Register now to get rid of these ads!

32 frame newly arrived, is this correct??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by wex65, Jun 4, 2013.

  1. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,142

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    So my 32 frame arrived this afternoon and I got something of a surprise.

    I had already ordered a sub rail kit from Steadfast Mfg to allow my 30 body to sit on the frame but the frame is TOTALLY flat at the rear. I was expecting a rise/curve at the rear....

    Am I missing something??!

    Oh, and the frame was ordered as 'pinched and bobbed for a 31/31 body'. The guy is telling me the only way a Model A body will fit on the frame is to cut and narrow the rear. I haven't seen this before. I was expecting it to have a small cut out for the axle under the rear frame.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,588

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    No,the set it up for a model A body,,,your good to go. HRP
     
  3. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,142

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    Thanks HRP. I know you are likely shaking your head at these FNG questions but my blood pressure hhas been pretty high the last 30 mins!

    So the sub rail kit will work on this setup, great.

    Looks like I start building a car this weekend!!!
     
  4. Fenders
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 3,921

    Fenders
    Member

    Did you order a subrail kit for a model A to sit on a 32 frame?
    But the frame is already set up for a model A............
     
  5. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,142

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    FACEPLANT...

    Is it too late to take the 5th?! :eek:
     
  6. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,546

    alchemy
    Member

    Looks like that frame will use a stock A body with no subrail mods. You probably now own an extra subrail adapter kit.
     
  7. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    That thing is going to sit eight miles high in the rear though..
     
  8. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    ...thats what I was thinking!
     
  9. I can tell you a couple things...

    1) You shouldn't have to cut the sub rails out in the rear.
    2) The back end is going to be VERY HIGH and if you mount the A spring on top of the rear axle... it's going to be VERY VERY VERY high in the back.
    3) You will NOT need the rear sub rail kit you bought. If you can't return it, PM me, I know a guy who needs one.

    The best thing to do it mock up your suspension and see how it sits.

    You'll need some rear body mounts on that frame too... it helps to adjust the doors.

    Sam
     
  10. Also... why is it so narrow? Looks like a Pro-Street chassis for big ol' Mickey Thompsons!

    Sam
     
  11. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Where's the kick up in the rear? I know little about Model A's or 32's, but doesn't the frame need a kick up to keep the ass end low?
     
  12. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,284

    F&J
    Member

    I'm pretty sure the jog inwards is for the narrower A wheel wells.

    I never liked the look of the rails ending like that in front of the tubs. I much rather cut the heck out of the A subrails and trunk floor to use a 32 style frame.
     
  13. basicbob
    Joined: Nov 2, 2003
    Posts: 968

    basicbob
    Member

    WEX65, who actually built your frame? Did you order a pro street frame or was it just something they had left over?

    Others are correct saying it will sit high.

    Thanks Bob
     
  14. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,171

    Mark T
    Member

    Yup, that jog inwards is to fit inside the stock Model A subrails without having to modify them, you now have a subrail kit that you don't need. This frame will save you a lot of work on the subrails.

    Use a Model T spring to bring the ass end down, it will bolt into the Model A crossmember. Reversing the eyes on the Model T spring will bring it down even more.

    You could cut out that Model A crossmember and move it up a few inches and weld it back in, that will lower the ass down a few inches.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2013
  15. J scow
    Joined: Mar 3, 2010
    Posts: 487

    J scow
    Member
    from Seattle

    First of all what look are you going for? It only takes about an hour to mock up the suspension and body to see if it will give you the look you want. Also I would call the frame shop and ask about their exchange policy. Though problems like this can be heartbreaking (I kinda wana cry for you). Just keep in mind there are no problems you cant overcome with Hot Rods. Just take a deep breath and work it out. We are here to help.:) And maybe rib you a little along the way;)... Now mock it up and show us some pics. We'll keep you between the navigational beacons.
     
  16. Wow, model a bodies are flat and deuce bodies swoop up at the rear.

    I don't get that blunt cut, on the deuce rails just ahead of the wheel wells. If you have a flat frame you might as well contour the rails to the body without stepping them in. Either way, modifying an A body is always easier and is gonna look better than this.

    Who built this thing???
     
  17. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Frame is still flat no matter where or what spring you mount.

    Flat A frames are almost universially Zee'd out back and its very common to "C" 32 frames to get the car lower...and OEM design for a 32 frame is far from flat!
    This could be a tangle for the OP so he needs to figure out what he's doing ASAP.
    Do a quick mock-up to see where you're at and if you like the stance!
     
  18. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    The blunt cut "pro street" lookin' thing is the same thing they do with the chassis Brookville roadster sells. I too am not a fan of that style. This chassis design will save you having to cut out the subrails and such, so the kit you bought you won't need as stated above. This is not the way I would handle this sort of deal, but as others have said, mock it all up and see where stuff lands and see if you like it. I can't se that rear end coming down to a level that I would consider acceptable.

    Just looking at the picture again before I hit "submit", one possibility I see would be to move the Model A type cross member forward, the run an early Ford rear or the appropriate Pete & Jakes cross spring brackets on a Nine inch or what ever turned around forward of the axle. This would place the spring in front of the suspension and give you at least a fighting chance of getting a realistic ride height. Just my .02...
     
  19. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Another quick thought, did the frame builder provide a photograph of what his frame looks like under a mocked up or finished car? I'm looking and it looks like the X-member is pushed way back in the frame as well.
     
  20. Fuzzy Knight
    Joined: Jun 8, 2009
    Posts: 11,806

    Fuzzy Knight
    Member
    from Santee, Ca

    Trust me that is the way you want it!! Just cut it off and raise it about 5 inches and you will be good to go!!
     
  21. couverkid
    Joined: Mar 30, 2007
    Posts: 1,134

    couverkid
    Member

    Is this frame from brookville roadster? I seen in there catalog something like this. I don't get it,will set to high in the back would be my guess. No need for that subrail kit.
     
  22. Chris
    Joined: Jan 5, 2005
    Posts: 14,500

    Chris
    Member

    So the frame is just gonna "end" where it jogs in...it will look that way at any angle unless the rear tire hides it. Sure, this may be easier, but if it were easy, everyone would drive a bitchin hot rod ;)
     
  23. Funny thing about this place,no matter who does a modification to a frame or a body......
    Plenty of the guys here know a "better" way to do the same damn thing=their way......
    It must be why the term pissing contest was coined.
     
  24. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    But the influx of options and ideas is what makes the tech aspect of the HAMB so great. I enjoy getting different ways to do something. It does help.
     
  25. 554coupe
    Joined: Nov 25, 2008
    Posts: 46

    554coupe
    Member
    from Australia

    the distance from the front x member to where the swaige line starts looks too long ? . I have a 32 wheelbase of 106 inches & the distance on my chassis is 29 Inches , measured from the centre of the front crossmember to where the Swaige line starts . did you have it set up for a 32 ford wheelbase or a model A ? . your Cowl should be about an inch back from the start of the swaige & that is where it should be pinched otherwise your cowl will be on top of the rail . ( which is not bad , just personal preferance ) , you need to Narrow the rear over the Axle for the model a wheel arches & that can be Achieved by Pulling the rails in over the rear Axle . This application looks like mini tubs ? Is that what you were after ? . You need to siT your Body on & your Wheel arch will determine Exactly where your rear Axle is going to be . & at first Glance i would say that the rear spring might be mounted behind your Diff . but as other guys have said , Most probably should have been zeed or stepped as it will be high , without Spring mods . All the best .
     
  26. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

  27. Drive'em
    Joined: Jan 7, 2013
    Posts: 274

    Drive'em
    Member

    I take it you're building a hiboy style car. If so,that frame just doesn't look right to me. As said many times it will sit really high in the rear plus you will be able to see the indentation part of the frame from just about any angle. I would return it, if you can, and get a stock style 32 frame and go the body subrail route. Take a look at any hiboy style Model A and you'll see what I mean. Good luck
     
  28. wex65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,142

    wex65
    Member
    from WV

    Wow, a lot to take in here. Thanks for the feedback, it is all appreciated.

    Feeling a little down right now after having waited 3 weeks for this to arrive and realizing immediately it wasn't what I had expected AND, unless someone corrects me, what I had asked for.

    This is the last email I sent the company in relation to the spec. Possibly I screwed up but to me this looks almost NOTHING like the frame in the photo.

    "The rear will be bobbed and include the A rear crossmember. To be crystal clear, it will be like the frame in this post/thread:

    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=104922
    "

    His response was "Yes that one is a little rough but the same idea."

    To answer someone's question above. This was not ordered as a pro street frame or using left over parts. It was purpose built to be the base of a 30 highboy.

    I am trying to come to terms with the frame I have here and the fact it isn't what I expected. Not sure of the way forward here, will sleep on it but not happy.

    The sudden cut and jog is NOTHING like what I was looking for...as subtle as a smack in the face.
     
  29. dano1930
    Joined: Feb 10, 2013
    Posts: 58

    dano1930
    Member

    Could you use "out the back" style spring perches on your rear end? would they work in this situation? (Im actually asking haha) i guess that would alter your wheelbase slightly wouldn't it?
     
  30. 40Standard
    Joined: Jul 30, 2005
    Posts: 5,971

    40Standard
    Member
    from Indy

    I would not be happy with this frame. I would have bought a frame from somebody else.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.