Register now to get rid of these ads!

28 ford 4 banger

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hotrod-28, Nov 30, 2011.

  1. hotrod-28
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 19

    hotrod-28
    Member
    from dayton

    Hello i have a 28 ford sedan that im builling and i was thinking of useing a ford ranger 4 banger in it but wich ranger motor is best ?
     
  2. caseyscustoms
    Joined: May 15, 2005
    Posts: 1,031

    caseyscustoms
    BANNED
    from st.joe, MO

    google would be a good start.
     
  3. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    There is a thread on here about the 1.9,2.0,2.3 engines which will tell you all you need to know about these engines. Search...
     
  4. George Miller
    Joined: Dec 26, 2008
    Posts: 413

    George Miller
    Member
    from NC usa

    What do you want to do with it. The later A blocks have a stronger main web. 28 have a 5 main camshaft. I have used both with good results. Some like the B engine better, they have bigger bearings on the crank. But they crack easier in the valve area.
     
  5. cruzr
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 3,127

    cruzr
    Member Emeritus

    My buddy owns this one, its running a Pinto engine with a 39 ******
     

    Attached Files:

  6. John Denich
    Joined: Nov 20, 2005
    Posts: 2,718

    John Denich

    My Buddy Rick has a track-T with a Pinto in it and drives it everywhere! It was in Rodders Journal about 10 years ago....its Yellow very reliable!
     
  7. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,498

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I think all the Ford Ranger 4 cylinder motors had 5 main and camshaft bearings. You might not have understood that he is considering using an OHV motor, rather than the early Ford banger.
     
  8. I have a '32 Ford roadster with a 181 cubic inch Mercruiser marine engine. I made this conversion in 1985. This is basically a larger version of the old Chevy II engine (there is a ton of information on these engines in the archives). I am happy with this engine since a simple adapter intended to mate a SBC to an early Ford transmission (this is what everyone was doing in the sixties and the adapters are available at swap meets or new) allowed me to run a '39 transmission and the stock rear end. The installation in a Model A is slightly more difficult since you need to make provisions for the pedals and wishbone mount (kits are available). If I had it to do over I would leave the original engine in the car but this is in no way a reflection on the conversion, I just tend to lean more towards original especially as I get older. The nice thing about this conversion is that it required no cutting and can be reversed.

    Charlie Stephens
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2011
  9. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

  10. George Miller
    Joined: Dec 26, 2008
    Posts: 413

    George Miller
    Member
    from NC usa

    You are right my fault I read it wrong. I though he wanted to know about Model A engines. I read it again and seen where I messed up.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.