Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 8.8 Rear End for a Hotrod Info

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by panhead_pete, Aug 21, 2020.

  1. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,718

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks GreaseMonkey just edited the post to reflect the tag info.
     
    greasemonkey54 likes this.
  2. If I get a Ford in the shop tomorrow I'll photograph the tag for a visual explanation
     
    panhead_pete likes this.
  3. LWEL9226
    Joined: Jul 7, 2012
    Posts: 362

    LWEL9226
    Member
    from So. Oregon

    We put one in a '56 Parklane wagon....
    Shortened the long side 2 7/8 to short side dim.... Fit very well... no tunnel issues at all...

    LynnW
     
  4. Rusty J
    Joined: Nov 25, 2019
    Posts: 155

    Rusty J
    Member

    I'm running an 8.8 under my 39 chevy sedan - the one in my picture, and mustang 2 front suspension - yes I know it's forbidden, but that's what it is. Glad to see some good info here. I'm in the process of modifying the wheel wells to fit the wide tires - this is fun. Oh, and a Chevy running on Ford suspension - what alternate universe is this?? :)
     
    coast40 and Okie Pete like this.
  5. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,620

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Put a non Hemi in it and really see the vortex shift.:cool:
     
    coast40 and Okie Pete like this.
  6. typo41
    Joined: Jul 8, 2011
    Posts: 2,571

    typo41
    Member Emeritus

    Put a non Hemi in it and really see the vortex shift.:cool:

    That will cause a rip in the Space Time Continuum
     
    coast40 and Okie Pete like this.
  7. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,718

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Have updated the original thread, as I find new relevant info will continue to do that so its all in one place. Thanks to all that are contributing. Got to love the HAMB.
     
  8. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,718

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  9. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,816

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

  10. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,056

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    As for being traditional. The “look” of an 8.8 is nearly the same are early T-Birds, Ford wagons and pickups.. good enough for me.
     
  11. coast40
    Joined: Mar 22, 2008
    Posts: 118

    coast40
    Member


    I have an Exploder rear on hand to replace the DANA 53 in my 40, if necessary.
     
  12. blue 49
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,126

    blue 49
    Member
    from Iowa

    Dif Cover.png Dif Cover 2.JPG
    If using junkyard parts make something more traditional, a rear cover from an Explorer with IRS can be made to look pretty good. Just trim the ch***is mounts off.

    Gary
     
    winduptoy, brEad, Uncle Ronn and 5 others like this.
  13. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,353

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    Are those "fill" and "drain" plugs functional ? You did a nice job modifying it.
     
  14. blue 49
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,126

    blue 49
    Member
    from Iowa

    Both plugs are real. The big drain may be for ring gear inspection, too. I don't know why else it would be that size. Also, it doesn't leak like the chinese chrome one I had on before.

    Gary
     
  15. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,718

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks Gary. What are those `straps` you used to hold the brake lines down?
     
  16. blue 49
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,126

    blue 49
    Member
    from Iowa

    Just worm gear hose clamps. I opened my vise to about 1/4" and pounded a radius into them to fit the brake lines.

    Gary
     
  17. Do all 8.8 Ford axles have the pinion offset? I was considering a Ranger 8.8 for my 1950 Chevy 3100, but I haven’t started on it yet and I’m unsure if the offset will be a problem.
     
  18. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,718

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks Gary
     
  19. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,920

    6sally6
    Member

    I would love to see pictures of your Foul-**** !!
    Since my early years with a 64 Sprint..........I have kept a soft spot for them....
    thanx
    6sally6
     
  20. blue 49
    Joined: Dec 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,126

    blue 49
    Member
    from Iowa

    Mine, in my Henry J, is from an '03 Ranger with the offset. It's not a problem if it clears the driveshaft tunnel. Shouldn't be a problem in a truck.

    Gary
     
  21. brEad
    Joined: Dec 23, 2016
    Posts: 2,039

    brEad
    Member

  22. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,674

    tjm73
    Member

    This is an old post but I wanted to correct this info for future searchers. 1996 was the last year for the 5x5.5 bolt pattern "boxy" body style. All were drum brake. 11" x 2.5" if I recall correctly. In 1997 the F150 went much more aero. It also changed to 5x135mm (5x5.315") bolt pattern and with it came disc brakes that require 16" or larger wheels.

    Edit: extra info....the 97+ 5 lug trucks still had drum brakes in lower trim levels with the smaller engines.

    Edit 2: In researching the disc brakes question more I've come to believe that the 8.8 used in 97-up trucks never got disc brakes. I believe, until I know differently, that if the 97-up truck has disc brakes it has a 9.75 Sterling axle. I don't believe that any 97-up 8.8 ever left Ford with disc brakes and the truck 5x135 bolt pattern.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.