32 Pedal assembly VS 33/34 Pedal assembly

I have two sets of 32.....how much different are the 33/4's".....in the context of converting them to work a hydralic master cylinder- like Vern Tardel's book....

 

Conversion process would be the same...but scope out Klazurfer's Method first on a '32!
'33-4 (there are several variants) are very much like '32, as forward X is shallower than '35-48 and angle is much like '32. They nearly fit a '32 frame, with one bolt hole actually aligning--the vehicle I checked this on didn't have anything else on it, but I suspect with some corrective bending they could be used on s deuce.
On a '33-4 frame, I don't think there's a convenient MC location like on a '32, and a much more elaborate bracket will be neeeded.

 

now that i thnk about it, 32's don't have any bends in teh pedal arms, right...they are straight......(i don't have mine to look at here)

 

Yes, 32 pedals have some bends. But not as much as 33-4's.

 

want to sell one set of 32 pedals?
thanks

 

i should have worded that a little differently.....one set is in my hot rod and the other will probably go in to another hot rod....

thanks for the offer.....never hurts to ask

 

A friends 33.

Built about 25 years ago.

 

True statement - when working on my '34, I abandoned any idea of fabbing a direct-action brake setup. So used the original mechanical gang-lever ***embly to actuate a M/C mounted further to the rear.

This was, in large, dictated by the crossmember design on the '34.

EDIT: If I were building a frame from scratch, I would probably be inclined to use an F1/F100 pedal setup - I like the way they bolt up to the crossmember...

 

Someone posted a pic on here of a '34 frame with what I think was an Ansen bracket, from the commercial 1950's bolt-in conversion kit...wish I could find that picture. It was clearly a sort of bridge between two frame members.