Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical '32 tie rod, over or under wishbone?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by dwollam, Jan 29, 2022.

  1. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I got my new axle today! That's the good news. Bad news is it has the same exact drop as my old axle, just 2" narrower. The new axle is a nice looking unit!

    I can only think these CE dropped arms just are not low enough. Since they are forged steel I can heat and drop them I guess but I was under the impression they were intended for a 4" drop axle with a wishbone, but no way.

    I don't have any problems owning another axle. It will find a home somewhere. I just gotta figure this out.

    Dave
     
  2. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,682

    alchemy
    Member

    Each era wishbone has a different height. Going under a 32 wishbone is the hardest as they hang lowest. Going under a 36-40, not as hard. Going under a 42-48 is really easy as they kinda hump up near the axle.

    The arms are not a one size fits every year thing. I bet the CE arms work just fine with a later wishbone. You happen to be using the most difficult wishbones.
     
    Tman and dwollam like this.
  3. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Ok, that makes sense. Maybe I gotta go over it. I'm thinking about it again. :(

    Thanks,
    Dave
     
  4. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,370

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    SoCal deep drop bolt on (bolt through) arms (stainless - don't know is steel is an option) with a SoCal axle and '40 split bones is a bolt in deal with the tie rod under the bones with room to spare and no ground clearance issues.

    Edit - I may have had to ream the steering arms from underneath - can't remember exactly but think that was the case! So not exactly bolt in as I suggested!

    Chris
     
  5. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I don't want to split the wishbone. But thanks.

    Dave
     
  6. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,370

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Mine is split (but mounted inboard of the frame rails) but I don't think that would make any difference if they weren't split.

    Chris
     
  7. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Okay! I found a working solution. I switched to some '40 spindles and the '32 tie rod NEARLY fit. I will heat and bend the stock '40 arms up maybe a half inch and the rod will clear. I also modified the Model A crossmember so there is not much chance of it hitting and I think I retained the strength as well. Got the top 6 rivets installed and ground flat too. Side and bottom rivets will come when I take the body back off and flip the frame over. I ground the right spindle top to clear the Lincoln brakes and still need to do the left. Also gotta install new king pin bushings and get those reamed. Here are some before and after pics of the crossmember and the tie rod etc.

    Thanks for all the help guys!

    Dave

    Before: Tie rod way under crossmember when turned.

    20220129_121104.jpg 20220129_120401.jpg 20220129_121130.jpg

    After: Lots of clearance to crossmember now!

    20220204_183319.jpg 20220204_183338.jpg 20220204_183348.jpg 20220204_183445.jpg
     
  8. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,782

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    I watch Steadfast MFG from time to time and he really likes the 46-48 bones with 5 inch axles and the super deep drop bolt on arms from Roadster Supply to put the tie rod under the bones. He's done quite a few this way.
     
    dwollam likes this.

  9. When you heat those arms, get them plenty hot before bending. A simple jig helps keep the bends the same. Get yourself a fresh bag of plain clay kitty litter. Take the hot freshly bent arms and bury them in kitty litter. this will allow a slow cool and for the metal to normalize. It may take a few hours before they are cool enough to remove. This way you will not induce stress risers and cracks. Anyways good to have them magnafluxed afterwards to be sure..
     
  10. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Didn't take much bending. Just up a little ways, then drop the tie rod eyes down a bit. All cleaned up and loosely bolted back on so it will roll outside and strip it all back down again so I can finish the rivets and welding and strip the frame to bare metal. I can just slip my index finger in between the tie rod and wishbone on each side. 20220205_201211.jpg 20220205_201220.jpg 20220205_201235.jpg

    Dave
     
    C69A and kadillackid like this.
  11. AULIZ
    Joined: Oct 28, 2005
    Posts: 1,779

    AULIZ
    Member

    Looks very good !
    a
     
    dwollam likes this.
  12. NoRust
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 149

    NoRust
    Member

    Nice.
     
    dwollam likes this.
  13. Have you checked your clearances with the ch***is loaded with weight (i.e. ride height)?...and then take into account the full range of suspension travel to make sure your next issue isn't the tie rod hitting the bottom of the frame.
     
    Andy and Moriarity like this.
  14. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,792

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yeah, pretty much. Had the car mostly together including engine and trans, etc. Tie rod is in stock 1932 location with the exception on a 1" lower Model A crossmember and maybe a little less arched front spring. Stock '32 wishbone. It's mostly just the bottom of the axle and car that is lower because of the drop axle. Spring is not reverse eyes. I'll even raise it a bit if needed, not going to be a road grader anyway!

    Dave
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.