Register now to get rid of these ads!

37 Packard Trans??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Hellfish, Nov 8, 2005.

  1. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,828

    Hellfish
    Member

    Anyone know anything about them?
    I was reading an old Car Craft from 1958 and there was a 235 powered 54 Chevy that held 6 quarter mile records in Oregon. It had a 37 Packard "floor shift box" I've been looking for a trans for my 261 and had all but settled on a T5, but if a Packard trans is good (and I can find one) I'd rather keep the whole car "period correct"
     
  2. old beet
    Joined: Sep 25, 2002
    Posts: 5,750

    old beet
    Member

    I had one behind a flathead in 1959. A simple flat adapter was used. Flat motor couldn't break it. Might be hard to find today?......OLDBEET
     
  3. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,828

    Hellfish
    Member

    i'll bet! was it a 3 speed? good gearing? I'm building a pretty hot 261

    All I know is that 35-38 had a floor shift.
     
  4. old beet
    Joined: Sep 25, 2002
    Posts: 5,750

    old beet
    Member

    3 speed with tall first gear.........OLDBEET
     
  5. seymour
    Joined: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 5,125

    seymour
    Member
    from PNW

    I have a couple of Packard ******s. They are indeed 3 spd. Mine are all side shifts though, BUT when Packard went to side shift, they are very easy to convert to toploader. I haven't tried it yet, but supposedly you can use a top cover and pieces from an early Ford and make it work.
     
  6. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,828

    Hellfish
    Member

    interesting. do you know what years you have? what year fords?
     
    1952henry likes this.
  7. seymour
    Joined: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 5,125

    seymour
    Member
    from PNW

    I'm not sure what year one is, but one's a '50. I read about the toploader conversion in one of them old magazines, but I don't think it even said which yrs would work, but I'm guessing it was a '39 car or -'38 truck one due to the swan shaped shifter. I haven't even looked into that stuff b/c they're not going in the car I'm working on at the moment.
     
  8. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    The Packard can be converted to floorshift by merely finding another rare and expensive box, '36-38 Packard...The HRM transmission book says the earlier trans had a weak case, hence the swap of top covers.
    When HRM publicized the Packard as a possible LaSalle (already scarce and expensive) replacement way back when they got some sniping in the letters column. If I remember correctly, a reader reported that one gear (The input/clutch gear??) was prone to failure, and some dimensional peculiarity I can't remember made it difficult to adapt the Packard output or U-joint to any other sort of driveshaft.
    Also, if I remember correctly, there were two different sizes of Packard trans, as with Buick.
     
  9. Brock49Ford
    Joined: Aug 20, 2002
    Posts: 519

    Brock49Ford
    Member

    I am going to use a Packard Trans behind a Cadillac motor in my Model A project. I have 2 1937 boxes, one 1937 shift lid, and a complete 1939-up complete side shift trans. I have not ever run of these yet, but so far I like everything I've seen. Best thing is there size, very compact. The gear ratios are almost identical to the Lincoln Zephyr and Cad-LaSalle ratios. I have some literature that states that the Packard gears are actually stouter than the Cad-LaSalle gear. 1936-38 are non synchro 1st gear, but I believe that the the 1940 and up have a 1st gear synchro, very unusual for a 3 speed trans of any era. I have read the weaker case issues as well in early articals. Externally the cases look almost identical, but I have not really paid too much attention yet. Another nice feature is that the Packard had an open drive line, not a torque tube. I need to do some more in depth research but I believe that there is a common conversion U-joint that works on the Packard yoke. The early lid may bolt on a later case, but I know for a fact that the shifter forks are different, which leads me to believe that there are modifications or parts interchanges that need to take place in order to convert a side shifter over to a top shift. I'm sure that you could make a Hurst style 3spd shifter work as well, you would just have to get the length of the arms correct and make sure that the linkage will line up correctly. Just not "period correct" for a 40-50s style car. These were a popular trans to modify and run behind a GMC 6 cyl. I have a tech artical that covers all that is required to put behind a GMC. I am going to be pretty busy in the evenings for the next week, but if I get a chance I'll try and get a few pictures and scans posted if anyone is interested.

    Brock
     
  10. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,673

    Stovebolt
    Member

    I've got one behind the stovebolt six in my A Coupe!!!

    I haven't got a pic of it though, but to put it behind the six was "relatively" easy.

    10mm steel plate will do it, but a better one is a 12mm plate, bored for the Packard bearing retainer, and one side turned down forming a step to suit your bellhousing, provided that your hole is smaller than the packard. Packard is 4 13/16", Chev is 4 11/16".

    The only other thng to do to suit an open tailshaft setup is grind the tabs off the bearing retainer, and maybe machine the thrust race to suit your thrust bearing, otherwise Packard is the same diameter as Ford.

    Ratios are 1st - 2.43
    2nd 1.53
    3rd 1:1

    Strong? - you bet. In a previous life mine was run an a 427 BBF Funny car in the seventies!!!

    I'll email people a copy of the May 1955 Hot Rod Tech article if you want.

    Cheers
     
  11. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,761

    The37Kid
    Member

    I had a Packard trans around here a year ago, hope it is still around, looked awfully small compaired to a Caddy-LaSalle.
     
  12. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,673

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Small but ****** strong!!!
     
  13. oldcarfart
    Joined: Apr 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,436

    oldcarfart
    Member

    and just how many do you want @ $250.00 each? (antiquer going rate)

    I am in Jacksonville, Florida.

    oldcarfart@aol.com


     
  14. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    I have done the floor shift conversion on the side shift using the 37 top. All the old guys I talked to said....It just bolts up.....yes the top will bolt up but THAT'S ONLY THE BEGINING!!!!!!!! I had to bend the forks a bunch and grind a new detent slot in one of the shift rails to get it to work correctly. Once done the trans worked well but shifted slowly. This was an R-12 Packard overdrive trans. Perhaps the prewar conversion is made with less effort but beware and get ready for a lot of work if not!!!!!!

    1937 6 cyl u-joints are smaller than 8 cyl........really

    I had a Packard Hot Rod for 15 years
     
  15. According to the info I've got on these transmission adapters, the Packard ******s all use the same bolt pattern, from '35 to '54. Still have one for a Chrysler or Desoto motor.
    Dan
     
  16. riverrat
    Joined: Feb 9, 2005
    Posts: 309

    riverrat

    i used a sideshift box behind a 235 years ago. put a 37 top shifter on without any mods . worked great.
     
  17. 4-port Riley
    Joined: Oct 20, 2005
    Posts: 303

    4-port Riley
    Member

    Seymor is right. There were 3 trans used behind hi-torque motors, Cad/LaSalle, Buick & Packard. They all were strong and had close ratios with 1st a little tall, somewhat like Zephyrs. The advantage Packard had was they were available with overdrive on them. I happen to have one with OD for sale, $300. jimb@earthlink.net
     
  18. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,673

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Curious...

    Overdrive equals side shift doesn't it?

    Are the rear of these gearboxes the same as the non-overdrive earlier ones?
     
  19. Brock49Ford
    Joined: Aug 20, 2002
    Posts: 519

    Brock49Ford
    Member

    Well I scanned about 8 pages of info from 2 different articals, but I can't get them from a tif file(2.3 + MB) into a jpeg format that is still readable at 83.0 KB which is the max upload size. I'll keep trying to get something. It was good to go back and read some of this though, too bad I can't share.
     
  20. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,673

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Can you email me a copy?
    Cheers
     
  21. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    "Curious...

    Overdrive equals side shift doesn't it?

    Are the rear of these gearboxes the same as the non-overdrive earlier ones?"
    __________________
    If I remember correctly, these are all toploaders, with the side shift junk sticking through cast bungs like on a Ford four speed, and like the Ford, they can be converted to true floor shifts by just removing and plugging the side stuff and bolting on the right lid.
    I was last near one of these things, behind a hemi project, in about 1962, but I'm sure someone will say if I'm wrong.
     
  22. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,828

    Hellfish
    Member

    me too!
     
  23. 4-port Riley
    Joined: Oct 20, 2005
    Posts: 303

    4-port Riley
    Member

    Mark, I tried to e-mail you but it came back, try me at jimb3@earthlink.net
     
  24. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,673

    Stovebolt
    Member

    I've received your second email, and returned it.

    Cheers
     
  25. sodbuster
    Joined: Oct 15, 2001
    Posts: 5,068

    sodbuster
    Member
    from Kansas

    Cool, found the post.

    Bruce, on the HEMI project that you saw in 62', Did it have chrome carbs and was fuel injected? Just curious. I may know where one is at.

    Chris Nelson
    Kansas
     
  26. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    It was a very heavy lump of grease and filth! It's entirely possible there was a carb in there...
     
  27. rottenikken
    Joined: Mar 28, 2004
    Posts: 162

    rottenikken
    Member

    I had one behind a 364 Buick with cam and tri-power;the box was a 48 Packard with overdrive and a 37 top cover.I had to weld on the overdrive kickout pad on the low/reverse shift fork to have the overdrive kick out when selecting reverse.It was a strong box and never gave any trouble with all that power.
     
  28. 286merc
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,793

    286merc
    Member
    from Pelham, NH

    I hope the following will clear up some confusion.

    Packard used 2 different trannies for 35-39.

    One was for the 6 (110 series)and Standard (120 Series) eight; used 35-38 as a floor shift.

    The bigger one was used on the Super 8 (160 Series) and the V12's (180 series). Used 35-38 on the Super 8 and 35-39 on the V12 as floor shifters.

    The 39-54 column shifters were the same for the 6 thru the Super 8. The last 6 was 1947 and the last straight 8's were 1954.

    Back in the 50's the prewar Packards were all over the boneyards including the gas hog 12's. Nobody bothered with the small ****** as it was as weak as the small Buick.
     
  29. Little Wing
    Joined: Nov 25, 2005
    Posts: 7,565

    Little Wing
    Member
    from Northeast

    I have a 47 topload w/OD,,is that still a canidate for the conversion or were to many things changed by 47 ??
     
  30. I have a side shift Packard trans fo sale in the cl***ifieds right now. I hope someone can put it in something cool.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.