Register now to get rid of these ads!

1952-59 Ford 53 Brake upgrade

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by Deviot, Oct 4, 2020.

  1. Deviot
    Joined: Nov 2, 2006
    Posts: 12

    Deviot
    Member
    from Australia

    Hi all,
    I'm looking at some brake work during the restoration.
    I will keep the drums for now at least and am wanting to replace the booster and master cylinder.
    In the future I may swap out the front to disc, but not at this stage.

    I'm thinking a 7" or 8" single or dual diaphram booster and Disc/drum master cylinder.
    Would this be suitable for what I'm trying to do?
    Also with the vacuum of the original 239 be ok to run this?

    thanks

    Dave
     
  2. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Over the years guys here have not liked the single 7" boosters the duals are better. This brand has worked well for members in the past https://www.ebay.com/itm/1954-1956-...e:Ford&hash=item4d6bb7ee88:g:~1MAAOSwHwJaWpbk Notice the bracket where it mounts to the firewall ? You need that if you are staying with the Y-block to clear the exhaust,if the engine is in good tune the vacuum should be OK have you taken a reading on it yet ?
     
  3. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,570

    evintho
    Member

    Kustomline54 likes this.
  4. Paul2748
    Joined: Jan 8, 2003
    Posts: 2,442

    Paul2748
    Member

    Don't use a disc/drum master if you have all drum brakes
     
    53vicky likes this.
  5. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

  6. nascardave
    Joined: Jan 31, 2010
    Posts: 190

    nascardave
    Member

    Just so everyone knows. In the last 15-20 years. The manufacturer of Master Cylinders does not install residual check value any longer in drum brake dual master or disc brake drum brake masters. There theory is, brake fluid does not run up hill. If master is mounted on fire wall check valve is not needed. here is a print out from ECI Engineering, as to when check valves are needed.
     

    Attached Files:

    JeffB2 and Texas57 like this.
  7. 53vicky
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 994

    53vicky
    Member

    I went the pricey route and put Wilwood Dynalite up front, with a Wilwood master, no booster, and an in line pressure residual valve for the rear drums. Stops like an absolute dream. Pricey, but everything lined up absolutely perfectly. No jerry rigging anything. I highly recommend it.
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  8. shortshift
    Joined: Nov 7, 2013
    Posts: 350

    shortshift
    Member

    53vicky, are u running drums or disc's up front. I havent seen shoes on the wilwood website (maybe i missed em). I am thinking i need better stopping on the 54. New shoes and turned drums are ok but i wished the stopping was easier on the right foot. Or maybe i just need to swtch from drum to disc.
     
    53vicky likes this.
  9. Texas57
    Joined: Oct 21, 2012
    Posts: 3,741

    Texas57
    Member

    Simply put, there's a reason the whole world has changed to disc brakes.
     
    53vicky likes this.
  10. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    What master cylinder do you have now ? Also in the "Sticky FAQ" there is a link for Kevlar Ceramic brake shoes for 1952-54 Fords also did you do the self adjuster upgrade ?
     
  11. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,056

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I did the same in my 56. Wilwood 4 piston calipers, their master and no booster and I’m very happy. Plus I don’t need to look at that “can” every time I open the hood. The M/C only has 2 studs so I made a fake plate and painted it black to finish the appearance. FE9A2C1C-9115-4BE9-9360-538D9E6A74CD.jpeg
     
  12. shortshift
    Joined: Nov 7, 2013
    Posts: 350

    shortshift
    Member

    I have 66? mustang master, 1" bore. I think the pedal pressure is ok, its been 40 years since i had manual brakes so i may be expecting to much. I just got the car on the road after a 3 yr rebuild, new or turned drums and new brake shoes. and only 250 miles so far. If i consider it a death machine, i will bite the bullet and do the disc's. Jeff, i think you are right about the ceramics. Not sure if spending the $ on new shoes would make it that much better. Whats the consensus on the ceramics...worth it or not. Thanks Guys for any input. Just glad to be driving this think FINALLY P1160149.JPG
     
    the-stig likes this.
  13. larryb
    Joined: Dec 25, 2006
    Posts: 128

    larryb
    Member

    I'm old and not prone to change. Disk brakes are great if making high speed stops repe***ively or drive in mountains I have some hot rods with 4 wheel disk and some with 4 wheel drums. I can hard stop and lock up the tires on either one. No matter what kind of brakes you have if the tires stop rolling that's as fast as your going to stop. With that being said in normal everyday driving I feel perfectly safe in a drum drum car.
     
    54vicky and JeffB2 like this.
  14. 54HotRod
    Joined: May 31, 2010
    Posts: 509

    54HotRod
    Member

    I bought the Wilwood disc conversion kit through Jamco last summer with the M/C. Since I am still doing the frame off and learning as I go, I don't have any idea how well they will work. Hopefully I install everything correctly and don't smash things instead of stop in the future.
     
    cascadian likes this.
  15. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,736

    bobss396
    Member

    I run manual front discs, no booster and it stops nicely. Anyone who drives the car mentions how well it stops. Master is from Speedway with a 1" bore. I felt it would be easier to sort out leaving it manual, I could always add a booster later.
     
    Texas57 likes this.
  16. 53vicky
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 994

    53vicky
    Member

    I have the Wilwood Dynalite discs up front and drums in the rear. I highly highly recommend it. I live in rural Nor Cal, constantly going up and down steep hills, and have to deal with *****ic California drivers when cruising into Sac, so I wanted something that I knew would stop well.
     
  17. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,736

    bobss396
    Member

    The Wilwood disc kits are very nice. I helped someone with one on a Mopar, great quality and the price wasn't that bad over some I have seen that were not as nice.
     
  18. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,056

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm courious about the responses using a 1" M/C and no power. When I researched everything a 1" were for power ***ist front, 1-1/8" for 4 wheel discs, and 7/8" and smaller are for non-power ***ist. 7/8" were recommended by Wilwood and others and a 5 to 1 pedal ratio.
     
    53vicky likes this.
  19. Zax
    Joined: May 21, 2017
    Posts: 901

    Zax
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    When I did the front disc swap in my '40 Ford I used a Maverick disc/drum manual master that had a 7/8 bore. Works pretty well.
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  20. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,945

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    I have a 7/8 bore MC on my 53 F100, Volare front disc, Tbird IRS with drums, stops great. Now my wife would not be pleased with it, nor anyone who has grown up with power brakes, but it stops extremely well with some effort. But I have no problem going from the F100 to my 40 with great power brakes. In other words the effort is not that much greater.
     
    Dos Cincos likes this.
  21. 53vicky
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 994

    53vicky
    Member

    I have a 1" and no booster. I went with 1" simply because I found it on sale.. but I have no problems with it being too tough at all.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.