Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured Hot Rods 354 Hemi vs SBC

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by j0ebeer, Mar 2, 2026.

  1. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 4,349

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Stock Hemi not that expensive stock parts , Aftermarket $$$ unless years of searching for deal on Vintage speed parts ,
    The Reality is Hemi only eye candy
    unless High compression & Rpms
    In a No power adder only
    Naturally Aspirated use / form.

    Hemi on Alky, Nitro , Nos, Blower,turbo
    Different story ..
    Jenkins killed the Hemi dynasty
    With SBC around 1972 ish Pro Stock ,
    MOPAR made come back in 90's
    Only because Hidden Nitrous witch most top 5 of the Bands where doing , Just the 2 team MOPAR's where better in there tunning with.

    Let move forward to modern time when
    NHRA Pro Stock went to Efi with
    Max Rpm restriction Rule ,
    This is why MOPAR pulled out
    MOPAR needed more R's to be compe***ive
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2026 at 2:46 PM
    427 sleeper and 57 Fargo like this.
  2. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,462

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

  3. swade41
    Joined: Apr 6, 2004
    Posts: 14,621

    swade41
    Member
    from Buffalo,NY

    I'm a chevy guy but since it's your money to spend I voted for the hemi, can't argue that the hemi outshines the chevy in the looks department.
    I would cut the the hood sides just enough for the valve cover to poke through, to me that looks better and more aggressive than the blister.
     
    HemiDeuce likes this.
  4. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,091

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    tomcat11, 05snopro440 and 51 mercules like this.
  5. Henry Floored
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 1,372

    Henry Floored
    Member

    Do something crazy and different. Stick a Ford in that Ford of yours. No one will see it coming. It will blow people’s minds.
     
    Budget36 and FinnishFireball like this.
  6. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,462

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

    I'm confused, are you saying a Hemi will not work based on what?
     
  7. T. Turtle
    Joined: May 20, 2018
    Posts: 690

    T. Turtle

    ^This. I tend to Fordism but you cannot argue with the logic.

    Adding: I don't know what the OP does with the car but if it'll be used for cross-country, long trips it's a no-brainer. Plus there's the budget.
     
    05snopro440 likes this.
  8. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,462

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

    I guess I missed the part of a budget. I live in a small town of 50,000 and I bet I can drive through all the alleys and side streets and see at least 100 dead Chevy's with gr*** growing up the wheels and sides of the cars/trucks. Bet I can't find one Mopar with a Hemi in it. Maybe the push rods and rocker arms got delayed or sent to the desert by mistake.
     
  9. T. Turtle
    Joined: May 20, 2018
    Posts: 690

    T. Turtle

    Not sure what your point is. Of course you see more chevs. There were many millions with SBCs in them built and that's why even I in Europe can reasonably quickly and cheaply get bits for them. With Hemis, not so much, and the budget for building one will need to be far higher. If the owner has it and does not care about any of this, fine. He asked for an opinion and I posted mine lol.
     
    05snopro440 and Budget36 like this.
  10. If the sbc is in place and running, you leave it there and drive the thing. If you want to finish the hemi go ahead, by then you know if the sbc should stay or not.
     
  11. Stan Back
    Joined: Mar 9, 2007
    Posts: 2,800

    Stan Back
    Member
    from California

    You have to remember that the 50's Chrysler, DeSoto and Dodge cars were not always equipped with a Hemi. And none of those brands were a leader in their sales category, so there's not a lot of them around now.

    . . . and it's been about 68 years since any of them were manufactured.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  12. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,091

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Using your logic, I guess that a BMW Isetta must be the most reliable car in the world, because I NEVER see one of them lying in an alley or in someone's yard.
     
    patsurf likes this.
  13. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,462

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

    The logic is that if these Chevy's are so ****ing easy and cheap to get parts for, why are they broke down all over the place? Why don't people fix them with the cheap and easy parts all over the place?
    For your example why don't you use a car that that only made one of and made in Europe?
    They made around 100,000 Hemi's from 1951-1958 and another 10,495 426 Hemi's from 1964-1971.
    How many BMW Isetta's were even imported to the US?
     
  14. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 3,417

    Sharpone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If ya ain’t breaking your car ya ain’t beating it hard enough. Just kidding but I don’t know why you can’t build a HEMI to be reliable. Carry normal wear items in a box in the trunk things like ignition,WP , starter , minor items that may fail on a road trip and not be readily available. Even some of the SBC stuff isn’t as available at parts houses as it used to be. Build and run what trips your trigger!!!
    Dan
     
    Budget36 and 1946caddy like this.
  15. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,091

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    T. Turtle already attempted to explain your flawed logic to you but, apparently, you just want to be argumentative. If you really can't understand why there are more Chevrolets lying around than 70 year old Chrysler hemi cars, then you're not worth anyone's time.
     
  16. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,462

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

    Thank you, from taking the time from looking for the directions on a roll of toilet paper, for the response.
     
  17. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 4,349

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Another option is 1/25th
     
  18. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,784

    patsurf

    ???
     
  19. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,890

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    I think @j0ebeer is still in the men's reading opinions, but been there so long his legs fell asleep and he can't get up:eek:
     
    partsdawg and Sharpone like this.
  20. Wanderlust
    Joined: Oct 27, 2019
    Posts: 1,112

    Wanderlust

    The cage was kicked, the dogs are barking ;)
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  21. 1biggun
    Joined: Nov 13, 2019
    Posts: 972

    1biggun


    I have a Hemi and ill be honest if I ever get in my truck and running im going to baby it a hell lot more than I would a SBC .
    With a SBC im not going to really worry much spinning it to 6000 RPM or more do burn outs , do a track day , beat on it and drive it like a hot rod .
    It's easly replaceable .

    Sure a Hemi can be driven hard and all that but at what cost if and when things go wrong ??
    Blow up your Hemi and its going to be expensive and much harder to repair ot replace vs a SBC that can have a short block replaced pretty damn cheap .
    If most here hurt there Hemi there going to be down a long time maybe a year or more unless they got another Hemi on hand .
    Realistically who can build up a another Hemi in say a year if starting from scratch on any type of limited budget ?

    I beat the **** out of the engine in my 28 Model A PU because I am really not scared of it blowing up and can replace it in a few days if it does and honestly to build a hemi to match my SBC in HP and extra to overcome the weight penalty id be looking at who knows how much ? $10,000 to build one thats going to spin the same RPM and make say 450HP ?

    Unless your rich and can build a serious performance hemi with out concern of breaking it the only reason your putting one in your car is looks . Its the only reason I'm putting one in my 30 A pu build and it will be 95% stock so im looking at maybe 250 HP and a lot more weight so other than looks im not gaining anything and going backward performance wise . It will not be remotely as fun to drive hard .

    A SBC might be boring to see but these days a 450 HP SBC that can go 6500 or more is easy and fairly cheap and 500HP is not that cost prohivative .

    I have never heard of anyone taking a hard run in anything 500 hp spinning 6000 or more as boring especially with a couple hundred pound weight advantage that helps handling and stopping when running hard.

    That all said the Hemi will always draw more attention and demand respect. Its why im also going through everything to get mine in something respectable. Im doing it for the looks and the cool factor .


    MY search for a decent aluminum aftermarket Hemi intake I can afford continues. The last one I found cost more than the entire SBC in my 57 vette LOL.
     
    Sharpone likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.