Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 283 CHEVY CAM SUGGESTIONS?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 29StudeDude, Nov 2, 2018.

  1. 29StudeDude
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 353

    29StudeDude
    Member

    I am building a '65 283 SBC for my '29 Studebaker Coupe, and need some camshaft suggestions. I am looking for a slightly lopey idle, and something that works well with a "Performer" style intake, headers, and an electronic "Ignitor" kit hidden under the stock cap. It's what I have laying around the shop, and if you can't sell it for squat, you may as well use it!
     
    Flogknaw, bobss396 and chryslerfan55 like this.
  2. bowie
    Joined: Jul 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,221

    bowie
    Member

    The cl***ic for it would be the L79 327/350 horse hyd cam. Unless you want solids, then I would say a Duntov or a 30/30.
     
  3. Nailhead Jason
    Joined: Sep 18, 2012
    Posts: 4,515

    Nailhead Jason
    Member

    you cant go wrong with a 283 and the old Duntov 097 cam. Yes it is a solid lifter cam, but if you set the lash with poly locks you wont be adjusting them often at all. Speed Pro sells a copy of it for way less than trying to find a NOS one or one of the "Factory Muscle Car" cams. Speed Pro Part number is CS-113R.

    here is a link to it on summits website.

    https://www.summitracing.com/parts/slp-cs-113r
     
  4. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,103

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The best 3 Chev street cams are listed above....nuf said.
     
  5. buffaloracer
    Joined: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 823

    buffaloracer
    Member
    from kansas

    I still like comp cams 268 in either version.
     
  6. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,522

    Fordors
    Member

    If you choose a GM cam I would stick with the ‘097. The timing it has is more suited to the lower compression of the 283.
     
  7. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Plus it sounds right on the slight lope and on the subtle solids clatter. Many other cams sound like they were bought for the sound effects, like a tin can full of rocks and a carbon tracked distributor effect.
     
    winduptoy and 29StudeDude like this.
  8. Fry
    Joined: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 990

    Fry
    Member
    from SK, Canada

    Last edited: Nov 2, 2018
    mad mikey and 29StudeDude like this.
  9. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,840

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    097 in a 283. Have used many over the years. Love the sound and makes decent vacuum-about 14"
    The lifters will stay adjusted unless you wing it up alot. Had one in my 57 Fuely and 62 Vette--adjusted about once a year unless I really spun it a good bit. Elgin makes an excellent copy.
     
  10. What's the compression ratio ?
    You'll need lots of it to run the cams listed.
     
    Dyce and XXL__ like this.
  11. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,478

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    You didn't say what transmission you are using but GM didn't offer an automatic with the l79 option, they were more concerned about warranty type issues, but it's my default suggestion when people ask when building a street 327.
    I don't have personal experience with it in 283's but like Vicky infers; compression in the 10/1 range may allow it as the L79 came from the factory with 11.250/1 c.r.
    I do think the 283 with this cam would benefit from using Rhoads lifters (Google them), plus they kind of sound like solid lifters.


    The Comp 268 was a great cam in my 357 (350+.040), again I have no experience in a 283 but I think my above suggestions still apply.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2018
  12. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,726

    flynbrian48
    Member

    That’s what’s (supposedly) in the 283 in my ‘34. It’s happy being fed by twin 500 E-carbs on an old Iffy 360 and “PowerPak” heads. Nice lopey idle, pulls hard, sounds great, works good in my fairly light car, a Turbo 350 with a shift kit.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app View attachment 4082872
     
    mad mikey likes this.
  13. 29StudeDude
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 353

    29StudeDude
    Member

    It's all stock, and I will be using a 700R4 trans.
     
  14. 29StudeDude
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 353

    29StudeDude
    Member

    I have read with the stock low compression, that you can't use 2.02 heads or other large valves, because you will kill the performance.
     
    rod1 likes this.
  15. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,522

    Fordors
    Member

    The factory rated compression ratio is 9.25 for the ‘65 283’s and the 270 horse 283’s that used the ‘097 cam from ‘57 to ‘61 were 9.5 compression.
    Regarding your post about the heads the 2.02 intakes won’t clear the 3 7/8 bore of the 283 and also you would be going from 58 cc combustion chambers to chambers that are typically 64 cc or larger, with the resulting loss of compression.
     
    mad mikey likes this.
  16. 29StudeDude
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 353

    29StudeDude
    Member

    What's your opinion on the L79 then with that compression ratio? I would like to stick with hydraulic lifters.
     
  17. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,522

    Fordors
    Member

    The L79 cam has a lobe center angle of 114* which means there is not a lot of valve overlap that would bleed off compression. It should be fine.
     
    Just Gary, mad mikey and 29StudeDude like this.
  18. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,994

    Roothawg
    Member

    I have built dozens of 265's and 283's. The best all around cam is the comp cam 260H. It works perfect with the Performer intake.

    Operating Range: 1200-5200 RPM
    Duration Advertised: 260° Intake / 260° Exhaust
    Duration @ .050'' Lift: 212° Intake / 212° Exhaust
    Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .440'' Intake / .440'' Exhaust
    Lobe Separation Angle: 110°
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2018
    fastcar1953, Tman, gonzo and 3 others like this.
  19. Gman0046
    Joined: Jul 24, 2005
    Posts: 6,256

    Gman0046
    Member

    My last cam was a Comp Cam XE262H. Great idle lope and pulled well.

    Gary
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2018
    bchctybob, mad mikey and 29StudeDude like this.
  20. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,726

    flynbrian48
    Member

    From what I understand these are small valve heads, not 2.02's. I never had the engine apart, so I'm taking the guys word for what the cam is, but the heads do have the right pointy hump. It runs great, looks great, and was cheap for me to buy from the guy who pulled it out of a '65 Malibu SS to put an LS in.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces and 29StudeDude like this.
  21. 29StudeDude
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 353

    29StudeDude
    Member

    fattboyzz and fastcar1953 like this.
  22. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,752

    bobss396
    Member

    I have the Lunati Voodoo equivalent in my car, some lope but good traffic manners.
     
  23. Aaron65
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 390

    Aaron65
    Member
    from Michigan

    I think you'll like that one...it's probably the oldest grind in the book. I run a similar cam in a Ford 289, and it idles nice and has plenty of vacuum, but is still a couple steps up from a stock cam, at least in engines as small as a 283.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces and 29StudeDude like this.
  24. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,260

    1934coupe
    Member

    Why does anyone claim that a old Duntov or 30-30 cam is what to get when like buffaloracer says a comp cam 268 version is available. Yes the30-30 is a good cam but it is old technology, yes it might still work but the after market cams are better blue printed and have the correct spring pressures for the application. I wish I could find the article by Buddy Morrison he explained it perfectly in using an after market cam.

    Pat
     
    mad mikey and 29StudeDude like this.
  25. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,478

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Pat
    I agree with you on every one of your points but there's something in just being able to rattle off all the old buzzwords from the past (as long as it's fact and not BS).
    Bench racing is what holds the interest in this whole hot rod thing for some of us.
    My L79 engine is full of NOS GM parts including the "151" camshaft, not that I consider myself a purist on any particular level.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, 1934coupe and 2 others like this.
  26. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,994

    Roothawg
    Member

    Personally, I like the regrinds on modern profiles. I used to buy the 300 hp 327 cam for alot of the short stroke engines I ran on the street. A modern twist with similar profiles. That's a good little cam for your 283. You will be happy.
     
  27. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,752

    bobss396
    Member

    How pure is a re-popped Duntov 30-30 cam today? Cam makers put their own spin on them since. Now they probably work a little better than the OG cams did. Chet Herbert used to grind those up for us to use in the stock cars. IIRC, the cam was introduced for the 283 FI and was extremely popular for the time.
     
  28. mad mikey
    Joined: Dec 22, 2013
    Posts: 9,440

    mad mikey
    Member

    Good choice on the cam for the little 283. And you will not have to go to a higher stall on the converter. Its a nice mild cam.
     
    29StudeDude likes this.
  29. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,522

    Fordors
    Member

    The ‘097 cam (the Duntov grind) came out in ‘57 and served into the 327 era in the 340 and 360 horse Corvette engines. It was the 365 and 375 327’s that used the 30/30 cam and when the Z28 came out that was the cam it used.
     
    29StudeDude and bowie like this.
  30. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,396

    sunbeam
    Member

    I second the 097 I never liked the clatter of .030 valve lash. Back in the day to 097 got a bad rap because people changed the cam and left the old tired valve springs. By the time the cam was working the springs were giving up. The max torque rating went from 3000 rpm to 4200.
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2018
    Nailhead Jason likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.