Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 6" rod SBC cam & intake theory

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by treb11, Feb 22, 2021.

  1. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 4,104

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    So I'm toying with the idea of building a 350 with 6" rods. Its pretty well known that the longer dwell time of the piston gives various benefits. The crank assembly kits from Speedway are affordable as are individual parts.

    So, the question is: what camshaft profile makes best use of the longer rod motor?

    Same question for the induction. It seems a natural for a TPI setup, but that's OT. Let's stick to normally aspirated. What manifold, carb CFM. Etc.

    It would seem that keeping charge velocity up would be a challenge.

    The old Hot Rod article with a 400 block, 300 Ford 6 rods and 327 crank didn't really go into cam theory.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Deuces likes this.
  2. You are on the right track for top end performance only......if that's what your goal is. For lower RPM ranges (where most street rods operate), the shorter rod shows better performance on a dyno.
     
  3. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Budget36
    Member

    @hotrodart I recall the article the OP is referring to, as I recall the engine made a lot of torque early and didn’t fall off much. I think the article was along the lines of “the 350 Chevy should have made”? Or similar. It also was done on regular gas as well.
     
  4. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,675

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    We did one with 6-1/8” rods and 400 piston specs for the pin height as I remember. All parts off the shelf. HP or not I use the longest rod I can. I still have a set of Elgin 6-1/8” rods for a street engine not strong enough for the racing we do now.
     
  5. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,764

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I would like to know too, planning a poor mans sbc 302 build, using 6" rods and machining .030 off the tops of flat top 350 pistons. :rolleyes:
     
  6. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 962

    42merc
    Member

    Check out recent "Engine Masters" on Motor Trend TV.
    David Frieburger & Co. did dyno tests using a BBC with Long & short rod combos.
    Their tests showed that long rods made more power at the low end, short rods more power on top. Although, the differences were minimal, just a few HP different.
    Street motor, not enough to bother with, all out race motor, yes.
     
  7. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,857

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    I always thought the long rods caused less side loading on the cyl walls and piston skirts. JMO Lippy
     
    Deuces, jimmy six, Roothawg and 2 others like this.
  8. Side loading was mentioned on the Engine masters episode. As 42merc said, the gains were very minimal, the engine really did not care that there was a longer rod as far as HP and torque.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  9. TA DAD
    Joined: Mar 2, 2014
    Posts: 1,563

    TA DAD
    Member
    from NC

    I am building a 350 Chevy, with 40 over flat top Carrillo pistons. Not sure of the rod brand but they are 6 in. I have a set of World products cast iron heads with 1.94 - 1.50 valves. I have a Performer intake ( dual plane ) and The cam I have is a solid flat tappet and I do not know the manufacturer or the specs. This stuff came out of a round track car and ran off a 7200 chip. I hope to have in together this spring. I will post how it does , but I look for it to run good.
     
  10. Jmountainjr
    Joined: Dec 29, 2006
    Posts: 1,868

    Jmountainjr
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    As 42merc said, the typical performance difference is not that great. But if you are in a situation where winning and losing is differentiated in small numbers it's worth it. But as I said before I take calculated risks in race engines that get routine maintenance, not so on street engines. My favorite street rod engine is a 5.7" rod 406. The 5.7" rod keeps the wrist pin out of the oil ring. On a 6" rod you need to run a ring bridge.
     
    Deuces and jaw22w like this.
  11. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Budget36
    Member

    Unknown and mis-matched parts (I e circle track and dual plane intake). Seems like a poor choice from the back of my phone.
    Best of luck.
     
  12. TA DAD
    Joined: Mar 2, 2014
    Posts: 1,563

    TA DAD
    Member
    from NC

    Time will tell.
     
  13. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,675

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    TADad...Your typical all iron flat tappet dirt track engine makes its power at 6200 but will turn over over 7000 and hit the mandatory 7200 chip. A dual plane manifold will bring the torque down and tend to limit the rpm depending on your rear gear. Unless it came off a 1/2 mile it probably ran 6.20" to 6.50's in the rear which is why it could see the 7200. The cam may be a little much depending on the rockers but most tracks have a .600" max lift and 1.5 rocker normally don't make that. You can only do so much with a iron cam. It would be nice to see what the valve spring pressure is... I'm guessing 120 to 130. I'd run Hot Rod oil with zinc.
    It's obvious not a IMCA modified which runs alcohol and high compression even as a claimer so I would guess a super or pro stock as usually street stocks cannot have aftermarket heads. My guess is you will enjoy it.
     
    TA DAD likes this.
  14. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,857

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    I keep forgetting this is a gasoline deal. With the correct camshaft on nitro piston dwell can be your friend. Sorry. :D It will run good on gas either way. LOL
     
  15. TA DAD
    Joined: Mar 2, 2014
    Posts: 1,563

    TA DAD
    Member
    from NC

    I can't wait, I know it will be fun ! I am in the process of getting everything ready to go to the machine shop. The valve spring pressure is concerning because they are pretty big, this is going in front of a manual shift Turbo 400 with a brake along with a 4200 stall 10in. Turbo Action convertor ( yeah that's a ,little loose, but they will tighten it up for $150.00 )29in. tall tires, along with a Moser 60 on Super Stock springs with a 4:10 and a spool, you know this is gonna be enjoyable ! Everybody's definition of a Hot Rod is different !
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.