Register now to get rid of these ads!

39 steering in a 32 frame??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by brokenspoke, Oct 26, 2005.

  1. brokenspoke
    Joined: Jul 26, 2005
    Posts: 2,988

    brokenspoke
    Member

    I'm currently working on a 32 frame. 4 inch droped axel, stock wish bone 283 sbc, 39 transmission, stock center cross member. I orginally planned on a F100 box, however I found a sweet 39 box( cross steer) with banjo wheel and lock, light switch intact and all working. I have every thing for the F100. I like the 39 best. Any suggestions??Can the 39 column be switched to the F100 box including the light switch and lock??:confused:
     
  2. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]

    This survivor from the 50's uses the complete 39 banjo, column and box. It's mounted like a 39 (farther forward) and uses cross steering as the 39 did.

     
  3. brokenspoke
    Joined: Jul 26, 2005
    Posts: 2,988

    brokenspoke
    Member

    What engine is in it??
     
  4. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,389

    Andy
    Member

    A friend had a 32 roadster with a complete 40 column and shift stuff and box. Ran a 331 Chrysler to a 40 LaSalle
     
  5. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    The 5W had a flatty in it.
     
  6. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    No That car showed up at York one year. It was supposed to be a California hot rod survivor. It had 2005 pricing in 2002 and I don't think it sold. It was a typical 50's hot rod...solid but cobby around the edges. The complete 39 steering column including the 39 column drop was interesting to me.
     
  7. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    No sorry I don't
     
  8. brokenspoke
    Joined: Jul 26, 2005
    Posts: 2,988

    brokenspoke
    Member

    I really like the 39 steering with the lock in the column drop..I think i;ll at least try it.
     
  9. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,680

    alchemy
    Member

    F-100 shafts are hollow aren't they?

    The outer column housing could be removed from the '39 and slipped onto the F-100, but the length would be all wrong. Just cut the housing tube at the bottom to the correct length. But the horn/switch rod will be harder to cut and re-connect. I think attaching the switch housing to the bottom of the box may require a homemade flange and holder (replacement for the wire bail).

    You will probably need to shorten the shaft on the F-100 box anyway. Have a machinist shorten the end and put the correct taper and keyway on it at the same time to adapt the banjo wheel.

    The shaft lock is just a hole into the shaft. Carefull measurement of the '39 shaft and transfer of those to the F-100 should be easy to do.

    On the '32 I just did I used a '48ish F-1 box and a '34 horn ****on and rod. I didn't hook up the switch mechanism, but I did use the rod and horn wire. I cut the bottom 8" off the rod and now it just turns inside the shaft. My horn wire goes out the stock F-1 bottom-of-the-box plate. My F-1 shaft was shortened about 4".
     
  10. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    I really like the idea of the complete original '39 installation. That is a good box, MUCH slicker than the early stuff but still reasonably fast ratio.
    A third path is available, too: Some have shortened the late box and mounted it sideways as a drag link system. This puts the pitman arm pointing UP, often a good thing with a dropped front.
     
  11. Excatman
    Joined: Oct 24, 2005
    Posts: 17

    Excatman
    Member

    Sorry to steal this tread but I'm wondering something on the same line. I have a 38 column and like the column lock and plan to retain the column drop switch and push ****on start but I'm going to a rack and pinion so I don't have a way of running the horn out the end of the box like usual. Anybody ever retroed a newer horn setup into an old column to retain the horn function?
     
  12. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]

    A piss poor picture of my F-100 modified box for the 39 column keeping the lock system.

    There was a guy at the LA roadster show several years ago that modified the F-100 box for use in stock 32-34 Fords including the early H/L switch and horn ****on. An upgraded steering that kept the original look and function.
     
  13. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,680

    alchemy
    Member

    A couple reasons why I used the F-1 instead of the F-100 (I had both in the shed to choose from).

    1. The F-1 will give you more clearance around the back end of a flatty in a '32 frame (and probably a SBC too).

    2. The F-1 has the same diameter sector as a '32 so you can easily cut and switch the mounting casting ala Tardel. No need to cut the frame at all.

    3. The F-1 has the same pitman arm as early Fords, so anything from '32 to '48 will bolt up. The F-100 is big and ugly.

    4. The F-1 has a slim and trim column, not the large bell like an F-100 (but moot point if you're switching to a '39 column).

    5. The guts of an F-1 are the same as '40 to '48 p***enger cars, and maybe '39's too. F-100 parts are F-100 only.


    The only bad thing about the F-1 box is the lower column will reduce your foot room slightly.
     
  14. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    '37-48 Ford boxes are all the same, varying only in length of steering shaft and pitman arm. All Ford columns '32-48 plus F1 are same diameter, and lock widget on the actual shaft can be moved to suit whatever lock location you end up with. I think F1 shaft is same diameter, so could take early lock easily. Pitman arm interchageability is HUGE--that seems to have been a standard spline and size used by most or all USA makers and even some godless foreigners up into modern times on non-power steerings. Any arm you see in the junkyard that looks like it's that size probably is!
     
  15. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    I talked with a guy that did it with a complicated set up consisting of rings and wiper contacts at the base of the tube. Same theory as the spring loaded horn ****on contact in a late model steering wheel. Too complicated for me.

    I shortened the horn rod and squeezed it into an egg shape so that it was a snug fit in the shaft hole strictly for looks, but still removable. A hidden horn ****on behind the dash lower edge will have to suffice for me.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.