Register now to get rid of these ads!

62 Park Ave Caddy

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Johnny Gee, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Do any of you Caddy guys know why the body is 7" shorter? Was it a selling point of some sort? Other than the decklid being shorter is there anywhere else they made it shorter? Is the rear seating differant? ect ect. Any info would be helpfull.
     
  2. 40StudeDude
    Joined: Sep 19, 2002
    Posts: 9,562

    40StudeDude
    Member

    "Series 62" Cadillacs were the "cheaper"models...the 'named' models: Eldorado, Coupe DeVille, etc. were more expensive, more luxurious, therefore larger...at least, that's the way I got it figured...may be right, may not be...!!!

    R-
     
  3. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    There are other 62 series that are full length at 222" the Park was only 215"
     
  4. G V Gordon
    Joined: Oct 29, 2002
    Posts: 5,725

    G V Gordon
    Member
    from Enid OK

  5. mattrod68
    Joined: Jan 22, 2007
    Posts: 517

    mattrod68
    Member

    i think they were shorter to fit in the garages of the exploding suburban homes at the time.

    caddillac to fit in everyones garage not just the well off
     
  6. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    BTTT for the morning gang. Thanks for info so for. I have searched info thru search engines already. What I'm really after is some personal info that anyone may have since searches just give me what I already know.
     
  7. CADILLAC AL
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 298

    CADILLAC AL
    Member

    I have a friend with a 61 Town Sedan. The Life/Look mag ad said it was built with a slightly shorter deck to make it easier to manuver in big city traffic & to fit in short inner city garages.
    Al
     
  8. LSGUN
    Joined: May 26, 2007
    Posts: 1,389

    LSGUN
    Member
    from TX

    I didn't know they made shorter deck Cadillacs, did that start in '61?
     
  9. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Thanks Cadillac Al, thats something I have not come across yet.
     
  10. TexasDart
    Joined: Oct 11, 2007
    Posts: 853

    TexasDart
    Member

    I was told it is the 'sport' model. They didn't make very many. I only saw one recently.
     
  11. Jobe
    Joined: Oct 19, 2004
    Posts: 1,248

    Jobe
    Member
    from Austin, Tx

    The 'short deck' Park Avenue or Town Sedan is only shorter in the trunk area. The interior, seats, doors, etc. are all the same as the regular sedans.
     
  12. froghawk
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 857

    froghawk
    Member

    Years ago a friend loaned me his copy of the 1958 Cadillac "dealer book" as reference for a model project. The book showed all the colors, upholstery, features and benefits of the various models, including the short deck "Park Avenue" 4DHT and the Eldorado Brougham.

    According to Cadillac, the main benefit of the short deck sedan was (as "Cadillac Al" stated above) was better maneuverability in traffic in addition to better parkability on the street. But as I recall there wasn't necessarily a downgrade in the trim from the regular model, though I don't remember if it was equivalent to the "Deville" series or the standard "62" series.

    I'm pretty sure there were "short deck" cars in '57, and possibly earlier. Hope that helps.
     
  13. ryno
    Joined: Oct 6, 2005
    Posts: 3,469

    ryno
    Member

    i have seen some adds for them advertising them for easier maneuvering in the new york parking garages and fitting into spaces easier. for the elite business man!

    i have a 61 myself.
     
  14. bob-o
    Joined: Aug 12, 2007
    Posts: 334

    bob-o
    Member

    It's been mentioned a few times already, but all the reading I'd ever done had said that the Park Avenue was built to be easier to manuver and park in big city type settings. They didn't make many of them, I guess most people weren't interested in a Caddy that was easy to parallel park. They've got a real unique look. I know they have a shorter overall length.. And I'm pretty sure the wheelbase is shorter too.. Not sure on that though. I am sure though that the trim level was at least on par with the mid to top level caddy's of the day.
     
  15. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Keep it come'n, this is good. Thanks
     
  16. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,802

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    This is correct from their marketing view. In order to make it that much easier to get around somewhere like "Park Avenue". Style wise I think thy look really kool. The interiors were a bit more lush, options were plenty, basically meant to appeal to the crowd it was named after.
     
  17. Sweepspear
    Joined: May 17, 2010
    Posts: 292

    Sweepspear
    Member

    Interesting. Never heard of such a Cadillac.
     
  18. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Just don't tell your date it's 7" shorter :eek:
     
  19. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    Being employed at Saint Claire Motor Co. at the time, I can only attest to some conversation (backed up by New Car Brochure) between the Sales Manager and every year customer Henry Sutcliffe Coe. (Calif. State Park namesake!)
    Joe told Mr. Coe the main advantage of the Park Avenue was "the ease of parking, not to mention agility in traffic"...
    It was illustrated in the color brochure, "no 'wasted' trunk space, compact length, yet retains the premium Cadillac wheelbase."

    I had just bought a '61 Ford Starliner, otherwise it would have been a white Park Avenue.
    (yeah, I was gonna drop it. And lightly scallop it.)
     
  20. Zerk
    Joined: May 26, 2005
    Posts: 1,418

    Zerk
    Member

    It's hard to believe that a stock wheelbase Cadillac sedan with 7" cut out of the trunk would be so agile in traffic.

    Now, if you cut three feet out of the rear overhang it might start to look a little more like a quarterhorse than a clydesdale. I'd like to try that with a '63 or 64 that's already in bad shape.
     
  21. DetroitDetomaso
    Joined: Jun 22, 2010
    Posts: 139

    DetroitDetomaso
    Member
    from Las Vegas

    one just sold here in Vegas for around 1500.
     
  22. GaryB
    Joined: Dec 19, 2008
    Posts: 3,529

    GaryB
    Member
    from Reno,nv

    any pics of this caddy ?
     
  23. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Sorry no pics. This is a car that was brought to my attention thats for sale. And when I was told it was a Park Avenue I said Caddy does not make that. I was wrong and just got curius about the car.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2010
  24. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,802

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    The model carried into 63. Do a google image search for pics. Sometimes they also pop up on evilbay
     
  25. cruzingratiot
    Joined: Oct 2, 2008
    Posts: 345

    cruzingratiot
    Member
    from Detroit MI

    model number 62-63 d
    body style number 6389d
    body type seating park ave 6pas sedan
    fact price 5,631
    shipping weight 4,655
    production total 2,600
    info from standard catalog of cadillac 1903-1990
     
  26. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,453

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Well got to see the car next to it's big brother. Everything is or I should say they both could be had with all the bells and whistles. So the Park is not a cheapy model, just short. As stated before in the thread it deck led is shorter and the 1/4's. You really can't see the differance until you park them side to side.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.