Register now to get rid of these ads!

351 Cleveland.....????

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ModelAMafia, Nov 11, 2008.

  1. I don't know why all you guys keep saying it's heavy. It only looks that way. Here are some real world comparison numbers:
    351C 550 LBS
    351W 525 LBS
    350 Chevy 575 LBS
    409 Chevy 685 LBS
    454 Chevy 685 LBS
    360 Mopar 560 LBS
    440 Mopar 670 LBS

    Now for the real porkers - Allison V12=1160 LBS and the Merlin is a whopping 1540 LBS
    for the light weights, 302 Ford = 460LBS and the champ is the 215 Aluminum Buick at 315!

    So the Cleveland is not overweight pig by any means!
     
  2. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    That and the Shelbys never got 351C.

    Gotcha. Beautiful car, BTW. Context was lost from post #4 to now though, so an appropriate caption would've helped! :D
    Oh yeah, even '70 Shelbys used the 351W because they were all really left over '69s! :eek:

    No, but the 351M is (flame suit donned)
     
  3. The 351M/400M weigh 575 so still right there with the over rated SBC!
     
  4. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Yes, but it is a pig with a reputation for throwing rods (that's what the flame suit was for!) :D <-- see, smiley = tongue-in-cheek
     
  5. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member

    Over rated?

    Is that why stroker sbc's practically dominate the local street drags?

    Because they're so over rated?

    That makes tons of sense.
     
  6. They dominate because there so cheap to build and easy to get the go fast parts for. You can make more horsepower with a Ford 302/351 but it will cost you more money.
    Well worth it I think, its about the same over here top build a serious 351 as 350, there are some monster 302 and 351 based cars running in the street dargs, some stroked and punched out up to 475ci!
     
  7. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,653

    tjm73
    Member

    They also have a huge following because Chevy was good about having decent factory heads and making good power in stock form. Ford engines have always been saddled with sub-par heads. Any Ford engine of equal displacement to a Chevy engine will match or beat a Chevy of similar size.

    It has nothing to do with brand and everything to do with airflow. In many instances the Ford engines seem to have mechanicall advantages in power production. In othere's Chevy has the advantage.

    But in the early days, Chevy had the advantage fromthe factory and they have built a loyal following from that.
     
  8. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member

    I agree with both of you.

    I just think that any engine that can be built as cheaply as an sbc, and run as hard as a stacked sbc, and pretty much dominate the street drags can hardly be considered "over rated". There's a reason they're so common - and it isn't because they suck.
     
  9. JRRoberts
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 189

    JRRoberts
    Member
    from Madison WI

    Over rated, cheap or not...... I am pretty sure this thread was about the FORD Cleveland
     
  10. Never said they suck. I said they were over rated because so many seem to think they are the greastest V8 ever built. They are not. They are a great way to make cheap horsepower for sure and they certainly have a loyal following and there is nothing wrong with that, it's just that they are not the greastest thing since sliced bread that many seem to think. Not knocking them, just the folks that can't see past the alter of the bow tie.

    I'll take a 351C over a 350SBC any day. And as Dan Gurney once said "the small block Ford is the best V8 ever, just needs some cylinder heads" :eek:

    "Dominate the street drags"? Naw, 5.0 Mustangs have taken over that spot :D
     
  11. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member


    Yeah, I suppose you're right on that one.
     
  12. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

  13. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

    Yep and thats why DG put in on their ass in the TRANS AM series with that BOSS 302 :D
     
  14. And then there was this!
    [​IMG]
     
  15. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA


    Thanks I just got wood at work......:eek:
     
  16. The Hop Walla
    Joined: Aug 19, 2007
    Posts: 427

    The Hop Walla
    Member
    from Dallas

    351 Cleveland was THE hot mill when I was in high school (70s). They were plenty fast.

    dka
     
  17. I think this has just inspired me! I have a blown and injected Cleveland that was in the Anglia sitting in the garage wondering what to do with it. I'm thinking it might have to fall between the rails of the 32 coupe. What do you guys think?
     
  18. elcornus
    Joined: Apr 8, 2005
    Posts: 652

    elcornus
    Member

    DO IT!!!!!!

    I LOVE CLEVELANDS!!!!!

    Here's mine, WC T-5 and a locked 4:11'ed 9" going into a '27 Dodge sedan

    [​IMG]

    Long live the cleveland!!!!
     
  19. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

    You could always send it down here to SOCAL...a certain 37 needs a power plant...I'd treat it right...promise not to break it. :rolleyes:
     
  20. stealthcruiser
    Joined: Dec 24, 2002
    Posts: 3,750

    stealthcruiser
    Member

    You won't do it!
     
  21. Is that a challenge?
     
  22. thall
    Joined: Jul 12, 2008
    Posts: 67

    thall
    Member
    from nc

    were the timing sets from the factory in these 'retarded' a bit for emissions??

    I seem to recall that was one 'good' performance improvement....
    never checked it out though...

    I pulled one from a 44k mile torino wagon in 78 or so and never used it... it is around somewhere...
     
  23. Chevy's NASCAR motor has the distributor up front. But who the hell knows what kind of motor it is. A bunch of those 400M's wound up in airboats. For awhile that was the thing to have down in the Everglades.
     
  24. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,695

    Weasel
    Member

    I call fake - looks like a Windsor to me - the Cleveland has the timing chain cover cast as part of the block. The Cleveland fuel pump mounts to this casting - not to the bolt on timing chain cover shown in your photo.

    Here's a couple more shots of the genuine XE Australian Cleveland block with Gurney Weslake heads. Waterpump is the Snow White shorty conversion, bolted to the cast with the block Cleveland timing chain cover.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  25. vicious
    Joined: Mar 17, 2008
    Posts: 25

    vicious
    Member

    had a C in my 71 mustang

    was a dog until about 3.5 to 4K

    4K to 6K was a totally different car

    the few times i turned it faster than 6K i about had to have the seat surgically removed
     
  26. Not a fake anything - real life Gurney Eagle 302 - didn't claim it to be a Cleveland, just a Bad Ass Ford
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2008
  27. spiffy1937
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 733

    spiffy1937
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Florida

    One of the best running street engines I ever had was a 351C with the 2 barrel heads and an aluminum 4 barrel intake. The thing pulled hard all through the RPM's. I don't think they are ugly with the proper valve covers, etc just like any engine.
    Pretty sure this is a 351C in this '32, sure don't look bad.
     

    Attached Files:

  28. JRRoberts
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 189

    JRRoberts
    Member
    from Madison WI

    I actually really like the way that Clevelands look, especially when they have the flat valve covers.
     
  29. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Wow - I've been out of the airboat scene for at least 10 years now, but in the '70s, 80s, & 90s - if you weren't running a no-shit aircraft engine, you ran Cadillac and Big Blocks. Seen a 500" Caddy swing a 76x76 prop in a glass hull!!

    Of course, this was before you had to run the exhaust out through the lower portion of the cage and all the other namby-pamby rules they've got now...
     
  30. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,695

    Weasel
    Member

    I thought this thread was about Cleveland engines.

    BTW read the valve covers - it's W-E-S-L-A-K-E there is no T in Weslake.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.