Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 390 cfm holley double pumper for street use

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by KKrod, May 20, 2022.

  1. KKrod
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 1,458

    KKrod
    Member

    I am deciding between 2 Holley 390 cfm carburetors to use on my 265 sbc. 1956 model. It is a single carb intake.

    The single pumper has one fuel inlet, manual choke, and vacuum secondaries. It is said to be much more of a street use carb.

    The double pumper has no choke and has mechanical secondaries. It also is a lot more adjustable. I live in North Texas which has a moderate to hot climate.

    I prefer the mechanical secondaries on the double pumper. And I prefer the appearance. Just wondering if anyone has run the 390 race double pumper on the street. I am currently running 3 Holley deuces. Going to a single four barrel for simplicity and I am tired of the trips look on my car. So thinking simplest may be best.

    Any input would be appreciated. Thanks.
     
  2. One thing for sure, you will get a lot of advice on this question.

    Since "you like the look" of the dbl pumper, go for it. I think you have already decided.

    If the carburetors both have the same throttle body, you could swap out those and have the choke feature. I think. You can also buy parts to convert manual to electric choke if you like.
     
    Deuces and Just Gary like this.
  3. What vehicle?
    What will you use it for?
    What's your tolerance level?

    The single pumper will have better street manners, unless it's in a really light weight car like a T-bucket. Also, I bet the double pumper will be temperamental in winter with no choke.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2022
    The Magic Ratchet, iagsxr and Deuces like this.
  4. If you already have the 390's, you have really narrowed down your choices. If you don't, you might look at an AFB from a 327 Corvette. Gene.
     
  5. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,393

    indyjps
    Member

    If you can tune the hell out of a Holley either will do what you want, The 390 double pumper is basically a restriction carb for class racing, restrict the carb body bore size but can be modified to run HP. This is an interesting read on dyno testing one.
    www.motortrend.com/how-to/holley-390-carburetor-tech-tuning/amp/

    You don't say how you're building the 265? Is this a fairly stock engine or are you planning 7K RPM and a lumpy cam.
    If it's more of a driver, the AFB recommendation or an edelbrock carb drive very well, crisp low speed throttle response and plenty of secondary capacity. Vacuum secondary holley would do the same.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  6. Jmountainjr
    Joined: Dec 29, 2006
    Posts: 1,867

    Jmountainjr
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    As mentioned, you didn't say how mild or wild the 265 is built. Picking a carb on looks usually leads to some compromises in performance. Having a choke and vaccum secondaries is a pretty proven recipe for a mild 265. But it's your car, so do what makes you happy. Being a bit anal about such things myself, I understand about wanting a look.
     
    KKrod, 427 sleeper and Just Gary like this.
  7. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    The single pumper I looked up is dual feed. I couldn't get by on the street without a choke, especially with an automatic trans.

    p.JPG
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  8. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,275

    Fordors
    Member

    Forget this one unless you are a glutton for punishment, it’s a Chineseium knockoff.
     
  9. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,803

    oldiron 440
    Member

    Im not a fan of the Holley VS for a couple superficial reasons, it just doesn’t look as racy as the double pumper and if it’s working properly you can’t feel the secondaries opening. Having said that I have used a 600 Holley VS on my mild 289 with a c4 and it worked out very well. 289 with cam , intake, carb and headers stock converter and transmission ran 14.0s @ 98 mph in the quarter and get about 17 mpg on the highway.
    I think you would be happy with either carb I’d be tempted to try the DP just because.
    Good luck
     
  10. Rand Man
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 5,276

    Rand Man
    Member

    Why the 390 cfm? I’ve used the 390 on a 239 Flathead. I think 265 could handle a bigger carb.
     
  11. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,393

    indyjps
    Member

    Ultimately it comes down to your willingness or ability to dial it in. No disrespect intended here. If youre looking for out of the box drop on carb the 390 DP is not it. If you're willing to potentially change power valves, pump nozzles, rejet you're good to go.

    Depends on model of 390, I haven't looked them up in some time. It's really meant for wide open throttle class racing with carb as the restrictor, and gets shipped that way. To get off idle and midrange to work smoothly for a driver it needs dialed in.
     
    427 sleeper, 2OLD2FAST and Just Gary like this.
  12. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Wow, didn't know they were doing Holley carbs! Is nothing sacred?

    That said, I have bought a couple of Chinese carbs for other stuff, one for an ATV, another for a generator, and they are working great.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2022
    AccurateMike likes this.
  13. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    That explains the price. Last Holley I bought was in the $700 range....pre Covid.
    Since the OP already has the 390's I'd suggest the vacuum job for simplicity.
     
    Joe Travers and Just Gary like this.
  14. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,661

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    The vacuum secondary 390 will be more street friendly. But I think there are better choices for your 265 myself, and they're also easier on the wallet. The 390's are a bit more money than the typical 1850 vacuum secondary carbs, and I think even a mild built 265 can handle the 1850 600cfm with vacuum secondaries.
     
    73RR, warbird1, metlmunchr and 2 others like this.
  15. B.A.KING
    Joined: Apr 6, 2005
    Posts: 4,039

    B.A.KING
    Member

    I looked at this carb last night. Then i noticed it does not say HOLLEY anywhere on the ad.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  16. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Yet somehow they get it in there when you search. And first up!

    sfddsf.JPG
     
  17. TA DAD
    Joined: Mar 2, 2014
    Posts: 1,559

    TA DAD
    Member
    from NC

    2OLD2FAST likes this.
  18. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,393

    indyjps
    Member

  19. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,857

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    I've never found a Holley that needed a choke.:)
     
  20. iagsxr
    Joined: Aug 26, 2008
    Posts: 295

    iagsxr
    Member

    I was going to say that until the OP comes back with more information this is pointless.

    Then it dawned on me, there is nothing Hot Rod about a single inlet, vac secondary Holley. That's a truck carb.

    Make the double pumper work.
     
  21. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    Forget the race carb. Get a carb/w vacuum secondaries and cfm rating of 500 or less. Take a look at Summit's 500 cfm carb (made by Holley).
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  22. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,877

    6sally6
    Member

    It's a Shivel-lay!........Stick an Edelbroke on it and drive it!!!
    No Kidd 'in a 500 cfm Eddy carb would 'look right' and run wayyyy better than a DP racing carb from Chineee.
    As far as "feelin-it" when the secondaries pop in......the air dam on the Eddy had a counterweight on it that allows the secondaries to 'gently' come in as the vacuum increases.
    The trick!......drill a hole in the weight to reduces the weight of the counter-weight!
    Kind uva trial & error thing. Too light and it will bog when it comes in.
    I recommend you sneak up on it.
    Trying to drive a double pumper on the street would be a real challenge if you axe me. Too much foot and it bogs pump it on & off and you're dumping raw fuel where it don't need to be.
    DP & a stick car on the street............maybe. NOT on an A/T car.
    My oppinion
    6sally6
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,388

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    But it says it is "NEW" and "GOOD"!
     
    SS327 and '34 Ratrod like this.
  24. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,388

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have never been a fan of mechanical secondaries on the street.

    That said, where I have seen them work best is where the overall CFM of the whole carburetor is right at the appropriate size for the engine, and so long as the transition into the secondary opening is tuned properly.

    If one compares the CFM requirements of the typical hot rod engine, versus what is on top for a carburetor, you will likely note that the builder overshot the requirements. In the case of a vacuum secondary carburetor, that's fine, as the secondaries are on-demand. They may rarely, if ever, be opening during normal operation.

    With a double-pumping mechanical secondary carburetor, you will have the secondaries open quite a bit.

    If you look at a smaller Edelbrock, you will even see that the primaries are quite a bit smaller than the secondaries. They are a minor fraction of the total CFM of the carburetor.

    This allows higher venturi velocity, for better, more efficient fuel metering at lower engine speeds (like you have with street driving).

    Either way, a 265 (at an optimistic 85% efficiency) at a dangerous 6,000rpm needs only 391.06cfm.
     
    kevinrevin likes this.
  25. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    I suggest you look up that carb from "Chineee." I hope you like crow. By the way, The Holley 0-80507-1 390 cfm "Nascar" carburetor retails for $825. Still think it's made in "Chinee?"
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2022
  26. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

     
  27. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    I'm not partial to any particular brand. My wife's cousin's husband has been running a 600 cfm carburetor on his 65 Mustang/w 302 for years without issues.

    As Gimpy said, the smaller primaries will be more responsive at lower rpm and return better mpg. If you compared a 2-bbl. carb with a 4-bbl. carb of the same cfm, the 4-bbl. would be more efficient at lower rpm for that reason.
     
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,388

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It is worth pointing out that a 500cfm 2-barrel and a 500cfm 4-barrel don't flow the same.

    They are, for reasons nobody has yet to justify to me, measured with different criteria. Yes, a 4-barrel cannot always be rated using the 2-barrel scale, as it won't hold the vacuum, but you can rate a 2-barrel on the 4-barrel scale. My thinking is that this should just be standardized to avoid confusion.

    If I recall correctly, a 2-barrel is rated at 3-inches of Mercury vacuum, and a 4-barrel is at 1-1/2-inches, each wide-open.

    That would put a 500cfm 2-barrel at about 355cfm on the 4-barrel scale, give-or-take my brain-math.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2022
  29. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Two search words I'm unfamiliar with :)
     
  30. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,022

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    One too many 7-Eleven sandwich's I take it?
     
    blowby likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.