suspension before you finished everything.
    I see a lot of "wrong" designed suspensions on Hot Rods......
    Mostly on the rear.

    I like the `32 style frame idea

    Michael
     
  28. rustisgold
    Joined: Dec 12, 2007
    Posts: 456

    rustisgold
    Member

    im kinda wishing ida kept that body, but i like the build quallity your putting into the car-nice work
     
  29. nightperson
    Joined: Feb 1, 2008
    Posts: 90

    nightperson
    Member

    you can use the split wishbones and then just make it a triangulated 4 link. [​IMG]
     
  30. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,493

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Well update time. I modified the wishbones I made to go to a single pivot point below the rear end.

    Removed all the heim joints except the ones on the front of the wishbones where they attach to the frame.

    Fabricated all new mounting points with all urethane bushings.

    Now that it's all together I tested it all out and the difference is really amazing. I now have a smoothly moving suspension that articulates well from side to side with no binding through a larger range of suspension movement than the coil overs will allow, both up and down as well as side to side.

    Gone is the "sway bar effect" of the last design :)

    Needless to say I'm pretty happy with the results of my "modified triangulated 4 bar design".

    Pictures below. Larry.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 207.JPG
      207.JPG
      File size:
      182.3 KB
      Views:
      1,293
    • 206.JPG
      206.JPG
      File size:
      205.4 KB
      Views:
      1,297
    • 208.JPG
      208.JPG
      File size:
      179.7 KB
      Views:
      1,264
    • 209.JPG
      209.JPG
      File size:
      192.6 KB
      Views:
      1,261
    • 210.JPG
      210.JPG
      File size:
      169.3 KB
      Views:
      1,261
    • 212.JPG
      212.JPG
      File size:
      252.2 KB
      Views:
      1,274
    • 000.jpg
      000.jpg
      File size:
      163.5 KB
      Views:
      1,216
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2010
    volvobrynk likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.