Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 8BA Flatheads 101 Loadomatic..... Why is this ignored?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by F-ONE, Aug 6, 2024.

  1. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,619

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    I see a great number of multiple carb set ups on 8BAs either in person or online.
    Most will still have the stock distributor.

    Now it is possible to run 94s with work done like splitting vacuum and fooling with the springs in the distributor.
    Most folks don’t that because they don’t understand the system and frankly don’t want to know the system.

    You try to explain it and you get this ....that’s how daddy/grandpa did it or seems to work OK for me....
    It’s like you kicked a favorite puppy for simply stating fact.

    Ignorance is bliss I guess.

    Sure it revs but there’s still no functioning advance.
     
  2. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,990

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    I don't know. A guy I used to work with had a '52 Ford that was stock except for dual exhausts. One day, he came to work complaining about it having no acceleration and getting horrible mileage. I told him to check out the vacuum advance pod and, sure enough, it was ruptured. He replaced it and couldn't believe how much better it was. The situation you're describing has got to be the same.
     
    F-ONE likes this.
  3. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 2,936

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well if you advance the initial timing enough it will rev well and make good power. They just ignore the fact that it spark knocks under initial acceleration, it sometimes diesels when you turn it off hot, and it has a very slow crank on a hot engine start. Other than that, it runs fine.
     
  4. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,673

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There are no springs in a Load a Matic distributor. Vacuum advance only.

    Dave
     
  5. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,955

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I believe there are springs to help control the vacuum. There is no mechanical advance; perhaps this is what you mean by "no springs".
     
    warbird1 likes this.
  6. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,113

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Certainly is springs. As a note the Vacuum "can" was used alot on various Fomoco products , at least my '65 Comet 200 6L used the same one.
     
  7. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,619

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    There certainly are springs. They are not centrifugal springs but small coils. It’s these small coil springs in conjunction with the linkage from the vacuum canister that advances and retards the timing.

    In the 1957 book Fix Your Ford, the Loadomatic system talked about briefly.

    There used to be different color coil springs to adjust how the distributor responded to the vacuum signal.
     
  8. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,521

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Also commonly seen on yblocks. Loadomatic’s just aren’t understood well. And some people don’t want to understand. I think later ford 6’s used them too.
     
  9. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,545

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    20 yrs now running dual 94’s with a loadamatic. 8ba runs perfectly.
    Split the vacuum, ran identical carbs and eliminated one of the springs.
    It can be done. I even tried one of Bubbas gm adaptations and the loadamatic provided better power and mileage than the gm conversion.
    Averaging 15-17 mpg highway in my 37 coupe.
    And it’ll kick the ass of my hot 59L flathead in the lightweight 34 pickup
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2024
    winduptoy and F-ONE like this.
  10. 1952henry
    Joined: Jan 8, 2006
    Posts: 1,550

    1952henry
    Member

    If anyone remembers 286 Merc, he claimed it was possible to split vacuum and use the stock distributor. He seemed to know a thing a two about flatheads.
     
    F-ONE and Petejoe like this.
  11. deucemac
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 1,637

    deucemac
    Member

    Back in the dark ages, we tossed the loadamatic and went Mallory. Nowadays we toss the loadamatic and do a slight modification on Chevy point type distributors.
     
    warbird1 and F-ONE like this.
  12. Flathead Dave
    Joined: Mar 21, 2014
    Posts: 4,029

    Flathead Dave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from So. Cal.

    Who cares what someone runs. We don't need a lecture. It's none of our business what someone uses if it's not going to hurt them..
     
    RMR&C likes this.
  13. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,955

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I thought we were all here to help each other; I have gotten a lot of good ideas an assistance from this forum.

    I think this thread falls under that dictum. Your attitude surprises me.
     
  14. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,600

    clem
    Member

    here’s the link to the article you posted some years back, if anyone is interested, - see post 5.
    I kept it for my future reference.
    Just looked - posted almost 20 years ago !

    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/dual-94-carbs-on-a-flatty-setup-questions.36751/
    .
     
    F-ONE, Automotive Stud and Petejoe like this.
  15. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,545

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    He is exactly why I tried it. I miss that old curmudgeon.
     
    F-ONE likes this.
  16. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,545

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    Dave, gummies help. We all love you!
     
    leon bee, winduptoy and F-ONE like this.
  17. Automotive Stud
    Joined: Sep 26, 2004
    Posts: 4,387

    Automotive Stud
    Member

    Ha! I've got 97's on that car now, and that's a 59a not an 8ba, but still good info in there. FWIW the car runs better with the Strombergs now than no matter how I set up the dual 94's.
     
    winduptoy and F-ONE like this.
  18. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,619

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    Sometimes a lecture is good to hear if it educates. This is not how to polish rust or what color your wheels are.
    This is basic mechanics. We are talking about timing advance.
    Let’s go back to a Model T with the manual spark and throttle on the steering column.
    If the spark is wrong, the car is difficult to crank. It could even kick back and break bones.
    If the spark was wrong while driving, say like pulling hill, it’s very common to break a crankshaft.

    I know the late flathead is much different than the T Banger but still, no working spark advance can’t be good for it.

    Many assume that since the 8BA has a modern looking distributor that any carburetor combo is good to go. That’s not the case. If you change carburation on an 8BA you have to do something to the advance mechanism.

    Two 94s, you can split the vacuum and play with the springs.
    3 94s?.....Fix Your Ford 1957 says this just about impossible to run LOM with triples.
    (Personally it may be possible to run a primary 94 with secondaries and progressive linkage) that would take a lot of trail and error.
    As said 2x2 is about the limit with Loadomatic.
    Another option is an early tea pot or Carter Loadomatic 4bbl.

    Strombergs on an 8BA?
    The distributor needs to be changed to one with mechanical advance.

    Someone mentioned above that you can set the timing for the best overall and run it with no advance. That may work OK I guess, but I think it’s like a broken clock.
    It will be correct twice a day.

    With no advance the engine can....
    Run Hot
    Run Rich
    Have low power....

    What are flatheads known for?
    Running hot
    Running rich
    Low power

    It does have to be this way.

    Maybe this lecture will save people money. Especially when they see a that stock engine runs much better overall than one with 2k worth of carbs and linkage and 1k with of heads.
    Why?
    They did not address the advance issue.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2024
    HEATHEN and Petejoe like this.
  19. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,619

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    I hoping you would chime in Pete.
    You get it.
    You mentioned 286 Merc.
    He was really before my time.
    Another good one is Bruce Lancaster.

    Petejoe, 286 Merc, Bruce Lancaster and Tubman are all worth a search if you fooling with a flathead.
    I’m sure there are many more but these guys are solid.
     
    Petejoe and winduptoy like this.
  20. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,673

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    OOPS! Yes, of course you are right, and the others as well. I was indeed thinking of mechanical advance springs not being there. Thanks.

    Dave
     
  21. Flathead Dave
    Joined: Mar 21, 2014
    Posts: 4,029

    Flathead Dave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from So. Cal.

    HAHAHAHAHA
     
    Petejoe and F-ONE like this.
  22. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,442

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Can one of you explain what "split vacuum" is, or is it just connecting the vacuum advance port from both carbs through a "T" fitting, and then to the LOM distributor?
     
  23. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,545

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    Yes Connecting both of the carburetors Venturi ports with a T fitting and the other line to the distributor advance.
    One point that hasn’t been brought up is the importance of having a good working vacuum advance. Over the years many develope leaks and don’t respond properly.
     
    F-ONE likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.