Register now to get rid of these ads!

351 vWindsor Heads

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lex, Mar 15, 2011.

  1. Lex
    Joined: Nov 14, 2009
    Posts: 21

    Lex
    Member

    Hi, I'm in the process of building a 351 Windsor for my car. The heads I have for it are E7's and I'm told that they are restrictive especially through the exhaust. I don't have a pile of money to spend on aluminum heads and I am looking for suggestions as to what else would work better for me . I am going to use a mild cam and a Edelbrock performer intake with a 650 single pumper Edelbrock carb and a set of shorty mustang headers. if there are any other Ford heads that would be more suitable, I would appreciate the help . I am not going to be racing or rodding the crap out of it, I just want a motor that sounds nice and has enough power to throw me back in the seat a bit ...Thanks
     
  2. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,487

    Pir8Darryl
    Member

    I have seen posts here on the HAMB that say the 5.0 heads out of an explorer are iron GT-40 heads. Maybe someone will chime in to confirm this.
     
  3. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    96-97 1/2 Explorer with the F3ZE casting number (same as 03 Cobra), some may be marked F1ZE as well. All will have GT and three slash marks on the end
    GT40P heads are on late 97 -98 Explorer and flow more but take different headers due to spark plug relocation. these will have GT and FOUR slash marks

    New GT aluminum are available at about $1060.00 a set.
     
  4. rebelrat
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 448

    rebelrat
    Member

    Not to hijack this thread but will these heads fit Any 351w, I was under the impression that the 5.0 stuff was not interchangeable with 351w
     
  5. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    from Ford:
    Designed for Ford 289-351W engines, the complete assemblies have 60cc combustion chambers, 1.84 in. intake/1.46 in. exhaust valves, and work with stock or aftermarket intakes, rockers, and valve covers.
     
  6. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,600

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    E7's aren't bad for a stock head on a basically stock 302 or 351w. They can handle some bolt ons like a mild cam, dual plane intake, headers, but if you're getting a more radical cam, single plane intake, and internal goodies, you'd be better off with a less restrictive head. E7's are from 87-93 Mustang 5.0 HO engines.

    Late 90's Explorer 5.0's had GT40P Iron Heads...basically an iron version of Fords GT40 Heads.

    To put any 5.0 heads on a 351w, you have to drill out the head bolt holes in the heads or get stepped head bolts because the 351w has larger head bolts than the 302. Easy to do. Other than that, they bolt right on the 351w. Certain headers will clear the GT40P spark plug locations, depends on the application really. GT40P heads are the best stock heads for the money. Either that or find some older 351w D0OE heads and have them updated with hardened seats.

    The next step up over GT40P, GT40, or D0OE heads is aftermarket aluminum like Trick Flow, Air Flow Research, Canfield, etc. If you're shopping for aluminum heads, just don't go with the "Pro Form" heads...heard lots of bad things about them.
     
  7. rebelrat
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 448

    rebelrat
    Member

    Then I will be looking for some of those and thanks for the info
     
  8. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    The difference is 289-302 & 5.0's use 7/16" head bolts ,351W use 1/2" head bolts if you use 351W heads on the 289-5.0's there are spacers available.Aftermarket heads will almost always require the spacers on a 289-5.0.'69-70 351W heads with a mild valve job would be better than the E7's.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2011
  9. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    You can get the stepped head bolts from Edelbrock or ARP instead of using spacers.
     
  10. tedley
    Joined: Nov 8, 2009
    Posts: 2,147

    tedley
    Member
    from canada

    Early 1969 4v 351w had small cc chambers. Something like 61 cc. 290 HP with flat tops. 1970 small chamber heads where slightly larger but still good. I have a set of 70. All the rest are open chamber. Getting hard to find thou.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. jamn47
    Joined: Jan 3, 2011
    Posts: 135

    jamn47
    Member

    Those E7's should work fine for your application. I've ported a few of them myself. I would use a 351w exhaust gasket and then scribe it and port out to the line. follow the porting back into the valve pocket area. Remember you don't have to go crazy, just clean it up. On the cam you could increase the lift and duration of the exhaust, to compensate for the small exhaust valves/ports. Remember from 87-93, these heads were used on stock 5.0 H.O. engines in the mustangs of which I've owned several over the years. In stock form they would smoke most factory street cars.
     
  12. Henry Floored
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 1,370

    Henry Floored
    Member

    OK, you don't really need special headbolts for this swap since those heads are located by dowels at each end of the cyl heads. To use 5.0/302 heads on a 351W (like the GT40, GT40P heads) you simply need to drill them for 1/2" head bolts. No machine shop needed just a good hand drill.
     
  13. metalshapes
    Joined: Nov 18, 2002
    Posts: 11,130

    metalshapes
    Member

    Can somebody tell me what I have here?

    I picked these up at a swapmeet, and hopefully I can make them work on my 351W.

    Valves are 1.94 and 1.60.

    And they have had some work done to the ports.
    ( specially the exhausts look a lot better than stock)

    I'm mostly concerned about the compression ratio..

    ( I know that can be measured, but maybe the specs are in a list somewhere...)

    Thanks.

    12A 047.jpg

    12A 048.jpg

    12A 049.jpg

    12A 050.jpg

    12A 051.jpg

    12A 052.jpg

    12A 053.jpg

    12A 055.jpg

    12A 056.jpg
     
  14. smokey3550
    Joined: Oct 30, 2008
    Posts: 91

    smokey3550
    Member
    from texas

    Those are a set of old 289 heads. You should have hrdened exaust seats installed if it has'nt been done allready. Those heads are an excellent choice for a 351. The small chambers have great quench and the ports flow as well or better (with porting and bigger valves)than gt-40's. I would stick with the factory dished pistons or your combustion will be too high ( 10.5 to 11 to 1)
     
  15. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Sorry,no cigar! look at the 3rd pic down notice the casting code E7 and in other pics the 302 stamping.The 289 heads from the 60's are stamped 289 and have the codes also,click on this www.mre-books.com/interchange/interchange5.html see a big difference in the shape of the combustion chamber? what He has are E7 heads with 1.94 & 1.6 Chevy valves and the screw in studs and guideplates that have been added,this was common practice until the aftermarket started cranking out Ford heads that flow for prices comparable to the SBC's.
     
  16. Lex
    Joined: Nov 14, 2009
    Posts: 21

    Lex
    Member

    If i decide to use the E7 heads, they have huge humps in the exhaust ports, how far down can I grind them and is it worth the effort to do this ? Thanks
     
  17. duste01
    Joined: Nov 5, 2006
    Posts: 1,209

    duste01
    Member

    When I took my '71 Torino motor into the machine shop, the guy that did the work, instead of changing the seat, he changed the angle and used 2.02 valves insead. So far it has worked out very well.
     
  18. Lex
    Joined: Nov 14, 2009
    Posts: 21

    Lex
    Member

    Has anyone any advice on grinding these ports ?
     
  19. Engine man
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,480

    Engine man
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    They may be like that for a reason.
     
  20. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member


    1996 Explorer 5.0 had the regular GT40`s.

    Late 1996 and 1997-up had the GT40P`s.

    1st-gen Lightning and 1993-1995 Cobra had GT40`s,the Lightning heads already have the correct size holes for a 351w.
     
  21. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member

    Yeah,grind them down smooth. Simple.
     
  22. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member

    Hate to burst your bubble,but that E and 7 are not the casting numbers that mean what you think they mean. Look at the next picture and you can clearly see what looks like C6OE or C8OE. If C8OE they would be 4-barrel 1968 302 heads.

    The E7 your thinking of is the E7TE heads used on the 1987-1993 Mustang.
     
  23. FoMoCoPower
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 2,493

    FoMoCoPower
    Member



    Look to see if the casting # is C6OE or C8OE. It looks more like C8OE to me,which I believe means that they are 1968 4-barrel 302 heads.
     
  24. metalshapes
    Joined: Nov 18, 2002
    Posts: 11,130

    metalshapes
    Member

    The cast in number on those heads is C9OE.
     
  25. mjlangley
    Joined: Dec 11, 2008
    Posts: 196

    mjlangley
    Member
    from SE MI

    After 1974, the only difference between most 302's and 351W's was the headbolt size. The early (69 and 70) 351W had larger ports and valves as has already been stated. These or a set of Explorer GT40's would be a nice, relatively low cost option for a SBF. Just watch out for the GT40P heads, the spark plug angle is slightly different and can put plug wires really close to header tubes unless 'P' specific headers are used.
     
  26. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    My opinions range more to the pragmatic than to traditional when it comes to stuff that works better for the same or only a little more money, especially when a coat of paint hides your transgreesion to most observers.
    The point being you can buy aluminum heads with far better port design, and optimum budget friendly valve size, for the cost of the used iron heads and the parts and quality machine work to meet your needs.
    Me, I was proud of owning a set of aluminum heads, and although I didn't polish them, I did use chemicals used to brighten the aluminum bodies on 18 wheelers to insure the aluminum was bright.They had one season of once in awhile drag racing on them and I couldn't have bought a "good number" used heads and had the work done and come out much cheaper.
    Probably about the same cost and effort as to paint Ford Blue or on occasion with me, Chevy Orange!
    Dave
     
  27. Lex
    Joined: Nov 14, 2009
    Posts: 21

    Lex
    Member

    hate being anal but i don't want to screw this up so just for clarification, I can grind the hump out of the exhaust port FoMoCoPower ? I don't want to grind a hole in them, and secondly, if I do gring this hump out, is it going to make much difference ? I'm not planning on racing this but i do want it to have some ppower to show off ocassionally..Thanks
     
  28. Nick Flores
    Joined: Aug 13, 2009
    Posts: 1,358

    Nick Flores
    Member

    I just spent some time on my D0OE ports and all I did was clean up a bit of rough casting and shined 'em up a bit with a few rolls on the die grinder. If you're talking about the hump where the valve runs through, I was always told not to cut that down.

    I'll add.. There is a great thread in the tech archives covering port and polish job on SBF heads but no pics. I contacted the OP and it was an old thread so no luck on getting those pics back, but its one of the better reads I found online concerning these heads.
     
  29. Lex
    Joined: Nov 14, 2009
    Posts: 21

    Lex
    Member

    Thanks Nick, I think that's what I'll do, just shine them up a bit and make sure they match up to the exhaust gaskets and headers and call it good enough, What's your band all about, what genre do you play?
     
  30. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,487

    Pir8Darryl
    Member

    Does anyone have flow numbers for non ported garden variety heads?
    How much do you really gain by going with a set of GT-40 iron heads over a basic set of 302's or 351's?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.