Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects '50 Chevy Fleetline Driveline

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Anthony Avila, Feb 9, 2016.

  1. Anthony Avila
    Joined: Feb 9, 2016
    Posts: 10

    Anthony Avila

    Hey everyone, I'm Anthony and this is my first post. My question is simple and yet somewhat challenging because of the options.

    1950 Chevy Fleetline Deluxe w/235 straight 6

    What "modern" driveline setup is the easiest to acquire, budget friendly and offers a fairly simple installation; wait for it.....while still maintaining the 3 speed column shift?

    I've seen so many opinions and setups, I can't keep track of all the components. So please do your best to give me a A, B, C, breakdown of components.

    I'm currently curious about this set up since highway driveability is lacking in a 3 speed.
    1969 Saginaw Full Synco 3-speed
    Borg Warner R10 Overdrive
    Some type of adapter plate
    1967 Nova Differential w/ 308s
     
  2. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    261 is just a bigger 235. Physically probably the easiest, but not much increase n horsepower. But it isn't "modern", which is not a problem for the HAMB. If by "modern", you mean an LS swap or something comparable, you are on wrong board. A 230 or 250 straight 6 is a better engine than a 235/261, would require a minimum of fabrication to install, and will easily make small V8 horsepower. Plus with duals, you get the cool exhaust sound. Avoid the integral head 250. 292 is a bigger 6, but is longer. Might create radiator and fan issues. Also fairly thirsty, but good power. At the end the rainbow, a small block Chevy, 283 - 350 is going to be the cheapest and easiest to do. If the Nova rear fits, it is a good choice. I used a 57 chevy rear end in my 48. With a smaller engine or an overdrive, you might want to think about more gear than a 3.08. 55 -57 Chevys with overdrive used 4.11s and 3.73s. I can't speak to the transmission choice.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2016
  3. Anthony Avila
    Joined: Feb 9, 2016
    Posts: 10

    Anthony Avila

    Let me clarify some. I want to keep the 235. I was referring to the ****** and rear end.

    I said "modern" because I'm sure that I'll have to go to an open drive shaft.
     
  4. jcmarz
    Joined: Jan 10, 2010
    Posts: 4,631

    jcmarz
    Member
    from Chino, Ca

    Modern and 3 on the tree is like oil and water. You can easily change the gear ratio without having to change the entire rear end and still be able to keep that 3 on the tree.
     
  5. Anthony Avila
    Joined: Feb 9, 2016
    Posts: 10

    Anthony Avila

    I've only seen the Patrick's 3.55.1:1 gear replacement kit for the factory driveline and was told by a shop that it would be pointless. I'm not too savvy on gear ratios but I know higher ratios (lower numbers) are better for highway drivability. I've read that the factory ratio is in the 4s, and so 3.55s don't sound like a bad option but what do I know.
     
  6. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,475

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Not necessarily ... all '54 Powerglide running gear (brakes, steering, rear axle) with a '53 - '54 3 speed would make a whole different car out of it.
    Better show us the engine - pics ???
     
  7. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    Same "year" or so truck bellhousing so the pattern for the Saginaw OD will bolt to it, or a Tri-Five 6 cylinder bellhousing. You want to try and keep the bellhousing support mounts. Finding the Saginaw 3 speed with OB will be the difficult part, they are rare; you could use a Tri-Five Muncie 3-speed with OD. For a six, I think the 3.08 is TOO steep a gear; you want 3.70-4.11. Tri-Five rear end is the easiest; starting to see a pattern there? Any rear you use though will most likely have Bendix style brakes, while the 50 has Huck brakes; to replace them means swapping everything from the backing plates out, or going to disc brakes. I would go with a later style 250 six, keep your current 3-speed, swap to a 3.55 gear in the rear that comes in the Powerglide equipped 49-54 cars, 51-54 will get you Bendix brakes.
    I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
  8. RainierHooker
    Joined: Dec 20, 2011
    Posts: 2,031

    RainierHooker
    Member
    from Tacoma, WA

    Retaining the same engine, any three-speed transmission swap, with the exception of an overdrive, will net net you exactly the same results that you have. A 1:1 high gear ratio is a 1:1 high gear ratio. All the transmissions you have listed have the same third gear ratio. The Saginaw 3-speed gives you a synchro on 1st and a little friendlier low gear curve, but thats about it. The R10, which is just a different tail shaft on your otherwise stock transmission, will lower the drive ratio to the rear by about 15% (most are a 0.85:1 ratio).

    Your best bet if you want increased speed is a final gear ratio swap (rear end), and tuning the engine to run in the sweet-spot that that rear end nets. The stock ****** is fine, thats why they used them for another decade plus...
     
  9. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,071

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    might as well do some external upgrades to motor to make it perform & look better
     
  10. Anthony Avila
    Joined: Feb 9, 2016
    Posts: 10

    Anthony Avila

    I'm definitely going to go through the entire car. It was my Grandfather's and now it's mine. I had planned on moving it to my house to work on it, but the rear brakes were seized and so I had to beat the **** out of the drum to get them free. I also heard a pop when I depressed the clutch, so I think something either freed itself up or broke. The car is not safe at the moment.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.